Skip to main content

Hybrid MPC: An Application to Semiactive Control of Structures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 4

Abstract

In clipped LQR, a common strategy for semiactive structural control, a primary feedback controller is designed using LQR and a secondary controller clips forces that the semiactive control device cannot realize. However, when the primary controller commands highly non-dissipative forces, the frequent clipping may render a controller far from being optimal. A hybrid system model is better suited for semiactive control as it accurately models the passivity constraints by introducing auxiliary variables into the system model. In this paper, a hybrid model predictive control (MPC) scheme, which uses a system model with both continuous and discrete variables, is used for semiactive control of structures. Optimizing this control results in a mixed integer quadratic programming problem, which can be solved numerically to find the optimal control input. It is shown that hybrid MPC produces nonlinear state feedback control laws that achieve significantly better performance for some control objectives (e.g., the reduction of absolute acceleration). Responses of a typical structure to historical earthquakes, and response statistics from a Monte Carlo simulation with stochastic excitation, are computed. Compared to clipped LQR, hybrid MPC is found to be more consistent in the reduction of the objective functions, although it is more computationally expensive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Spencer BF Jr, Nagarajaiah S (2003) State of the art of structural control. J Struct Eng 129(7):845–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Spencer BF Jr, Sain MK (1997) Controlling buildings: a new frontier in feedback. Contr. Syst. IEEE 17(6):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Soong TT, Dargush GF (1997) Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  4. Housner GW, Bergman LA, Caughey TK, Chassiakos AG, Claus RO, Masri SF, Skelton RE, Soong TT, Spencer BF Jr, Yao JTP (1997) Structural control: past, present, and future. J Eng Mech 123(9):897–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Symans MD, Constantinou MC (1999) Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review. Eng Struct 21(6):469–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Soong TT, Spencer BF Jr (2002) Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Eng Struct 24(3):243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dyke SJ, Spencer BF, Sain MK, Carlson JD (1996) Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction. Smart Mater Struct 5(5):565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jansen LM, Dyke SJ (2000) Semiactive control strategies for MR dampers: comparative study. J Eng Mech 126(8):795–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun L, Goto Y (1994) Application of fuzzy theory to variable dampers for bridge vibration control. In: Proceedings of the 1st world conference on structural control, pp WP1:31–40, Los Angeles, CA, August 1994

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gavin H (2001) Control of seismically excited vibration using electrorheological materials and Lyapunov methods. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Tech 9(1):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang X, Gordaninejad F (2002) Lyapunov-based control of a bridge using magneto-rheological fluid dampers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 13(7–8):415–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iemura H, Pradono MH (2009) Advances in the development of pseudo-negative-stiffness dampers for seismic response control. Struct Contr Health Monit 16(7–8):784–799

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scruggs JT, Taflanidis AA, Iwan WD (2007) Non-linear stochastic controllers for semiactive and regenerative systems with guaranteed quadratic performance bounds Part 1: state feedback control. Struct Contr Health Monit 14(8):1101–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Scruggs JT, Taflanidis AA, Iwan WD (2007) Non-linear stochastic controllers for semiactive and regenerative systems with guaranteed quadratic performance bounds Part 2: output feedback control. Struct Contr Health Monit 14(8):1121–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson EA, Erkus B (2007) Dissipativity and performance analysis of smart dampers via LMI synthesis. Struct Contr Health Monit 14(3): 471–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson EA, Baker GA, Spencer BF Jr, Fujino Y (2007) Semiactive damping of stay cables. J Eng Mech 133(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramallo JC, Johnson EA, Spencer BF Jr (2002) “Smart” base isolation systems. J Eng Mech 128(10):1088–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qin SJ, Badgwell TA (2003) A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Contr Eng Pract 11(7):733–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mei G, Kareem A, Kantor JC (2001) Real-time model predictive control of structures under earthquakes. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 30(7):995–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mei G, Kareem A, Kantor JC (2002) Model predictive control of structures under earthquakes using acceleration feedback. J Eng Mech 128(5):574–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bemporad A, Morari M (1999) Control of systems integrating logic, dynamics, and constraints. Automatica 35(3):407–427

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Sontag E (1981) Nonlinear regulation: the piecewise linear approach. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 26(2):346–358

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Alur R, Courcoubetis C, Henzinger T, Ho P (1993) Hybrid automata: an algorithmic approach to the specification and verification of hybrid systems. In: Grossman R, Nerode A, Ravn A, Rischel H (eds) Hybrid systems. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 736. Springer, Berlin, pp 209–229

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bemporad A (2002) An efficient technique for translating mixed logical dynamical systems into piecewise affine systems. In: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE conference on decision and control, 2002, vol 2, pp 1970–1975, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heemels WPMH, De Schutter B, Bemporad A (2001) On the equivalence of classes of hybrid dynamical models. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE conference on decision and control, 2001, vol 1, pp 364–369, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van de Water H, Willems J (1981) The certainty equivalence property in stochastic control theory. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 26(5):1080–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chow GP (1976) Analysis and control of dynamic economic systems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hespanha JP (2009) Linear systems theory. Princeton Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Giorgetti N, Bemporad A, Tseng HE, Hrovat D (2005) Hybrid model predictive control application towards optimal semi-active suspension. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on industrial electronics, 2005. ISIE 2005, vol 1, pp 391–398, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  30. Löfberg J (2004) YALMIP: a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In: 2004 IEEE international symposium on computer aided control systems design, pp 284–289, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  31. IBM (2012) IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimizer. http://www.ibm.com/software/integration/optimization/cplex-optimizer/. Accessed 9 Sept 2012

  32. Gurobi (2012) Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual. http://www.gurobi.com. Accessed 9 Sept 2012

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the partial support of this work by the National Science Foundation, through awards CMMI 08-26634 and 11-00528, and by a USC Viterbi Doctoral Fellowship. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or of the University of Southern California.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wael M. Elhaddad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elhaddad, W.M., Johnson, E.A. (2013). Hybrid MPC: An Application to Semiactive Control of Structures. In: Catbas, F., Pakzad, S., Racic, V., Pavic, A., Reynolds, P. (eds) Topics in Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6555-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6555-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6554-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6555-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics