Abstract
Ambient and forced excitation test techniques are both widely used to dynamically identify civil engineering structures. Two floor levels of a newly constructed building, the Charles Institute at University College Dublin, were tested using both techniques. Both floor designs were identical although the layout of partitions above and below each were different. The objective of the tests was to determine the most appropriate test procedure and also to identify whether the layout of partitions contributes in a significant manner to dynamic response. It was found that at low levels of excitation, ambient test levels, the dynamic response of both floors was identical. In contrast, at higher vibration excitation levels, during forced vibration testing, the floor responses were substantially different. The differing modal parameters identified are attributed to an amplitude dependent response resulting from engagement, or not, of the partitions in the dynamic response of the system. The practical significance of this finding is that it is imperative to consider, and test at, the in-service vibration amplitude expected for a floor system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Zhang L, Brincker R, Andersen P (2005) An overview of operational modal analysis: major development and issues. In: SVIBS
Lamarche CP, Paultre P, Proulx J, Mousseau S (2008) Assessment of the frequency domain decomposition technique by forced-vibration tests of a full-scale structure. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 37(3):487–494
Beyen K, Kutanis M (2011) Comparison of the results inferred from OMA and IEMA. In: 4th international operational modal analysis conference, 9–11 May 2011, Istanbul
Ulusoy H, Feng M, Fanning PJ (2011) System identification of a building from multiple seismic records. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 40: 661–674
Reynolds P, Pavic A (2001) Comparison of forced and ambient vibration measurements on a bridge. In: IMAC-XIX, A Conference on Structural Dynamics 1:846–851
Schwarz B, Richardson M (2001) Post-processing ambient and forced response bridge data to obtain modal parameters. In: IMAC-XIX, Kissimmee, February 5–8, 2001
Peeters B, De Roeck G (December 2001) Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: a review. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 123:659–667
Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2001) Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition. Smart Mater Struct 10:441–445
Verboven P (2002) Frequency-domain system identification for modal analysis. PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
Vibrant Technology (2008) ME’scope VES 5.0—reference manual—Volume IIA—Basic Operations, pp 41–117
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their gratitude to (i) the Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering & Technology for their financial support, (ii) the Vibration Engineering Research Section of Sheffield University for use of their equipment, and (iii) UCD for access to the Charles Institute at UCD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Devin, A., Fanning, P.J., Middleton, C.J., Pavic, A. (2013). Structural Dynamic Parameter Identification and the Effect of Test Techniques. In: Catbas, F., Pakzad, S., Racic, V., Pavic, A., Reynolds, P. (eds) Topics in Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6555-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6555-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6554-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6555-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)