Advertisement

A Comparative Study of System Identification Techniques Under Ambient Vibration

  • Muhammad S. Rahman
  • David T. Lau
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

This paper presents the dynamic properties of the Confederation Bridge extracted by four output-only system identification algorithms applied to vibration monitoring data. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of different modal identification methods, particularly in the presence of high level of uncertainty and noise related to field measurement data. The modal estimates obtained using these alternative approaches are compared and verified against the modal properties from the finite element model.

Keywords

Ambient vibration Operational modal analysis Structural health monitoring System identification Continuous monitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support for this research provided by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council and the technical assistance provided by the maintenance and operation staff of the Strait Crossing Bridge Ltd are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Londoño NA, Lau DT, Rahman M (2011) Characteristics of dynamic monitoring data and observed behaviour of the Confederation Bridge due to operational load variations. Can J Civil Eng, doi: 10.1139/cjce-2011-0370Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brincker R, Zhang L, Anderson P (2000) Modal identification from ambient response using frequency domain decomposition. Proceedings of IMAC-XVIII, International modal analysis conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, pp 625–630Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Juang JN, Pappa RS (1985) An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. J Guid Contr 8(5):620–627zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Overschee P, De Moor B (1996) Subspace identification for linear systems: theory-implementation-applications. Kluwer-Academic, Dordrecht, The NetherlandszbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peeters B, Vecchio A, Van der Auweraer H (2004) PolyMAX modal parameter estimation form operational data. Proceedings of the 2004 international conference on noise and vibration engineering, 20–22 September, Leuven, Belgium, pp 1049–1063Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Desjardins SL, Londoño NA, Lau DT, Khoo H (2006) Real-time data processing, analysis and visualization for structural monitoring of the Confederation Bridge. J Adv Struct Eng 9(1):141–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lau DT, Londoño NA, Desjardins SL (2004) Challenges of using continuous monitoring data for structural condition assessment. Fourth international workshop on structural control, IASC, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lau DT, Brown T, Cheung MS, Li WC (2004) Dynamic modelling and behaviour of the Confederation Bridge. Can J Civil Eng 31:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringOttawa-Carleton Bridge Research Institute, Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations