Skip to main content

Strategies to Exploit Test Data in Subsystem Subtraction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Experimental Dynamic Substructuring, Volume 2

Abstract

In dynamic substructuring, the subtraction of subystems (decoupling) is a very critical problem even in apparently trivial applications. Using simulated FRF data, it has been highlighted that - as predicted by the theory - the solution of decoupling problems is affected by ill-conditioning around a discrete number of frequencies, and is dependent on the choice of the ‘measured DoFs’. In experimental dynamic substructuring, additional problems can arise (systematic errors, inconsistencies, etc.) that are strictly connected with the use of measured FRFs, and different strategies to obtain reliable results can be necessary. In this paper, experimental data, acquired on a test bed made by a plate and a rigid mass, are used to check the decoupling procedure and to look for additional issues that can not be observed from simulated data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jetmundsen B, Bielawa R, Flannelly W (1988) Generalised frequency domain substructure synthesis. J Am Helicopter Soc 33(1):55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Klerk D, Rixen DJ, Voormeeren S (2008) General framework for dynamic substructuring: history, review, and classification of techniques. AIAA J 46(5):1169–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Klerk D (2009) Dynamic response characterization of complex systems through operational identification and dynamic substructuring. Ph.D. thesis, TU Delft

    Google Scholar 

  4. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2008) Promises and pitfalls of decoupling procedures. In: Proceedings of 26th IMAC, Orlando, USA, Feb 2008

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sjövall P, Abrahamsson T (2008) Substructure system identification from coupled system test data. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(1):15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vormeeren SN, Rixen DJ (2010) A dual approach to substructure decoupling techniques. In: Proceedings of 28th IMAC, Jacksonville, USA, Feb 2010

    Google Scholar 

  7. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2010) The role of interface DoFs in decoupling of substructures based on the dual domain decomposition. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(7):2035–2048. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.05.007; also in Proceedings of ISMA 2010, 1863–1880, Leuven, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  8. Voormeeren SN, Rixen DJ (2012) A family of substructure decoupling techniques based on a dual assembly approach. Mech Syst Signal Process 27:379–396. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2011) Direct decoupling of substructures using primal and dual formulation. In: Conference proceedings of the society of experimental mechanics series, vol 4. Linking models and experiments, vol 2, Jacksonville, FL, USA, 31 Jan–3 Feb 2011. Springer, New York, pp 47–76

    Google Scholar 

  10. D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2012) Direct hybrid formulation for substructure decoupling. In: Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series, vol 27. Topics in experimental dynamics substructuring and wind turbine dynamics, vol 2, Jacksonville, FL, USA, 30 Jan–2 Feb 2012, pp 89–107

    Google Scholar 

  11. van der Walk J, van Wuijckhuijse D, de Klerk D (2010) A benchmark test structure for experimental dynamic substructuring. In: Proceedings of 28th IMAC, Jacksonville, USA, Feb 2010

    Google Scholar 

  12. Culla A, D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2012) Getting a symmetric residue matrix from the poly-reference least square complex frequency domain technique. In: Sas P (ed) Proceedings of ISMA 2012 - international conference on noise and vibration engineering, Leuven, Belgium, Sep 2012, pp 2755–2764

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by grants from University of Rome La Sapienza and University of L’Aquila. The authors acknowledge the Substructuring group of TU Delft for providing a specimen of the test-bed structure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter D’Ambrogio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

D’Ambrogio, W., Fregolent, A. (2014). Strategies to Exploit Test Data in Subsystem Subtraction. In: Mayes, R., Rixen, D., Allen, M. (eds) Topics in Experimental Dynamic Substructuring, Volume 2. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6540-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6540-9_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6539-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6540-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics