Abstract
With more than 34 million people currently living with HIV and 1.8 million dying from HIV annually, there is a great need for continued HIV control efforts. However, funds for HIV prevention and treatment continue to fall short of estimated need and are further jeopardized by the current global economic downturn. Thus, efficient allocation of resources among interventions for preventing and treating HIV is crucial. Decision makers, who face budget constraints and other practical considerations, need tools to help them identify sets of interventions that will yield optimal results for their specific settings in terms of their demographic, epidemic, cultural, and economic contexts and resources available to them. Existing theoretical models are often too complex for practical use by decision makers, whereas the practical tools that have been developed are often too simple. As a result, decisions are often made based on historical patterns, political interests, and decision maker heuristics, and may not make the most effective use of limited HIV control resources. To address this gap between theory and practice, we developed a planning tool for use by regional and country-level decision makers in evaluating potential resource allocations. The Resource Allocation for Control of HIV (REACH) model, implemented in Microsoft Excel, has a user-friendly design and allows users to customize key parameters to their own setting, such as demographics, epidemic characteristics and transmission modes, and economic setting. In addition, the model incorporates epidemic dynamics; accounts for how intervention effectiveness depends on the target population and the level of scale up; captures benefit and cost differentials for combinations of interventions versus single interventions, including both treatment and prevention interventions; incorporates key constraints on potential funding allocations; identifies optimal or near-optimal solutions based on epidemic characteristics, local realities, and available level of investment; and estimates the impact of HIV interventions on the health care system and resulting resource needs. In this chapter we describe the model and then present example analyses for three different settings, Uganda, Ukraine, and Saint Petersburg, Russia. We conclude with a discussion of insights gained from application of the model thus far, and we describe our ongoing work in further developing and applying the model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
United Nations (UN) (2009) The millennium development goals report 2009. United Nations, New York, NY
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) (2010) UNAIDS Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic 2010. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
Avila C (2011) Personal communication: updated estimates for HIV resource needs. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
Cohen MS et al. (2011) Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. New Engl J Med 365(6):493–505
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) (2008) Report on the global AIDS epidemic. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
Alistar SS, Brandeau ML (2012) Decision making for HIV prevention and treatment scale up: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Med Decis Making 32(1):105–117 Epub ahead of print
Lasry AC, Malvankar MW, Zaric GS (2011) Allocating funds for HIV/AIDS: the case of kwaDukuza, South Africa. Health Policy Plann 26(1):33–42
Ruiz M et al. (eds) (2001) No time to lose: getting more from HIV prevention. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Coates TJ, Richter L, Caceres C (2008) Behavioural strategies to reduce HIV transmission: how to make them work better. Lancet 372(9639):669–684
Piot P et al. (2008) Coming to terms with complexity: a call to action for HIV prevention. Lancet 372(9641):845–859
Potts M et al. (2008) Reassessing HIV prevention. Science 320(5877):749–750
Collins C, Coates TJ, Curran J (2008) Moving beyond the alphabet soup of HIV prevention. AIDS 22(Suppl 2):S5–S8
Horton R, Das P (2008) Putting prevention at the forefront of HIV/AIDS. Lancet 372(9637):421–422
Bautista-Arredondo S et al. (2008) Optimizing resource allocation for HIV/AIDS prevention programmes: an analytical framework. AIDS 22(Suppl 1):S67–S74
Brandeau ML, Zaric GS (2009) Optimal investment in HIV prevention programs: more is not always better. Health Care Manage Sci 12(1):27–37
Kumaranayake L (2008) The economics of scaling up: cost estimation for HIV/AIDS interventions. AIDS 22:S23–S33
Long EF, Brandeau ML, Owens DK (2010) The cost effectiveness and population outcomes of expanded HIV screening in the United States. Ann Intern Med 153(12):778–789
Alistar SS, Owens DK, Brandeau ML (2011) Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of expanding harm reduction and antiretroviral therapy in a mixed HIV epidemic: a modeling analysis for Ukraine. PLoS Med 8(3):e1000423
Dandona L et al. (2008) Changing cost of HIV interventions in the context of scaling-up in India. AIDS 22(Suppl 1):S43–S49
Kaplan EH (1995) Economic analysis of needle exchange. AIDS 9(10):1113–1119
Lasry A, Richter A, Lutscher F (2009) Recommendations for increasing the use of HIV/AIDS resource allocation models. BMC Public Health 9 (Suppl 1):S8
Brandeau ML, Zaric GS, Richter A (2003) Resource allocation for control of infectious diseases in multiple independent populations: beyond cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ 22(4):575–598
Richter A, Brandeau ML, Owens DK (1999) An analysis of optimal resource allocation for prevention of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in injection drug users and non-users. Med Decis Making 19(2):167–179
Zaric GS, Brandeau ML (2001) Optimal investment in a portfolio of HIV prevention programs. Med Decis Making 21(5):391–408
Zaric GS, Brandeau ML (2001) Resource allocation for epidemic control over short time horizons. Math Biosci 171(1):33–58
Futures Group (2011) Goals model. http://futuresgroup.com/resources/software/goals-model/. Accessed 8 Feb 2011
Brandeau ML, Zaric GS, De Angelis V (2005) Improved allocation of HIV prevention resources: using information about prevention program production functions. Health Care Manage Sci 8(1):19–28
Marseille E et al. (2007) HIV prevention costs and program scale: data from the PANCEA project in five low and middle-income countries. BMC Health Serv Res 7(1):108
Long EF et al. (2006) Slowing the HIV epidemic in St. Petersburg, Russia: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of expanded antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 20(17):2207–2215
Zaric GS, Brandeau ML, Barnett PG (2000) Methadone maintenance treatment and HIV prevention: a cost effectiveness analysis. Manage Sci 46(8):1013–1031
Sanders GD et al. (2005) Cost effectiveness of screening for HIV in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. New Engl J Med 352(6):32–47
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) (2007) Practical guidelines for intensifying HIV prevention—towards universal access. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
Government of Uganda (2010) United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) country progress report, Uganda: January 2008—December 2009. Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) (2008) Ukraine—national report on monitoring progress towards the UNGASS declaration of commitment on HIV/AIDS. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
Kruglov YV et al. (2008) The most severe HIV epidemic in Europe: Ukraine's national HIV prevalence estimates for 2007. Sex Transm Infect 84(Suppl 1):i37–i41
Heimer R, White E (2010) Estimation of the number of injection drug users in St. Petersburg, Russia. Drug Alcohol Depend 109(1–3):79–83
World Health Organization (WHO) (2005) Summary country profile for HIV/AIDS treatment scale-up: Russian Federation, June 2005. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Niccolai LM et al. (2009) The potential for bridging of HIV transmission in the Russian Federation: sex risk behaviors and HIV prevalence among drug users (DUs) and their non-DU sex partners. J Urban Health 85(Suppl 1):131–143
Niccolai LM et al. (2010) High HIV prevalence, suboptimal HIV testing, and low knowledge of HIV-positive serostatus among injection drug users in St. Petersburg, Russia. AIDS Behav 14(4):932–941
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) (2011) Toward an improved framework for HIV investments, draft report. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grant number R01-DA15612 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Sabina Alistar was also supported by a Stanford Graduate Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alistar, S.S., Brandeau, M.L., Beck, E.J. (2013). REACH: A Practical HIV Resource Allocation Tool for Decision Makers. In: Zaric, G. (eds) Operations Research and Health Care Policy. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 190. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6507-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6507-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6506-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6507-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)