Skip to main content

The Ideology Behind DSM-5

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Making the DSM-5

Abstract

DSM-5 has built its classification on an ideological position: that mental disorders can be fully explained by neuroscience, and that there is no boundary between pathology and normality. This point of view could lead to diagnostic inflation, inflated estimates of prevalence, medicalization of normal variations, and overtreatment, implications that are documented for several groups of disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kuhn TA. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kraepelin, E. Manic-depressive insanity and paranoia (R. M. Barclay, Trans.). Robertson GM, editor. Edinburgh: E & S Livingstone; 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klerman G. Historical perspectives on contemporary schools of psychopathology. In: Millon T, Klerman G, editors. Contemporary psychopathology: towards the DSM-IV. New York: Guilford; 1986. p. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Insel T, Quirion R. Psychiatry as a clinical neuroscience discipline. JAMA. 2005;294:2221–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry. 1980; 137:535–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gold I. Reduction in psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry. 2009;54:506–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kupfer DJ, Regier DA. Neuroscience, clinical evidence, and the future of psychiatric classification in DSM-5. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:172–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Insel TR. A strategic plan for research on mental illness: translating scientific opportunity into public health impact. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:128–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlat D. Unhinged. New York: Free Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paris J. Prescriptions for the mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leucht S, Hierl S, Kissling W, Dold M, Davis JM. Putting the efficacy of psychiatric and general medicine medication into perspective: review of meta-analyses. Br J Psychiatry. 2012; 200:97–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horwitz AV, Wakefield JC. The loss of sadness: how psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Taylor A, Kokaua J. How common are common mental disorders? Evidence that lifetime prevalence rates are doubled by prospective versus retrospective ascertainment. Psychol Med. 2009;940:899–909.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pratt LA, Brody DJ, Gu Q. Antidepressant use in persons aged 12 and over: United States, 2005–2008. NCHS data brief, no 76. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horwitz AV, Wakefield JC. All we have to fear: psychiatry's transformation of natural anxieties into mental disorders. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carpenter WT. Anticipating DSM-V: should psychosis risk become a diagnostic class? Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:841–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cannon TD, Cadenhead K, Cornblatt B, Woods SW, Addington J, Walker E, et al. Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:28–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Akiskal HS. The bipolar spectrum: the shaping of a new paradigm in psychiatry. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2002;4:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Angst J, Gamma A. A new bipolar spectrum concept: a brief review. Bipolar Disord. 2002; 4:11–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Merikangas KR, Akiskal HS, Angst J, Greenberg PE, Hirschfeld RM, Petukhova M, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of bipolar spectrum disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:543–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Paris J. The bipolar spectrum—diagnosis or fad? New York: Routledge; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brugha TS, McManus S, Bankart J. Epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders in adults in the community in England. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68:459–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim YS, Leventhal BL, Koh Y-J, Fombonne E, Laska E, Lim EC, et al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in a total population sample. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(9):904–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Batstra L, Frances AJ. DSM-5 further inflates attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012;200:486–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Paris J. Estimating the prevalence of personality disorders. J Pers Disord. 2010;24:405–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Frances, A. DSM-5: “Addiction” swallows substance abuse. Psychiatric Times. March 30,2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Paris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paris, J. (2013). The Ideology Behind DSM-5. In: Paris, J., Phillips, J. (eds) Making the DSM-5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6504-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6504-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6503-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6504-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics