Abstract
DSM-5, along with its predecessors, claims to be no more less than a classification of psychiatric disorders. Each DSM aspires to carry out this classification mission in a scientific manner, organizing the world of psychopathology in the most scientifically acceptable manner at the time of its inscription. The authors of the successive manuals would thus be reluctant to see their creations as historical, cultural, ideological products rather than as scientific documents. The chapters in this section challenge the stated goals of the manuals by embedding the DSMs in their political contexts. In these other settings, the manuals become more and less than simple scientific nosologies: more in the sense that they are expressive of larger cultural themes; less in the sense that their science is inevitably thrown into question.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kupfer DJ, Regier DA. Neuroscience, clinical evidence, and the future of psychiatric classification in DSM-5. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:172–4.
Robins E, Guze SB. Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: its application to schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1970;126:983–7.
Compton WM, Guze SB. The neo-Kraepelinian revolution in psychiatric diagnosis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995;245:196–201.
Flanagan EH, Davidson L, Strauss JS. Issues for DSM-5: incorporating patients’ subjective experiences. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:391–2.
Flanagan EH, Davidson L, Strauss JS. The need for patient-subjective data in the DSM and the ICD. Psychiatry. 2010;73:297–307.
Cuthbert B, Insel T. The data of diagnosis: new approaches to psychiatric classification. Psychiatry. 2010;73:311–4.
Phillips J, Frances A, et al. The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: a pluralogue. Part 1: conceptual and definitional issues in psychiatric diagnosis. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2012;7(3):1–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Phillips, J. (2013). Conclusion. In: Paris, J., Phillips, J. (eds) Making the DSM-5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6504-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6504-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6503-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6504-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)