The Evolution of Educational Technology Based on a Bibliometric Study

  • Tassos A. Mikropoulos
  • Demetrios G. Sampson
  • Alexandros Nikopoulos
  • Panayotis Pintelas


Educational technology and technology-enhanced learning are now mature interdisciplinary research areas, and there are already literature studies aiming at the study of scientific communities, the identification and evolution of salient topics, and the emergence of the trends in the field. Such studies are important since they can provide insights into the development of a particular research area. In this chapter, we aim to investigate the evolution of the educational technology field in a European Union member state, namely, Greece, through the analysis of trends between three different categories of targeted research outcomes (theory, technology, practice) and the corresponding key topics of interest that have been emerged in all papers presented at the main national scientific conference of this field between 2000 and 2012. The analysis of the results demonstrates that there is a wide involvement of researchers in technology-supported educational innovations at schools and less basic and applied technological research, indicating the need for a more balanced research both in theoretical issues and technological aspects.


Educational Technology European Union Member State Authoring Tool Learning Design Category Concern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Alexandros Nikopoulos’ work was partly financially supported by a grant from the Hellenic Scientific Association for ICT in Education.


  1. Cho, Y., Park, S., Jo, S. J., & Suh, S. (2013). The landscape of educational technology viewed from the ETR&D journal. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haythornthwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-learning: Theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Kinshuk, Huang, H.-W., Sampson, D. G., & Chen, N.-S. (2013). Trends in educational technology through the lens of the highly cited articles published in the Journal of Educational Technology and Society. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 3–20.Google Scholar
  6. Klein, J. D. (1997). ETR&D-Development: An analysis of content and survey of future direction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. LeBaron, J., & McDonough, E. (2009). Research report for GeSCI meta-review of ICT in education. Retrieved January 24, 2013 from
  8. Masood, M. (2004). A ten year analysis: Trends in traditional educational technology literature. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 1(2), 73–91.Google Scholar
  9. Muñoz-Leiva, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., & Martínez-Fiestas, M. (2013). Detecting salient themes in financial marketing research from 1961 to 2010. The Service Industries Journal, 9–10, 925–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pham, M. C., Derntl, M., & Klamma, R. (2012). Development patterns of scientific communities in technology enhanced learning. Educational Technology and Society, 15(3), 323–335.Google Scholar
  11. Randolph, J. J., Julnes, G., Bednarik, R., & Sutinen, E. (2007). A comparison of the methodological quality of articles in computer science education journals and conference proceedings. Computer Science Education, 17(4), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Randolph, J., Bednarik, R., Silander, P., Gonzalez, J., Myller, N., & Sutinen, E. (2005). A critical analysis of the research methodologies reported in the full papers of the proceedings of ICALT 2004. In D. G. Sampson, P. Godyear, Kinshuk, D. J. Yang, & T. Okamoto (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5 th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2005) (pp. 10–14). Kaohsiung, Taiwan: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  13. Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  14. Rourke, L., Anerson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8–22.Google Scholar
  15. Spector, J. M. (2012). Foundations of educational technology. New York, NY: Routheldge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tassos A. Mikropoulos
    • 1
  • Demetrios G. Sampson
    • 2
  • Alexandros Nikopoulos
    • 1
  • Panayotis Pintelas
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Primary EducationUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece
  2. 2.Department of Digital SystemsUniversity of Piraeus and CERTH-ITIPiraeusGreece
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsUniversity of PatrasRioGreece

Personalised recommendations