Where Do We Go from Here? How Addressing Clinical Complexities Will Result in Improved Therapeutic Outcomes

Chapter

Abstract

The past several decades have been characterized by significant advancements in the understanding and treatment of psychiatric diagnoses. Well-conceptualized and empirically supported interventions/approaches are in place for virtually all of the disorders covered in the book, and new studies are rapidly coming out that provide further insight into mental health treatments that work. Although encouraging and a marked step forward, straightforward, uncomplicated presentations are often the exception rather than the rule in terms of the individuals included in these trials. Yet, in applied practice, clinical presentations characterized by varied complexities are common and can markedly impact treatment course and outcome without appropriately consideration. The purpose of this book is to advance the literature beyond the understanding that a particular treatment, on average, works for the average person with the corresponding disorder. Rather, it is our hope that this two-series volume increases the application of personalized care in the mental health treatment of adults and children who present as clinically complex.

Keywords

Depression 

References

  1. Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dimidjian, S., & Hollon, S. (2010). How would we know if psychotherapy were harmful? American Psychologist, 65, 21–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Keeley, M. L., Storch, E. A., Merlo, L. J., & Geffken, G. R. (2008). Clinical predictors of response to cognitive-behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 118–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Klepac, R. K., Ronan, G. F., Andrasik, F., Arnold, K. D., Belar, C. D., Berry, S. L., et al. (in press). Guidelines for cognitive-behavioral training within doctoral psychology programs in the United States: Report of the inter-organizational task force on cognitive and behavioral psychology doctoral education. Behavior Therapy.Google Scholar
  5. Meehl, P. E. (1973). Why I do not attend case conferences. In P. E. Meehl (Ed.), Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers (pp. 225–302). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Paul, G. L. (1969). Behavior modification research: Design and tactics. In C. M. Franks (Ed.), Behavior therapy: Appraisal and status (pp. 29–62). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Rachman, S. (1991). A psychological approach to the study of comorbidity. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Silk, K. R. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Personality and Mental Health, 4, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Storch, E. A., Merlo, L. J., Larson, M., Geffken, G. R., Lehmkuhl, H. D., Jacob, M. L., et al. (2008). The impact of comorbidity on cognitive-behavioral therapy response in pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 583–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Treat, T. A., Bootzin, R. R., & Baker, T. B. (2007). Psychological clinical science: Papers in honor of Richard M. McFall. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  11. Weisz, J. R., Chorpita, B. F., Palinkas, L. A., Schoenwald, S. K., Miranda, J., Bearman, S. K., et al. (2012). Testing standard and modular designs for psychotherapy treating depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in youth: A randomized effectiveness trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69, 274–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyFordham UniversityBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations