Advertisement

Distribution of Individuals

  • Marcelo Hernán Cassini
Chapter
  • 1.4k Downloads

Abstract

The distribution of individuals is a field mainly studied by behavioural sciences. It is largely concerned with animals, although some models can be applied to plants. Behavioural ecologists study decision rules that follow non-sessile individuals on when to start a movement; speed and direction of a movement; sites at which to stop, forage, be vigilant, or rest; and time spent for each activity. The result of these behaviours is an individual pattern of habitat use. Measured along the life of an animal, this pattern demarcates a home range. This chapter begins with a description of movement strategies in animals as mechanisms that result in an individual pattern of distribution. It is followed by two sections that discuss two types of descriptive models of individual habitat use: home-range estimations and site suitability models. The analytical approach is presented in the following two sections, and it is based on foraging theory, which developed models to predict residence times in foraging areas and to resolve the trade-off between forage and defence against predators. The chapter concludes with an analysis of the expected distributions at equilibrium.

Keywords

Home Range Predation Risk Patch Type Spider Monkey Minimum Convex Polygon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abba AM, Cassini MH (2008) Ecology and conservation of three species of armadillos in the Pampean Region, Argentina. In: Vizcaino S, Loughry J (eds) Biology of the Xenarthra. University of Florida Press, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  2. Abba AM, Cassini MH (2010) Ecological segregation between two sympatric species of armadillos (Xenarthra, Mammalia) with different masticatory morphology. Acta Theriol 55:35–44Google Scholar
  3. Anderson DJ (1982) The home range: a new nonparametric estimation technique. Ecology 63:103–112Google Scholar
  4. Baker RR (1978) The evolutionary ecology of animal migration. Hodder & Sotughton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartumeus F, Levin SA (2008) Fractal intermittence in locomotion: linking animal behavior to statistical patterns of search. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19072–19077Google Scholar
  6. Bartumeus F, Da Luz MGE, Viswanathan GM, Catalan J (2005) Animal search strategies: a quantitative random-walk analysis. Ecology 86:3078–3087Google Scholar
  7. Bascompte J, Vilà C (1997) Fractals and search paths in mammals. Landsc Ecol 12:13–221Google Scholar
  8. Baum WM (1981) Changing over and choice. In: Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E, Lowe CF (eds) Quantification of steady-state operant behaviour. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 118–135Google Scholar
  9. Bell AD (1984) Dynamic morphology: a contribution to plant population ecology. In: Dirzo R, Sarukhan J (eds) Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 48–65Google Scholar
  10. Bell WJ (1991) Searching behavior: the behavioral ecology of finding resources. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Bennett ATD (1996) Do animals have cognitive maps? J Exp Biol 199:219–224Google Scholar
  12. Boyer D, Ramos Fernández G, Miramontes O, Mateos JL, Cocho G, Larralde H, Ramos H, Rojas F (2006) Scale-free foraging by primates emerges from their interaction with a complex environment. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1743–1750Google Scholar
  13. Brown JS (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47Google Scholar
  14. Burt WH (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts ad applied to mammals. J Mammal 24:346–352Google Scholar
  15. Cassini MH (1993) Searching strategies within food patches in the armadillo Chaetophractus vellerosus. Anim Behav 46:400–402Google Scholar
  16. Cassini MH, Krebs JR (1994) Behavioural responses to food addition by hedgehogs. Ecography 17:289–296Google Scholar
  17. Cassini MH, Kacelnik A, Segura ET (1990) The tale of the Screaming Hairy Armadillo, the Guinea Pig and the marginal value theorem. Anim Behav 39:1030–1050Google Scholar
  18. Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136Google Scholar
  19. Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1994) Hippocampal growth and attrition in birds affected by experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:7410–7414Google Scholar
  20. Dalziel BD, Morales JM, Fryxell JM (2008) Fitting probability distributions to animal movement trajectories: using artificial neural networks to link distance, resources, and memory. Am Nat 172:248–258Google Scholar
  21. Damschen EI, Brudvig LA, Haddad NM, Levey DJ, Orrock JL, Tewksbury JJ (2008) The movement ecology and dynamics of plant communities in fragmented landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19078–19083Google Scholar
  22. de Kroon H, Visser EJW, Huber H, Mommer L, Hutchings MJ (2009) A modular concept of plant foraging behaviour: the interplay between local responses and systemic control. Plant Cell Environ 32:704–712Google Scholar
  23. Dixon KR, Chapman JA (1980) Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas. Ecology 61:1040–1044Google Scholar
  24. Doncaster CP, Macdonald DW (1991) Drifting territoriality in the red fox Vulpes vulpes. J Anim Ecol 60:423–439Google Scholar
  25. Dukas R, Ratcliffe J (2009) Cognitive ecology II. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Dussault C, Ouellet JP, Courtois R, Huot J, Breton L, Jolicoeur H (2005) Linking moose habitat selection to limiting factors. Ecography 28:619–628Google Scholar
  27. Dyer FC (1998) Cognitive exology of navigation. In: Dukas R (ed) Cognitive ecology. The evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 201–260Google Scholar
  28. Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2001) Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays. Nature 414:443–446Google Scholar
  29. Getz WM, Saltz D (2008) A framework for generating and analyzing movement paths on ecological landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19066–19071Google Scholar
  30. Giuggioli L, Bartumeus F (2010) Animal movement, search strategies and behavioural ecology: a cross-disciplinary way forward. J Appl Ecol 79:906–909Google Scholar
  31. Godley BJ, Blumenthal JM, Broderick AC, Coyne MS, Godfrey MH, Hawkes LA (2008) Satellite tracking of sea turtles: where have we been and where do we go next? Endanger Species Res 4:3–22Google Scholar
  32. Gould JL (1982) Ethology. The mechanisms and evolution of behavior. WW Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Greegor DH Jr (1985) Ecology of the little hairy armadillo Chaetophractus vellerosus. In: Montgomery GG (ed) The evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 397–405Google Scholar
  34. Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, ChischesterGoogle Scholar
  35. Gurarie E, Andrews RD, Laidre KL (2009) A novel method for identifying behavioural changes in animal movement data. Ecol Lett 12:395–408Google Scholar
  36. Hayne DW (1949) Calculation of size of home range. J Mammal 30:1–18Google Scholar
  37. Herrnstein RJ (1961) Relative and absolute strength of responses as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 4:267–272Google Scholar
  38. Holyoak M, Casagrandi R, Nathan R, Revilla E, Splegel O (2008) Trends and missing parts in the study of movement ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19060–19065Google Scholar
  39. Hutchings MJ, de Kroon H (1994) Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Adv Ecol Res 25:159–238Google Scholar
  40. Jacob J, Brown JS (2000) Microhabitat use, giving-up densities and temporal activity as short- and long-term anti-predator behaviors in common voles. Oikos 91:131–138Google Scholar
  41. Jacobs LF, Schenk F (2003) Unpacking the cognitive map: the parallel map theory of hippocampal function. Psychol Rev 110:285–315Google Scholar
  42. Jander R (1975) Ecological aspects of spatial orientation. Annu Rev Syst Ecol 6:171–188Google Scholar
  43. Jarrel KF, McBride MJ (2008) The surprisingly diverse ways that prokaryotes move. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:466–476Google Scholar
  44. Jennrich RI, Turner FB (1969) Measurement of non-circular home range. J Theor Biol 22:227–237Google Scholar
  45. Keating KA, Cherry S (2004) Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat selection studies. J Wildl Manage 68:774–789Google Scholar
  46. Lohmann KJ, Putman NF, Lohmann CMF (2008) Geomagnetic imprinting: a unifiying hypothesis of long-distance natal homing in salmon and sea turtles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19096–19101Google Scholar
  47. Mandel JT, Bildsteinb KL, Bohrerc G, Winklera DW (2008) Movement ecology of migration in turkey vultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19102–19107Google Scholar
  48. Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Medri I, Mourão G (2005) Home range of giant anteaters (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. J Zool (Lond) 266:365–375Google Scholar
  50. Morris PA (1991a) Hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus. In: Corbet GB, Hams S (eds) The handbook of Bntish mammals. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 37–43Google Scholar
  51. Morris DW (1991b) On the evolutionary stability of dispersal to sink habitats. Am Nat 137:907–911Google Scholar
  52. Nathan R (2008) An emerging movement ecology paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19050–19051Google Scholar
  53. Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D, Smouse PE (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19052–19059Google Scholar
  54. Nonacs P (2001) State dependent behavior and the Marginal Value Theorem. Behav Ecol 12:71–83Google Scholar
  55. Ovaskainen O, Smith AD, Osborne JL, Reynolds RD, Carreck NL, Martin AP, Niitepõld K, Hanski I (2008) Tracking butterfly movements with harmonic radar reveals an effect of population age on movement distance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19090–19095Google Scholar
  56. Oyugi JO, Brown JS (2003) Giving-up densities and habitat preference of European Starlings and American Robins. Condor 105:130–135Google Scholar
  57. Patterson TA, Basson M, Bravington MV, Gunn JS (2009) Classifying movement behaviour in relation to environmental conditions using hidden Markov models. J Anim Ecol 78:1113–1123Google Scholar
  58. Petty JT, Gary D, Grossman (2010) Giving-up densities and ideal pre-emptive patch use in a predatory benthic stream fish. Freshw Biol 55:780–793Google Scholar
  59. Powell RA (2000) Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In: Boitani L, Fuller TK (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 65–110Google Scholar
  60. Ramos-Fernández G, Mateos JL, Miramontes O, Larralde H, Cocho G, Ayala Orozco B (2004) Lévy walk patterns in the foraging movements of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:223–230Google Scholar
  61. Shaw JH, Machado Neto J, Carter TS (1987) Behavior of free-living giant anteaters (Myrmecophaga tridactyla). Biotropica 19:255–259Google Scholar
  62. Slade AJ, Hutchings MJ (1987) The effects of nutrient availability on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. J Ecol 75:95–112Google Scholar
  63. Smouse PE, Focardi S, Moorcroft PR, Kie JG, Forester JD, Morales JM (2010) Stochastic modelling of animal movement. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:2201–2211Google Scholar
  64. Staddon JER (1983) Adaptive behaviour and learning. University of Cambridge Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  65. Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  66. Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg (2007) Foraging: behavior and ecology. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  67. Sutherland WJ (1996) From individual behaviour to population ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  68. Tinbergen N (1963) On aims and methods in ethology. Z Tierpsychol 20:410–433Google Scholar
  69. Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55:189–208Google Scholar
  70. Urbano F, Cagnacci F, Calenge C, Dettki H, Cameron A, Neteler M (2010) Wildlife tracking data management: a new vision. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:2177–2185Google Scholar
  71. Viswanathan GM, Buldyrev SV, Havlin S, da Luz MGE, Raposo EP, Stanley HE (1999) Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature 401:911–914Google Scholar
  72. Wroot AJ (1984) Feeding ecology of the European hedgehog, Erinaceus europaeus L. Ph D thesis, University of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang HP, Be’er A, Florin EL, Swinney HL (2010) Collective motion and density fluctuations in bacterial colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:13626–13630Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcelo Hernán Cassini
    • 1
  1. 1.National Scientific and Technical Research Council & Luján UniversityBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations