• John M. deMan
Part of the Food Science Text Series book series (FSTS)


Food texture can be defined as the way in which the various constituents and structural elements are arranged and combined into a micro- and macrostructure and the external manifestations of this structure in terms of flow and deformation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bell, A.E. 1989. Gel structure and food biopolymers. In Water and food quality, ed. T.M. Hardman. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  2. Bjorksten, J., et al. 1967. A portable rotating knife ten- derometer. Food Technol. 21: 84-86.Google Scholar
  3. Bourne, M.C. 1966. Measure of shear and compression components of puncture tests. J. Food Sci. 31: 282-291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourne, M.C. 1987. Effects of water activity on textural properties of food. In Water activity: Theory and applications to food, ed. L.B. Rockland and L.R. Beuchat. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  5. Brandt, M.A., et al. 1963. Texture profile method. J. Food Sci. 28: 404-409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bratzler, L.J. 1932. Measuring the tenderness of meat by means of a mechanical shear. Master's thesis, Kansas State College.Google Scholar
  7. Cairncross, S.E., and L.B. Sjöström. 1950. Flavor profiles—A new approach to flavor problems. Food Technol. 4: 308-311.Google Scholar
  8. Chawla, R, and J.M. deMan. 1990. Measurement of the size distribution of fat crystals using a laser particle counter. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 67: 329-332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. deMan, J.M. 1969. Food texture measurements with the penetration method. J. Texture Studies 1: 114-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. deMan, J.M. 1997. Relationship between chemical, physical and textural properties of fats. Paper presented at International Conference on Physical Properties of Fats, Oils, Emulsifiers, September, Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. deMan, J.M., and A.M. Beers. 1987. Fat crystal networks: Structure and rheological properties. J. Texture Studies 18: 303-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. deMan, J.M., and F.W. Wood. 1959. Hardness of butter. II. Influence of setting. J. Dairy Sci. 42: 56-61.Google Scholar
  13. deMan, J.M., et al. 1985. Viscoelastic properties of plastic fat products. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 62: 1672-1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. deMan, L., et al. 1991. Physical and textural characteristics of some North American shortenings. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 68: 63-69.Google Scholar
  15. deMan, L., and J.M. deMan. 1996. Textural measurements of some plastic fats: Oils, fats, lipids. Proceedings of the International Society for Fat Research (ISF), the Hague 1995, 3: 543-546. Bridgewater, UK: P.J. Barnes & Assoc.Google Scholar
  16. Haighton, A.J. 1959. The measurement of hardness of margarine and fats with the penetrometers. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 36: 345-348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heertje, I., et al. 1985. Structure formation in acid milk gels. Food Microstructure 4: 267-278.Google Scholar
  18. Heertje, I., et al. 1987. Product morphology of fat products. Food Microstructure 6: 1-8.Google Scholar
  19. Hermansson, A.M., and K. Larsson. 1986. The structure of gluten gels. Food Microstructure 5: 233-240.Google Scholar
  20. Howard, R.D., and M.D. Judge. 1968. Comparison of sarcomere length to other predictors of beef tenderness. J. Food Sci. 33: 456-460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johansson, D., and B. Bergenstahl. 1995. Sintering of fat crystals in oil during post-crystallization processes. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 72: 911-920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnston, C.W., and C.H. Brower. 1966. Rheological and gelation measurements of plastisols. Soc. Plastics Eng. J. 22, no. 11: 45-52.Google Scholar
  23. Kamel, B.S., and J.M. deMan. 1975. Evaluation of gelatin gel texture by penetration tests. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 8: 123-127.Google Scholar
  24. Kapsalis, J.G., et al. 1970. A physico-chemical study of the mechanical properties of low and intermediate moisture foods. J. Texture Studies 1: 464-483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katz, E.E., and T.P. Labuza. 1981. Effect of water activity on the sensory crispness and mechanical deformation of snack food properties. J. Food Sci. 46: 403-409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kleinert, J. 1976. Rheology of chocolate. In Rheology and texture in food quality, ed. J.M deMan et al. Westport, CT: AVI Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  27. Kokini, J.L. 1985. Fluid and semi-solid food texture and texture-taste interactions. Food Technol. 11: 86-94.Google Scholar
  28. Kramer, A. 1961. The Shear-Press, a basic tool for the food technologist. Food Scientist 5: 7-16.Google Scholar
  29. Kramer, A., and J.C. Cooler. 1962. An instrumental method for measuring quality of raw and canned sweet corn. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 81: 421-427.Google Scholar
  30. Kruger, L.H., and R. Murray. 1976. Starch texture. In Rheology and texture in food quality, ed. J.M. deMan et al. Westport, CT: AVI Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  31. Levine, H., and L. Slade. 1992. Glass transitions in foods. In Physical chemistry of foods ed. H.G. Schwartzberg and R.W. Hartel. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  32. Miyada, D.S., and A.L. Tappel. 1956. Meat tenderiza- tion. I. Two mechanical devices for measuring texture. Food Technol. 10: 142-145.Google Scholar
  33. Mohsenin, N.N. 1970. Physical properties of plant and animal materials, Vol. 1 Structure, physical characteristics and mechanical properties. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publisher. Google Scholar
  34. Morrow, C.T., and N.N. Mohsenin. 1966. Consideration of selected agricultural products as viscoelastic materials. J. FoodSci. 31: 686-698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oakenfull, D. 1984. A method for using measurements of shear modulus to estimate the size and thermodynamic stability of junction zones in non-covalently cross linked gels. J. Food Sci. 49: 1103-1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prentice, J.H. 1954. An instrument for estimating the spreadability of butter. Lab. Practice 3: 186-189.Google Scholar
  37. Proctor, B.E., et al. 1956. A recording strain-gage denture tenderometer for foods. II. Studies on the masticatory force and motion and the force penetration relationship. Food Technol. 10: 327-331.Google Scholar
  38. Reeve, R.M., and M.S. Brown. 1968a. Histological development of the bean pod as related to culinary texture. 1. Early stages of pod development. J. Food Sci. 33: 321-326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reeve, R.M., and M.S. Brown. 1968b. Histological development of the bean pod as related to culinary texture. 2. Structure and composition of edible maturity. J. FoodSci. 33: 326-331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roos, Y., and M. Karel. 1991. Plasticizing effect of water on thermal behavior and crystallization of amorphous food models. J. Food Sci. 56: 38-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saravacos, G.D. 1968. Tube viscometry of fruit purees and juices. Food Technol. 22: 1585-1588.Google Scholar
  42. Saravacos, G.D., and J.C. Moyer. 1967. Heating rates of fruit products in an agitated kettle. Food Technol. 21: 372-376.Google Scholar
  43. Scherr, H.J., and L.P. Wittnauer. 1967. The application of a capillary extrusion rheometer to the determination of the flow characteristics of lard. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 44: 275-280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schubert, H. 1987. Food particle technology. Part 1: Properties of particles and particulate food systems. J. Food Eng. 6: 1-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sherman, P. 1969. A texture profile of foodstuffs based upon well-defined rheological properties. J. Food Sci. 34: 458-462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sherman, P. 1973. Structure and textural properties of foods. In Texture measurement of foods, ed. A. Kramer and A.S. Szczesniak. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  47. Shoemaker, C.F., et al. 1987. Instrumentation for rheological measurements of food. Food Technol. 41, no. 3: 80-84.Google Scholar
  48. Slade, L., and H. Levine. 1991. A food polymer science approach to structure-property relationships in aqueous food systems. In Water relationships in foods, ed. H. Levine and L. Slade. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sperring, D.D., et al. 1959. Tenderness in beef muscle as measured by pressure. Food Technol. 13: 155-158.Google Scholar
  50. Steffe, J.F., and F.A. Osorio. 1987. Back extrusion of non-Newtonian fluids. Food Technol. 41, no. 3: 72-77.Google Scholar
  51. Sterling, C. 1968. Effect of solutes and pH on the structure and firmness of cooked carrot. J. Food Technol. 3:367-371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stoner, D.L., et al. 1974. A mechanical model for postmortem striated muscle. J. Texture Studies 4: 483493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Szczesniak, A.S. 1963. Classification of textural characteristics. J. FoodSci. 28: 385-389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Szczesniak, A.S., and D.H. Kleyn. 1963. Consumer awareness of texture and other food attributes. Food Technol. 17: 74-77.Google Scholar
  55. Szczesniak, A.S., et al. 1970. Behavior of different foods in the standard shear compression cell of the shear press and the effect of sample weight on peak area and maximum force. J. Texture Studies 1: 356-378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tanaka, M., et al. 1971. Measurement of textural properties of foods with a constant speed cone penetrometer. J. Texture Studies 2: 301-315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Kleef, F.S.M., et al. 1978. Determination of the number of crosslinks in a protein gel from its mechanical and swelling properties. Biopolymers 17: 225-235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vasic, I., and J.M. deMan. 1967. Measurement of some rheological properties of plastic fat with an extrusion modification of the shear press. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 44: 225-228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vasic, I., and J.M. deMan. 1968. Effect of mechanical treatment on some rheological properties of butter. In Rheology and texture of foods tuffs 251-264. London: Society of Chemical Industry.Google Scholar
  60. Voisey, P.W. 1970. Test cells for objective textural measurements. Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J. 4: 91-103.Google Scholar
  61. Voisey, P.W. 1971. The Ottawa texture measuring system. Can. Inst. FoodSci. Technol. J. 4: 91-103.Google Scholar
  62. Voisey, P.W., and J.M. deMan. 1970. A recording food grinder. Can. Inst. FoodSci. Technol. J. 3: 14-18.Google Scholar
  63. Voisey, P.W., and H. Hansen. 1967. A shear apparatus for meat tenderness evaluation. Food Technol. 21: 37A–42A.Google Scholar
  64. Wehrli, H.P., and Y. Pomeranz. 1969. The role of chemical bonds in dough. Bakers' Digest 43: no. 6: 22–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. deMan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food ScienceUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations