Skip to main content

Problem Posing as Reformulation and Sense-Making Within Problem Solving

  • Chapter
Book cover Mathematical Problem Posing

Part of the book series: Research in Mathematics Education ((RME))

Abstract

This chapter examines a type of problem posing that has received little attention in the mathematics education literature. Silver (For the Learning of Mathematics 14:19–28, 1994) defined within-solution problem posing as “problem formulation or reformulation [that] occurs within the process of problem solving” (p. 19). Our analysis documents and explains the role that within-solution problem posing plays during problem solving, focusing on episodes of students from two grade levels: (a) Two fourth-grade students solving a multiplication task, and (b) A mathematics education graduate student solving a number array task. Our research examines: (a) How problem posing evolves from the students’ ongoing interpretations of problematic situations, and (b) How these posed problems contribute to the students’ problem solving. The results provide an explanation of how problem posing and problem solving coevolve in the course of solution activity and thus indicate the beneficial role that problem posing can play in the solution of mathematics problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Italicized comments are used to indicate the actions performed by the students as observed by the researchers.

  2. 2.

    We use a bracket notation that lists the top-to-bottom rows of the block being considered. For example, the 2 × 2 block is indicated by [1, 2: 2, 4], the 3 × 3 block is indicated by [1, 2, 3: 2, 4, 6: 3, 6, 9].

References

  • Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (1993). The art of problem posing (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J. (1994). A protocol-analytic study of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 6(2), 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J. (1998). An investigation of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem posing and problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Moyer, J., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2012). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 57–69. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9429-3. Online First.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., & McLaughlin, C. (1998). Algorithms in solving non-routine problems. In L. J. Morrow & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), Teaching and learning of algorithms in school mathematics. 1998 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 218–229). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifarelli, V. V., & Cai, J. (2005). The evolution of mathematical explorations in open-ended problem solving situations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 302–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (1997a). Development of fifth-grade children’s problem-posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 183–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (1997b). Development of seventh-grade students’ problem posing. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 241–248). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki and Lahti Research and Training Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. (1987). Cognitive representational systems for mathematical problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 125–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., Kibler, D., Wenger, E., & Truxaw, C. (1989). Exploring the episodic structure of algebra story problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 6(3), 223–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 123–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobato, J., Ellis, A. B., & Munoz, R. (2003). How “focusing phenomena” in the instructional environment afford students’ generalizations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1995). Abduction at the heart of mathematical being. Paper presented in honor of David Tall at the Centre for Mathematics Education of the Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieran, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterise it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2005). Doing qualitative research: Praxis of method. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sáenz-Ludlow, A. (1995). The emergence of the splitting metaphor on a fourth grade classroom. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the American Chapter for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 152–157). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sáenz-Ludlow, A. (2004). Metaphor and numerical diagrams in the arithmetical activity of a fourth-grade class. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 34–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). Reflections on doing and teaching mathematics. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 53–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., & Mamona, J. (1989). Problem posing by middle school teachers. In C. A. Maher, G. A. Goldin, & R. B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 263–269). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (1996). The QUASAR project: The “revolution of the possible” in mathematics instructional reform in urban middle schools. Urban Education, 30, 476–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 179–234). Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor V. Cifarelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cifarelli, V.V., Sevim, V. (2015). Problem Posing as Reformulation and Sense-Making Within Problem Solving. In: Singer, F., F. Ellerton, N., Cai, J. (eds) Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics