Abstract
This chapter examines a type of problem posing that has received little attention in the mathematics education literature. Silver (For the Learning of Mathematics 14:19–28, 1994) defined within-solution problem posing as “problem formulation or reformulation [that] occurs within the process of problem solving” (p. 19). Our analysis documents and explains the role that within-solution problem posing plays during problem solving, focusing on episodes of students from two grade levels: (a) Two fourth-grade students solving a multiplication task, and (b) A mathematics education graduate student solving a number array task. Our research examines: (a) How problem posing evolves from the students’ ongoing interpretations of problematic situations, and (b) How these posed problems contribute to the students’ problem solving. The results provide an explanation of how problem posing and problem solving coevolve in the course of solution activity and thus indicate the beneficial role that problem posing can play in the solution of mathematics problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Italicized comments are used to indicate the actions performed by the students as observed by the researchers.
- 2.
We use a bracket notation that lists the top-to-bottom rows of the block being considered. For example, the 2 × 2 block is indicated by [1, 2: 2, 4], the 3 × 3 block is indicated by [1, 2, 3: 2, 4, 6: 3, 6, 9].
References
Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (1993). The art of problem posing (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.
Cai, J. (1994). A protocol-analytic study of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 6(2), 166–183.
Cai, J. (1998). An investigation of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem posing and problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10, 37–50.
Cai, J., Moyer, J., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2012). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 57–69. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9429-3. Online First.
Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., & McLaughlin, C. (1998). Algorithms in solving non-routine problems. In L. J. Morrow & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), Teaching and learning of algorithms in school mathematics. 1998 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 218–229). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Carlson, M., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45–75.
Cifarelli, V. V., & Cai, J. (2005). The evolution of mathematical explorations in open-ended problem solving situations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 302–324.
Cobb, P., & Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 83–94.
English, L. D. (1997a). Development of fifth-grade children’s problem-posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 183–217.
English, L. D. (1997b). Development of seventh-grade students’ problem posing. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 241–248). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki and Lahti Research and Training Center.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Goldin, G. (1987). Cognitive representational systems for mathematical problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 125–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hall, R., Kibler, D., Wenger, E., & Truxaw, C. (1989). Exploring the episodic structure of algebra story problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 6(3), 223–283.
Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 123–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lobato, J., Ellis, A. B., & Munoz, R. (2003). How “focusing phenomena” in the instructional environment afford students’ generalizations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 1–36.
Mason, J. (1995). Abduction at the heart of mathematical being. Paper presented in honor of David Tall at the Centre for Mathematics Education of the Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieran, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterise it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 165–190.
Roth, W.-M. (2005). Doing qualitative research: Praxis of method. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Sáenz-Ludlow, A. (1995). The emergence of the splitting metaphor on a fourth grade classroom. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the American Chapter for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 152–157). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Sáenz-Ludlow, A. (2004). Metaphor and numerical diagrams in the arithmetical activity of a fourth-grade class. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 34–56.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). Reflections on doing and teaching mathematics. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 53–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93–105.
Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.
Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 521–539.
Silver, E. A., & Mamona, J. (1989). Problem posing by middle school teachers. In C. A. Maher, G. A. Goldin, & R. B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 263–269). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (1996). The QUASAR project: The “revolution of the possible” in mathematics instructional reform in urban middle schools. Urban Education, 30, 476–522.
Thompson, P. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 179–234). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cifarelli, V.V., Sevim, V. (2015). Problem Posing as Reformulation and Sense-Making Within Problem Solving. In: Singer, F., F. Ellerton, N., Cai, J. (eds) Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6257-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6258-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)