Skip to main content

Is Problem Posing a Tool for Identifying and Developing Mathematical Creativity?

  • Chapter
Mathematical Problem Posing

Part of the book series: Research in Mathematics Education ((RME))

Abstract

The mathematical creativity of fourth to sixth graders, high achievers in mathematics, is studied in relation to their problem-posing abilities. The study reveals that in problem-posing situations, mathematically high achievers develop cognitive frames that make them cautious in changing the parameters of their posed problems, even when they make interesting generalizations. These students display a kind of cognitive flexibility that seems mathematically specialized, which emerges from gradual and controlled changes in cognitive framing. More precisely, in a problem-posing context, students’ mathematical creativity manifests itself through a process of abstraction-generalization based on small, incremental changes of parameters, in order to achieve synthesis and simplification. This approach results from a tension between the students’ tendency to maintain a built-in cognitive frame, and the possibility to overcome it, which is constrained by their need to devise mathematical problems that are coherent and consistent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1993). Divergent thinking and creativity: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balka, D. S. (1974). The development of an instrument to measure creative ability in mathematics. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36(01), 98. (UMI No. AAT 7515965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (1983/1990). The art of problem posing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., & Cifarelli, V. (2005). Exploring mathematical exploration: How two college students formulated and solved their own mathematical problems. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 27(3), 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity, flow, and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: A study with artists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(1), 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deák, G. O. (2004). The development of cognitive flexibility and language abilities. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 31, 271–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetriou, A., Kui, Z. X., Spanoudis, G., Christou, C., Kyriakides, L., & Platsidou, M. (2005). The architecture, dynamics, and development of mental processing: Greek, Chinese, or Universal? Intelligence, 33(2), 109–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. T. (1982). Problem finding and solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, G. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1996). On different facets of mathematical thinking. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 253–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., Furr, N. R., & Bingham, C. B. (2010). Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, D. L. (1998). Children’s problem posing within formal and informal contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 42–53). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003/2004). Working group on basic skills, progress reports 2003, 2004, European Commission interim working document for the objectives 1.2 (developing the skills for the knowledge society), 3.2 (developing the spirit of enterprise), and 3.3 (Improving foreign language learning) Annex 2 Domains of Key Competences—Definitions, Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes. Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/policies/2010/objectives_en.html#basic

  • European Commission. (2005). Proposal for a recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning, Council of The European Union, 11 November 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. W. (1964). Measuring the ability of students to respond in creative mathematical situations at the late elementary and early junior high school level. Dissertation Abstracts, 25(12), 7107. (UMI No. AAT 6505302).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasko, D. (2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiman, V., & Sriraman, B. (2007). Does mathematics gifted education need a working philosophy of creativity? Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6(1–2), 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furr, N. R. (2009). Cognitive flexibility: The adaptive reality of concrete organization change (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Retrieved May 12, 2011, from http://gradworks.umi.com/3382938.pdf

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity as seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Ghandi. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2006). Five minds for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, M. (2001). Good work: When excellence meets ethics. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W. (1975). Problem-finding and the inventiveness of solutions. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9(1), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W. (1979). Problem finding: A theoretical note. Cognitive Science, 3(2), 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P. (1996). Toby’s math. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 175–282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goncalo, J. A., Vincent, L., & Audia, P. G. (2010). Early creativity as a constraint on future achievement. In D. Cropley, J. Kaufman, A. Cropley, & M. Runco (Eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 114–133). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. (1945/1954). Psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haylock, D. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in school children. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29(3), 68–74. Retrieved March 10, 2003, from http://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/fix/publications/zdm/adm97

  • Huang, R., & Leung, K. S. F. (2004). Cracking the paradox of Chinese learners: Looking into the mathematics classrooms in Hong Kong and Shanghai. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 348–381). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, E. S., & Perkins, D. N. (1997). Problem finding: The search for mechanism. In M. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (pp. 257–293). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L. R. (1973). The relationships among mathematical creativity, numerical aptitude and mathematical achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34(05), 2168. (UMI No. AAT 7326021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krems, J. F. (1995). Cognitive flexibility and complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 201–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In J.-H. Woo, H.-C. Lew, K.-S. Park, & D.-Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). Seoul, South Korea: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, S. S. (1997). On the role of creative thinking in problem posing. Zentralbatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik (ZDM), 97(2), 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, S. S., & Silver, E. A. (1997). The role of task format, mathematics knowledge, and creative thinking on the arithmetic problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. S. (2007). Characteristics of mathematics teaching in Shanghai, China: Through the lens of a Malaysian. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T. (2002). Young children posing problems: The influence of teacher intervention on the type of problems children pose. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(2), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T., & Guignard, J. (2004). The generality-specificity of creativity: A multivariate approach. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 43–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • NAEP Mathematics Framework for the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2012). Retrieved October 2012, from http://www.nagb.org/publications/frameworks.html

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards of school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1097–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelczer, I., Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2013a). Cognitive framing: A case in problem posing. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelczer, I., Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2013b). Teaching highly able students in a common class: Challenges and limits. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 8 (pp. 1235–1244). Antalya, Turkey: ERME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1913). The foundations of science. New York, NY: The Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1948). Science and method. New York, NY: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prouse, H. L. (1967). Creativity in school mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 60, 876–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. A. (1962). Cognitive complexity and cognitive flexibility. Sociometry, 25, 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity though instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29, 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., & Marshall, S. P. (1989). Mathematical and scientific problem solving: Findings, issues and instructional implications. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 265–290). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F. M. (2006). A cognitive model for developing a competence-based curriculum in secondary education. In A. Crisan (Ed.), Current and future challenges in curriculum development: Policies, practices and networking for change (pp. 121–141). Bucharest, Romania: Humanitas Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F. M. (2007). Balancing globalisation and local identity in the reform of education in Romania. In B. Atweh, M. Borba, A. Barton, D. Clark, N. Gough, C. Keitel, C. Vistro-Yu, & R. Vithal (Eds.), Internalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 365–382). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F. M. (2012). Exploring mathematical thinking and mathematical creativity through problem posing. In R. Leikin, B. Koichu, & A. Berman (Eds.), Exploring and advancing mathematical abilities in high achievers (pp. 119–124). Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N. F., Cai, J., & Leung, E. (2011). Problem posing in mathematics learning and teaching: A research agenda. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 137–166). Ankara, Turkey: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F. M., Pelczer, I., & Voica, C. (2011). Problem posing and modification as a criterion of mathematical creativity. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the CERME 7 (pp. 1133–1142). Rzeszów, Poland: University of Rzeszów.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F. M., & Sarivan, L. (Eds.). (2006). QUO VADIS ACADEMIA? Reference points for a comprehensive reform of higher education (In Romanian, with a synthesis in English). Bucharest, Romania: Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2011) Creative contexts as ways to strengthen mathematics learning. In M. Anitei, M. Chraif, & C. Vasile (Eds.), Proceedings PSIWORLD 2011. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 33, pp. 538–542). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.179

  • Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2013). A problem-solving conceptual framework and its implications in designing problem-posing tasks. ESM, 83(1), 9–26. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9422-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. (1988). Teaching-learning strategies and mathematical creativity. Delhi, India: Mittal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smilansky, J. (1984). Problem solving and the quality of invention: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 57–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2009). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The International Journal on Mathematics Education [ZDM], 41, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). Creating creative minds. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 608–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Steinberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Melbourne, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms, technical manual. Lexington, MA: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voica, C., & Singer, F. M. (2012). Problem modification as an indicator of deep understanding. Paper presented to Topic Study Group 3 “Activities and Programs for Gifted Students,” at the 12th International Congress for Mathematics Education (ICME-12). ICME-12 Pre-proceedings (pp. 1533–1542). Retrieved from http://icme12.org/upload/UpFile2/TSG/1259.pdf

  • Voica, C., & Singer, F. M. (2013). Problem modification as a tool for detecting cognitive flexibility in school children. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 267–279. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0492-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, X., & Sriraman, B. (2011). An exploratory study of relationships between students’ creativity and mathematical problem posing abilities: Comparing Chinese and U.S. students. In B. Sriraman & K. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 5–28). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florence Mihaela Singer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Problem 1 (posed by Diana, grade 4): On the planet Zingo live several types of aliens: with two or three eyes, with two or three ears, and with five or six hands. They are green or red. How many aliens should shake hands with Mimo to be sure that he shook hands with at least two of the same type?

Problem 2 (posed by Emilia, grade 4): In the Infinite king’s castle there are 43 corridors with 18 rooms each. Each room has 52 windows. At every window, there are three princesses. How many princesses are in the Infinite king’s castle?

Problem 3 (posed by Malina, grade 4): In Princess Rose’s jewelry boxes there are sapphires, emeralds, and rubies. 27 are not rubies, 31 are not emeralds, and 32 are not sapphires. In total, there are 45 jewels. How many jewels of each kind does Princess Rose have?

Problem 4 (posed by Paul, grade 4): If a group of students sits by two at their desks, seven students remain standing, and if they are placed by three at the same desks, seven desks remain free. How many students and how many desks are there in the classroom?

Problem 5 (posed by Sabina, grade 4): In the Fairies’ Glade, live 60 unicorns and fairies. They have 160 legs in total. How many beings of each kind are there?

Problem 6 (posed by Sergiu, grade 4): One day, the plane leaves Cluj [a city in Romania] to go to Japan. It departs at sharp hour in the morning, when the hour and the minute hands of a clock form a right angle. The hour hand points to a number bigger than 4. This plane travels at 60 km per hour, and the distance Cluj-Japan is 540 km. In the plane climbed three times more men than women, who are 24,484 people. The cost for a man’s tickets is the first odd number greater than 7. Women’s tickets cost as double of 3 added with 4 and the result divided by 2. (A) When did the plane leave Cluj? (B) When did the plane arrive in Japan? (C) How many men boarded the plane? (D) How many women boarded the plane? How much money did the pilot receive, if he received all the money, without 3,000 of total?

Problem 7 (posed by Tudor, grade 4): On a farm, there are two cows, some geese and horses, a total of 86 heads and 328 feet. How many horses are there at the farm?

Problem 8 (posed by Victor, grade 4): In the world of letters, each letter represents a number. M is two times greater than N, and the difference between these two letters is equal to A. A is less than B by seven, and the sum of A and B is neither bigger nor smaller than X. If we add two to X, we get Y. The sum of X and Y equals Z. Knowing that Z − (A: O + P: P + Q: Q + A: R) = 30, find M × N.

Problem 9 (posed by Alin, grade 5): (A poem!) If one places three cakes in each box/There’ll be three cakes left/If one places five cakes in each box/There’ll be an empty box left. (…) How many boxes and how many cakes/Do I put on the shelves?

Problem 10 (posed by Cosma, grade 5): Two boys need £67 to buy a game. The price of the game decreases by 50%. If the first boy pays three times more than the second does, how much money should each pay?

Problem 11 (posed by Andrei, grade 6): On the planet Uranus in the T316B2 city, there are less than 101 and more than 49 aliens. 1/2 of them are red, 2/7 are green, 1/14 are yellow, and the rest are blue. How many aliens live in E943S4 city, the capital of the planet, if their number is 149 times greater than the count of blue aliens from T316B2?

Problem 12 (posed by Cosmin, grade 6): P⋅R⋅I⋅C⋅E⋅P⋅I⋅P⋅R⋅O⋅B⋅L⋅E⋅M⋅A = x. Knowing that different letters represent different digits, find the last digit of the number x. (He multiplies the letters meaning YOU UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM.)

Problem 13 (posed by Cristiana, grade 6): Maria has to solve the following problem: “4, 14, 1114, 3114, 132114, 1113122114, … What is the next term of the sequence?” The mathematics teacher gave her some advice: “You must empty your mind of all other mathematical information.” Can you help Maria to solve the problem?

Problem 14 (posed by Cristiana, grade 6): Maya the puppy has six bones. She wants to make four equilateral triangles out of these six bones, but she forgot one essential rule: one has to think out of the box. Can you help her?

Problem 15 (posed by Maria, grade 6): A number is “special” if it can be written as both a sum of two consecutive integers and a sum of three consecutive integers. Prove that: (a) 2,001 is special, and 3,001 is not special, (b) the product of two special numbers is special, (c) if the product of two numbers is special, then at least one of them is special.

Problem 16 (posed by Mihai, grade 6): Because the sixth-grade students were the best, they received a prize consisting in 1 h free on paintball field. The field has the dimensions 80 m × 120 m, and two people are able (and allowed) to shoot one another if they are at no more than 29 m distance. Prove that howsoever 26 students place themselves on the ground, at least 3 get shot.

Problem 17 (posed by Nandor, grade 6): Dan has a 24 hour display digital clock that is broken: the first digit of the hours’ counter and the last digit of the minutes’ one get switched every 5 hours. Example: if switch occurs at 17:42, the clock will show 24:71. The clock continues to run correctly after that and stops at 99:99, when it gives an error (1 hour is transformed in 100 minutes). If the clock breaks when the correct time of the day is 10:10, what will be the time before giving the error?

Problem 18 (posed by Radu, grade 6): Prove that any parallelogram can be divided into 16,384 congruent parallelograms.

Problem 19 (posed by Teofil, grade 6): In 2011, 300 students went on the field trip. Knowing that the percentage of girls was 45%, find the number of boys who participated.

Problem 20 (posed by Vlad, grade 6): A new quarter was built near a forest. The residents put their garbage in waste containers with a capacity of 750 kg each. At every 10 kg of garbage throw away by the residents, 4 kg disappear, being consumed by bears leaving in the forest. The residents produce 20 kg of garbage per hour. (a) Find out how long it take to fill a waste container; (b) Knowing that in the neighborhood live 500 families that fill 86 containers per month, that each family should pay 7.8 euros garbage fee, but only 400 families are fair and pay, calculate how much money is collected as garbage fees in a month.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singer, F.M., Voica, C. (2015). Is Problem Posing a Tool for Identifying and Developing Mathematical Creativity?. In: Singer, F., F. Ellerton, N., Cai, J. (eds) Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics