Skip to main content

What Do High School Teachers Mean by Saying “I Pose My Own Problems”?

  • Chapter
Mathematical Problem Posing

Part of the book series: Research in Mathematics Education ((RME))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter was to identify mathematics teachers’ conceptions of the notion of “problem posing.” The data were collected from a web-based survey, from about 150 high school mathematics teachers, followed by eight semi-structured interviews. An unexpected finding shows that more than 50% of the teachers see themselves as problem posers for their teaching. This finding is not in line with the literature, which gives the impression that not many mathematics teachers are active problem posers. In addition, we identified four types of teachers’ conceptions for “problem posing.” We found that the teachers tended to explain what problem posing meant to them in ways that would embrace their own practices. Our findings imply that most of the mathematics teachers are result-oriented—as opposed to being process-oriented—when they talk about problem posing. Moreover, many teachers who pose problems doubt the ability of their students to do so and consider problem-posing tasks inappropriate for their classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This study is part of a Ph.D. dissertation, in progress, by the first-named author under the supervision of the two other authors. A brief version of this paper was accepted as a research report at PME-37.

  2. 2.

    See http://www.surveymonkey.com.

  3. 3.

    The quotations have been translated from Hebrew by the authors.

References

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—The role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany, NY: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Walters, M. (1983). The art of problem posing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers’ practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 243–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (1997a). The development of fifth-grade children’s problem posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(3), 183–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (1997b). Promoting a problem posing classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(3), 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2003). Engaging students in problem posing in an inquiry-oriented mathematics classroom. In F. Lester & R. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving (pp. 187–198). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 123–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koichu, B., Harel, G., & Manaster, A. (2013). Ways of thinking associated with mathematics teachers’ problem posing in the context of division of fractions. Instructional Science, 41(4), 681–698. Retrieved May 31, 2013, from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11251-012-9254-1#page-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koichu, B., & Kontorovich, I. (2013). Dissecting success stories on mathematical problem posing: A case of the Billiard Task. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontorovich, I., & Koichu, B. (2012). Feeling of innovation in expert problem posing. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(3–4), 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, I., & Bershadsky, I. (2003). Problem posing via “What if not?” strategy in solid geometry—A case study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, I., & Shriki, A. (2007). Problem posing as a means for developing mathematical knowledge of prospective teachers. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 129–136). Seoul, Korea: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Grossman, D. (2013). Teachers modify geometry problems: From proof to investigation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 515–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T. (2004). Designing a framework for problem posing: Young children generating open-ended tasks. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(3), 354–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mestre, P. J. (2002). Probing adults’ conceptual understanding and transfer of learning via problem posing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 9–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, C. C., & Crespo, S. M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 331–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4), Art. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestage, S., & Perks, P. (2007). Developing teacher knowledge using a tool for creating tasks for the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4), 381–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., Mamona-Downs, J., Leung, S. S., & Kenney, P. A. (1996). Posing mathematical problems: An exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2013). A problem-solving conceptual framework and its implications in designing problem-posing tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Melbourne, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • SurveyMonkey (2009). Response rates & surveying techniques—Tips to enhance survey respondent participation. Retrieved May 2, 2010, from http://s3.amazonaws.com/SurveyMonkeyFiles/Response_Rates.pdf

  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Klinshtern .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

AppendixThe Survey

AppendixThe Survey

Selecting Problems to Be Used in Mathematics Teaching

This questionnaire is part of a research done in the Department of Education in Technology and Science at the Technion. The research aims at understanding how mathematics teachers select problems for their teaching. None of the questions has a “right” or “wrong” answer. It is very important that you will answer all the questions of this brief questionnaire.

We would like to thank you for the time you dedicated to answer this questionnaire.

  1. 1.

    The last three years I teach grades:

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

  2. 2.

    Usually I teach class levels

    Strong

    Medium

    Weak

  3. 3.

    Describe all your special teaching project if any ________________________

  4. 4.

    To what extent do you use the following resources for selecting mathematical problems for your teaching?

     

    Almost always

    Often

    Sometimes

    Rarely

    Almost never

    Textbooks

         

    Other books

         

    Internet resources

         

    Professional development workshops

         

    Fellow teachers

         

    My prior academic study

         

    Pose my own problems

         

    Problem posed by students

         

    Others

         

    Point out any other resources that you use ______________________________

  5. 5.

    To what extent do the following situations occur in your teaching?

     

    Almost always

    Often

    Sometimes

    Rarely

    Almost never

    Use my own problems

         

    Activate students in problem posing

         

    Promote class discussion

         

    Encourage group work

         
  6. 6.

    For what purposes do you pose your own problems?

    _______________________________________________________________

  7. 7.

    Seniority in mathematics teaching

    1–2 years

    3–5 years

    6–10 years

    More than 10 years

  8. 8.

    To what extent the following situations are in your responsibility:

     

    Little

    Much

    Planning the school year

      

    Planning the lessons

      

    Execute my planning

      

    Select the mathematical problems to be used

      
  9. 9.

    Education

     

    Math

    Math Ed.

    Science Ed.

    Computer science

    Engineering

    Biology

    Physics

    Others

    B.A./B.Sc.

            

    M.A./M.Sc.

            

    Ph.D.

            

    Other

            
  10. 10.

    Personal details (optional)

    • Name: ________________

    • Email: ________________

    • Phone: ________________

  11. 11.

    I am interested in receiving updates about the results of the study

    Yes

    No

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klinshtern, M., Koichu, B., Berman, A. (2015). What Do High School Teachers Mean by Saying “I Pose My Own Problems”?. In: Singer, F., F. Ellerton, N., Cai, J. (eds) Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics