Abstract
The aim of this chapter was to identify mathematics teachers’ conceptions of the notion of “problem posing.” The data were collected from a web-based survey, from about 150 high school mathematics teachers, followed by eight semi-structured interviews. An unexpected finding shows that more than 50% of the teachers see themselves as problem posers for their teaching. This finding is not in line with the literature, which gives the impression that not many mathematics teachers are active problem posers. In addition, we identified four types of teachers’ conceptions for “problem posing.” We found that the teachers tended to explain what problem posing meant to them in ways that would embrace their own practices. Our findings imply that most of the mathematics teachers are result-oriented—as opposed to being process-oriented—when they talk about problem posing. Moreover, many teachers who pose problems doubt the ability of their students to do so and consider problem-posing tasks inappropriate for their classrooms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This study is part of a Ph.D. dissertation, in progress, by the first-named author under the supervision of the two other authors. A brief version of this paper was accepted as a research report at PME-37.
- 2.
- 3.
The quotations have been translated from Hebrew by the authors.
References
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—The role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8, 14.
Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401–423.
Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany, NY: SUNY.
Brown, S., & Walters, M. (1983). The art of problem posing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821–836.
Crespo, S. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers’ practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 243–270.
English, L. D. (1997a). The development of fifth-grade children’s problem posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(3), 183–217.
English, L. D. (1997b). Promoting a problem posing classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(3), 172–179.
English, L. D. (2003). Engaging students in problem posing in an inquiry-oriented mathematics classroom. In F. Lester & R. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving (pp. 187–198). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 123–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Koichu, B., Harel, G., & Manaster, A. (2013). Ways of thinking associated with mathematics teachers’ problem posing in the context of division of fractions. Instructional Science, 41(4), 681–698. Retrieved May 31, 2013, from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11251-012-9254-1#page-1.
Koichu, B., & Kontorovich, I. (2013). Dissecting success stories on mathematical problem posing: A case of the Billiard Task. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 71–86.
Kontorovich, I., & Koichu, B. (2012). Feeling of innovation in expert problem posing. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(3–4), 199–212.
Lavy, I., & Bershadsky, I. (2003). Problem posing via “What if not?” strategy in solid geometry—A case study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 369–387.
Lavy, I., & Shriki, A. (2007). Problem posing as a means for developing mathematical knowledge of prospective teachers. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 129–136). Seoul, Korea: PME.
Leikin, R., & Grossman, D. (2013). Teachers modify geometry problems: From proof to investigation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 515–531.
Lowrie, T. (2004). Designing a framework for problem posing: Young children generating open-ended tasks. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(3), 354–364.
Mestre, P. J. (2002). Probing adults’ conceptual understanding and transfer of learning via problem posing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 9–50.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Nicol, C. C., & Crespo, S. M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 331–355.
Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4), Art. 11.
Prestage, S., & Perks, P. (2007). Developing teacher knowledge using a tool for creating tasks for the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4), 381–390.
Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75–80.
Silver, E. A., Mamona-Downs, J., Leung, S. S., & Kenney, P. A. (1996). Posing mathematical problems: An exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 293–309.
Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2013). A problem-solving conceptual framework and its implications in designing problem-posing tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 9–26.
Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Melbourne, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
SurveyMonkey (2009). Response rates & surveying techniques—Tips to enhance survey respondent participation. Retrieved May 2, 2010, from http://s3.amazonaws.com/SurveyMonkeyFiles/Response_Rates.pdf
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
AppendixThe Survey
AppendixThe Survey
Selecting Problems to Be Used in Mathematics Teaching
This questionnaire is part of a research done in the Department of Education in Technology and Science at the Technion. The research aims at understanding how mathematics teachers select problems for their teaching. None of the questions has a “right” or “wrong” answer. It is very important that you will answer all the questions of this brief questionnaire.
We would like to thank you for the time you dedicated to answer this questionnaire.
-
1.
The last three years I teach grades:
7
8
9
10
11
12
-
2.
Usually I teach class levels
Strong
Medium
Weak
-
3.
Describe all your special teaching project if any ________________________
-
4.
To what extent do you use the following resources for selecting mathematical problems for your teaching?
Almost always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Almost never
Textbooks
Other books
Internet resources
Professional development workshops
Fellow teachers
My prior academic study
Pose my own problems
Problem posed by students
Others
Point out any other resources that you use ______________________________
-
5.
To what extent do the following situations occur in your teaching?
Almost always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Almost never
Use my own problems
Activate students in problem posing
Promote class discussion
Encourage group work
-
6.
For what purposes do you pose your own problems?
_______________________________________________________________
-
7.
Seniority in mathematics teaching
1–2 years
3–5 years
6–10 years
More than 10 years
-
8.
To what extent the following situations are in your responsibility:
Little
Much
Planning the school year
Planning the lessons
Execute my planning
Select the mathematical problems to be used
-
9.
Education
Math
Math Ed.
Science Ed.
Computer science
Engineering
Biology
Physics
Others
B.A./B.Sc.
M.A./M.Sc.
Ph.D.
Other
-
10.
Personal details (optional)
-
Name: ________________
-
Email: ________________
-
Phone: ________________
-
-
11.
I am interested in receiving updates about the results of the study
Yes
No
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klinshtern, M., Koichu, B., Berman, A. (2015). What Do High School Teachers Mean by Saying “I Pose My Own Problems”?. In: Singer, F., F. Ellerton, N., Cai, J. (eds) Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_22
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6257-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6258-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)