Abstract
In this chapter, we consider how problem posing forms an integral part of mathematical modelling and consider its placement during modelling processes. The problem and its formulation is an essential part of modelling, and a modelling process is usually associated with a continual adjustment and reformulation of the main problem. In addition, one may formulate conjectures, ask monitoring and control questions, and have a critical stance toward the model and its results. We consider how the educational intention of the modelling activity and the placement in the modelling cycle relates to the problems and questions being posed. We briefly consider how problem posing may be implemented in mathematical modelling through the use of students’ conjectures and by students acting as consultants and clients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Another relevant theme, which we do not pursue, is how different goals such as decision making, system analysis and design, and trouble shooting (OECD, 2004) affect the type of problem posing relevant for mathematical modelling.
References
Barbosa, J. C. (2006). Mathematical modelling in classroom: A critical and discursive perspective. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(3), 293–301.
Bonotto, C. (2010). Realistic mathematical modeling and problem posing. In R. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (ICTMA 13) (pp. 399–408). New York, NY: Springer.
Bonotto, C. (2011). Engaging students in mathematical modeling and problem posing activities. Journal of Mathematical Modeling and Application, 1(3), 18–32.
Collingwood, R. G. (1939). An autobiography. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 395–415.
Crouch, R. M., & Haines, C. R. (2004). Mathematical modelling: Transitions between the real world and the mathematical model. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 35(2), 197–206.
English, L. (2010). Young children’s early modeling with data. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22, 24–47.
English, L. D., Fox, J. L., & Watters, J. J. (2005). Problem posing and solving with mathematical modeling. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 156–163.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed.) (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London, United Kingdom: Continuum Press. (Originally published 1960)
Galbraith, P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(2), 143–162.
Goldstein, R., & Pratt, D. (2001). Michael’s computer game: A case of open modelling. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (Vol. 3, pp. 49–56). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
Hana, G. M. (2012). Undersøkende virksomhet, koordinering og spørsmålets forrang [Inquiry, negotiation and the priority of the question]. In M. Johnsen-Høines & H. Alrø (Eds.), Læringssamtalen i matematikkfagets praksis—Bok I (pp. 65–88). Bergen, Norway: Caspar Forlag.
Hana, G. M., Hansen, R., Johnsen-Høines, M., Lilland, I. E., & Rangnes, T. E. (2011). Learning conversation in mathematics practice—school-industry partnerships as an arena for teacher education. In Conference Proceedings Educational Interfaces Between Mathematics and Industry (pp. 281–290). Lisbon, Portugal: ICMI/ICIAM Study, 2010.
Hansen, R., & Hana, G. M. (2012). “But it is not possible to do this until …”—The sequencing of teaching mathematical modeling. In G. H. Gunnarsdottir et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of NORMA 1—The 6th Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 299–308). Reykjavik, Iceland: University of Iceland Press.
Julie, C. (2002). Making relevance in mathematics teacher education. In I. Vakalis, D. Hughes Hallett, D. Quinney, & C. Kourouniotis (Eds.), Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics. New York, NY: Wiley.
Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(3), 302–310.
Lilland, I. E. (2012). Oppdragets betydning for læringssamtalen i matematikkfagets praksis [The importance of the task for the learning conversation in mathematics practice]. In M. Johnsen-Høines & H. Alrø (Eds.), Læringssamtalen i matematikkfagets praksis—Bok I (pp. 125–142). Bergen, Norway: Caspar Forlag.
Maaß, K. (2010). What are modelling competencies? ZDM, 38(2), 113–142. doi:10.1007/BF02655885.
Maaß, K. (2010). Classification scheme for modelling tasks. Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik, 31(2), 285–311. doi:10.1007/s13138-010-0010-2.
Mousoulides, N. G. (2009). Mathematical modeling for elementary and secondary school teachers. In A. Kontakos (Ed.), Research and theories in teacher education. Rhodes, Greece: University of the Aegean.
Mousoulides, N., Sriraman, B., & Christou, C. (2007). From problem solving to modelling: The emergence of models and modelling perspectives. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 23–47.
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development). (2004). Problem solving for tomorrow’s world—First measures of cross curricular competencies from PISA 2003. Paris, France: Program for International Student Assessment.
Ottesen, J. T. (2002). Do not ask what mathematics can do for modelling. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 335–346). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
Swan, M., Turner, R., Yoon, C., & Muller, E. (2007). The roles of modelling in learning mathematics. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 275–284). New York, NY: Springer.
Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskyan perspectives on literacy research (pp. 51–85). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hansen, R., Hana, G.M. (2015). Problem Posing from a Modelling Perspective. In: Singer, F., F. Ellerton, N., Cai, J. (eds) Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6257-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6258-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)