Abstract
Cell-based dynamic equilibrium models are one class of dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) models that can capture equilibrium conditions and realistic traffic dynamics, such as queue spillback, queue formulation, and queue dissipation. However, compared with point-queue DTA models or DTA models using whole-link delay models for flow propagation, cell-based equilibrium models are often more computational demanding. This may raise issues for actual applications, in particular, for the implementation for real-time traffic control and route guidance applications, because the solution must be obtained quickly. Moreover, recent cell-based dynamic equilibrium models tend to capture more realistic travel behavior and traffic dynamics but this made the resulting models even more complicated and more difficult to solve for optimal solutions. Hence, this article aims at reviewing the recent development of cell-based dynamic equilibrium models, the formulation approaches, solution methods used, and the components of these models so as to point out the implementation issues of the latest cell-based dynamic equilibrium model with the consideration supply stochasticity for traffic control and route guidance applications as well as some gaps for future research directions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ban X, Liu HX, Ferris MC, Ran B. A link-node complementarity model and solution algorithm for dynamic user equilibria with exact flow propagations. Transport Res. 2008;42B:823–842.
Bar-Gera H. Origin-based algorithm for the traffic assignment problem. Transport Sci. 2002;36:398–417.
Ben-Akiva M, Cuneo D, Hasan M, Jha M, Yang Q. Evaluation of freeway control using a microscopic simulation laboratory. Transport Res. 2003;11C:29–50.
Carey M. Optimal time-varying flows on congested networks. Oper Res. 1987;35:58–69.
Cascetta E, Nuzzolo A, Russo F, Vitetta A. A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. In: Lesort JB, editor, Transportation and traffic theory. New York: Pergamon; 1996. pp. 697–711.
Chow AHF. Properties of system optimal traffic assignment with departure time choice and its solution method. Transport Res. 2009;43B:325–344.
Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H. Über die partiellen differenzengleichungen der mathematischen physik. Math Ann. 1967;100:32–74.
Daganzo CF. The cell transmission model: a simple dynamic representation of highway traffic. Transport Res. 1994;28B:269–287.
Daganzo CF. The cell transmission model, part ii: network traffic. Transport Res. 1995;29B:79–93.
Daganzo CF. The lagged cell transmission model. In: Ceder A, editor, Transportation and traffic theory. New York: Pergamon-Elservier; 1999. pp. 81–103.
Daganzo CF. On the variational theory of traffic flow: well-posedness, duality and applications. Network Heterogeneous Media. 2006;1:601–619.
Daganzo CF, Laval JA. On the numerical treatment of moving bottlenecks. Transport Res. 2005;39B:31–46.
Daganzo CF, Sheffi Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transport Sci. 1977;11:253–274.
Dial RB. A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transport Res. 1971;5:83–111.
Doan K, Ukkusuri S. On the holding back problem in cell transmission based dynamic traffic assignment models. Transp. Res. Part B. 2012:1218–1238.
Friesz TL, Bernstein DH, Smith TE, Tobin RL, Wie BW. A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network user equilibrium problem. Oper Res. 1993;41:179–191.
Golani H, Waller ST. Combinatorial approach for multi-destination dynamic traffic assignment. J Transport Res Board. 2004;1882:70–78.
Han D, Lo HK. A new alternating direction method for a class of nonlinear variational inequality problems. J Optim Theor Appl. 2002;112:549–560.
Han D, Lo HK. Solving nonadditive traffic assignment problems: a decent method for co-coercive variational inequalities. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;159:529–544.
Han L, Ukkusuri S, Doan K. Complementarity formulations for the cell transmission model based dynamic user equilibrium with departure time choice, elastic demand and user heterogeneity. Transp Res B. 2011;45:1749–1767.
Ho J. A successive linear optimization approach to the dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transport Sci. 1980;14:295–305.
Jackson WB, Jucker JV. An empirical study of travel time variability and travel choice behavior. Transport Sci. 1982;16:460–475.
Jayakrishnan R, Tsai WK, Chen A. A dynamic traffic assignment model with traffic flow relationship. Transport Res. 1995;3C:51–82.
Lam WHK, Huang HJ. Dynamic user optimal traffic assignment model for many to one travel demand. Transport Res. 1995;29B:243–259.
Leclercq L. Bounded acceleration close to fixed and moving bottlenecks. Transport Res. 2007;41B:309–319.
Li Y, Waller ST, Ziliaskopoulos AK. A decomposition scheme for system optimal dynamic traffic assignment models. Network Spatial Econ. 2003;3:441–455.
Li Y, Ziliaskopoulos AK, Waller ST. Linear programming formulations for system optimum dynamic traffic assignment with arrival time based and departure time based demands. J Transport Res Board. 1999;1667:52–59.
Lighthill MJ, Whitham JB. On kinematic waves. I. Flow movement in long rivers. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded road. Proc R Soc. 1955;A229:281–345.
Lin WH, Wang C. An enhanced 0–1 mixed-integer LP formulation for traffic signal control. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst. 2004;5:238–245.
Liu HX, He XZ, He BS. Method of Successive Weighted Averages (MSWA) and self-regulated averaging schemes for solving stochastic user equilibrium problem. Network Spatial Econ. 2009;9:485–503.
Lo HK, Luo XW, Siu BWY. Degradable transport network: Travel time budget of travelers with heterogeneous risk aversion. Transp Res Part B: Methodol. 2006;40(9):792–806.
Lo HK. A dynamic traffic assignment formulation that encapsulates the cell-transmission model. In: Ceder A, editor. Transportation and traffic theory. Oxford: Elsevier; 1999. pp. 327–350.
Lo HK. A cell-based traffic control formulation: strategies and benefits of dynamic plans. Transport Sci. 2001;35:148–164.
Lo HK, Chen A. Traffic equilibrium problem with route-specific costs: formulation and algorithms. Transport Res. 2000;34B:493–513.
Lo HK, Szeto WY. A cell-based variational inequality formulation of the dynamic user optimal assignment problem. Transport Res. 2002a;36B:421–443.
Lo HK, Szeto WY. A cell-based dynamic traffic assignment model: formulation and properties. Math Comput Model. 2002b;35:849–865.
Lo HK, Szeto WY. Modeling advanced traveler information services: static versus dynamic paradigms. Transport Res. 2004;38B:495–515.
Mahmassani HS, Liu YH. Models of user pre-trip and en-route switching decisions in response to real-time information. Transportation systems 1997. (TS’97). Proceedings volume from the 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS Symposium. 1997;3:1363–1368.
Munoz L, Sun X, Horowitz R, Alvarez L. Traffic density estimation with the cell transmission model, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, Colorado, June, 2003. 3750–3755.
Nagurney A. Network economics: a variational inequality approach. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic; 1993.
Ngoduy D. Multiclass first order model using stochastic fundamental diagrams. Transportmetrica. 2011;7:111–125.
Nie Y. A cell-based merchant–nemhauser model for the system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transp Res B. 2011;45:329–342.
Nie Y, Zhang HM. Solving the dynamic user optimal assignment problem considering queue spillback. Network Spatial Econ. 2010;10:49–71.
Pan T, Sumalee A, Zhong R, Uno N. The stochastic cell transmission model considering spatial and temporal correlations for traffic states prediction. Proceedings of the third international symposium on dynamic traffic assignment 2010.
Pavlis Y, Recker W. A mathematical logic approach for the transformation of the linear conditional piecewise functions of dispersion-and-store and cell transmission traffic flow models into linear mixed-integer form. Transport Sci. 2009;43:98–116.
Peeta S, Ziliaskopoulos AK. Foundations of dynamic traffic assignment: the past, the present and the future. Network Spatial Econ. 2001;1:233–265.
Ramadurai G, Ukkusuri SV. Dynamic user equilibrium model for combined activity-travel choices using activity-travel supernetwork representation. Network Spatial Econ. 2010;10:273–292.
Ramadurai G. Novel dynamic user equilibrium models: analytical formulations, multi-dimensional choice, and an efficient algorithm. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of civil and environmental engineering. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; 2009.
Ramadurai G, Ukkusuri SV, Zhao S, Pang JS. Linear complementarity formulation for single bottleneck model with heterogeneous commuters. Transp Res B. 2010;44:193–214.
Ran B, Boyce D. Modeling dynamic transportation networks. An intelligent transportation system oriented approach, 2nd revised edn. Heidelberg: Springer; 1996.
Ran B, Lee DH, Shin MSI. Dynamic traffic assignment with rolling horizon implementation. J Transport Eng. 2002;128:314–322.
Richards PI. Shockwaves on the highway. Oper Res. 1956;4:42–51.
Shao H, Lam WHK, Tam ML. A reliability-based stochastic traffic assignment model for network with multiple user classes under uncertainty in demand. Network Spatial Econ. 2006;6:173–204.
Sharma S, Mathew TV, Ukkusuri SV. Approximation techniques for transportation network design problem under demand uncertainty. J Comput Civ Eng. 2011;25:316–329.
Shen W, Nie YM, Zhang H. Dynamic network simplex method for designing emergency evacuation plans. Transport Res Rec. 2007;2022:83–93.
Simon H. A behavioural model of rational choice. Q J Econ. 1955;69:99–118.
Small KA. The scheduling of consumer activities: work trips. Am Econ Rev. 1982;72:467–479.
Sumalee A, Zhong RX, Pan TL, Szeto WY. Stochastic cell transmission model (SCTM): A stochastic dynamic traffic model for traffic state surveillance and assignment. Trans Res B. 2011;45:507–533.
Sumalee A, Zhong RX, Pan TL, Iryo T, Lam WHK. Stochastic cell transmission model for traffic network with demand and supply uncertainties. Transport Res B. 2010;45:507–533.
Sumalee A, Zhong R, Szeto WY, Pan T. Stochastic cell transmission model under demand and supply uncertainties. Proceedings of the second international symposium on dynamic traffic assignment 2008.
Szeto WY. The enhanced lagged cell-transmission model for dynamic traffic assignment. Transport Res Rec. 2008;2085:76–85.
Szeto WY, Lo HK. A cell-based simultaneous route and departure time choice model with elastic demand. Transport Res. 2004;38B:593–612.
Szeto WY, Lo HK. The impact of advanced traveler information services on travel time and schedule delay costs. J Intell Transport Syst Tech Plan Oper. 2005;9:47–55.
Szeto WY, Lo HK. Dynamic traffic assignment: properties and extensions. Transportmetrica. 2006;2:31–52.
Szeto WY, Sumalee A. Multi-class reliability-based stochastic-dynamic-user-equilibrium assignment problem with random traffic states. Proceedings of the 88th annual meeting of transportation research board. 2009.
Szeto WY, Ghosh B, Basu B, O’Mahony M. Cell-based short-term traffic flow forecasting using time series modelling. ASCE J Transport Eng. 2009;135:658–667.
Szeto WY, Sumalee A, Jiang Y. A cell-based model for multi-class doubly stochastic dynamic traffic assignment. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng. 2011;26:595–611.
Ukkusuri S. Linear programs for user optimal dynamic traffic assignment problem. Master’s thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. 2002.
Ukkusuri S, Han L, Doan K. Dynamic user equilibrium with a path based cell transmission model for general traffic networks. Transp Res B. 2012;46:1657–1684.
Ukkusuri SV, Waller ST. Linear programming models for the user optimal and system optimal network design problem: formulations, comparisons and extensions. Network Spatial Econ. 2008;8:383–406.
Waller ST, Ziliaskopoulos AK. A combinatorial user optimal dynamic traffic assignment algorithm. Ann Oper Res. 2006;144:249–261.
Wardrop J. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proceedings of the institute of civil engineers, Part II. 1952;325–378.
Wie BW, Tobin RL, Friesz TL. The augmented lagrangian method for solving dynamic network traffic assignment models in discrete-time. Transport Sci. 1994;28:204–220.
Wong SC, Wong CK, Tong CO. A parallelized genetic algorithm for calibration of lowry model. Parallel Comput. 2001;27:1523–1536.
Yang H, Meng Q. Departure time, route choice and congestion toll in a queuing network with elastic demand. Transport Res. 1998;32B:247–260.
Zhang L, Yin Y, Lou Y. Robust signal timing for arterials under day-to-day demand variations. Transp Res Record, 2010;2192:156–166.
Zheng H, Chang YC. A network flow algorithm for the cell-based single-destination system optimal dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transport Sci. 2011;45:121–137.
Ziliaskopoulos AK. A linear programming model for the single destination system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transport Sci. 2000;34:37–49.
Ziliaskopoulos AK, Rao L. A simultaneous route and departure time choice equilibrium model on dynamic networks. Int Trans Oper Res. 1999;6:21–37.
Ziliaskopoulos AK, Waller ST, Li Y, Byram M. Large-scale dynamic traffic assignment: implementation issues and computational analysis. J Transport Eng ASCE. 2004;130:585–593.
Acknowledgements
The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (HKU 716312E). The author is grateful for the two reviewers for their constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szeto, W.Y. (2013). Cell-Based Dynamic Equilibrium Models. In: Ukkusuri, S., Ozbay, K. (eds) Advances in Dynamic Network Modeling in Complex Transportation Systems. Complex Networks and Dynamic Systems, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6243-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6243-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6242-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6243-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)