Skip to main content

Core Components of Return-to-Work Interventions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Work Disability

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, a tremendous amount of time and resources have been spent on developing evidence-based interventions to facilitate return-to-work and prevent work disability. However, an important challenge in implementing these interventions resides in the fact that replicating them requires identifying their effective components. This chapter addresses this particular issue by first introducing the reader to methods and concepts used in the identification of core components of evidence-based interventions. Then, it presents a summary of the latest evidence on core components of intervention to facilitate work resumption for workers affected by two common health problems: musculoskeletal disorders and mental illnesses. Finally, it presents the specific research gaps that should be addressed to facilitate dissemination and implementation of evidence-based return-to-work interventions in a broader effort to reduce the burden of work disability worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ammendolia, C., Cassidy, D., Steenstra, I., Soklaridis, S., Boyle, E., Eng, S., et al. (2009). Designing a workplace return-to-work program for occupational low back pain: An intervention mapping approach. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 10, 65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., Parcel, G., Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N. (2001). Intervention Mapping: Developing theory and evidence-based health education programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultmann, U., Sherson, D., Olsen, J., Hansen, C. L., Lund, T., & Kilsgaard, J. (2009). Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(1), 81–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. R., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, M. J., Vachon, B., Loisel, P., & Berthelette, D. (2003). Constructing the program impact theory for evidence-based work rehabilitation program for workers with low back pain. Work, 21, 233–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eke, A. N., Neumann, M. S., Wilkes, A. L., & Jones, P. L. (2006). Preparing effective behavioral interventions to be used by prevention providers: The role of researchers during HIV prevention research trials. AIDS Education and Prevention, 18, 44–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fassier, J. B., Durand, M. J., & Loisel, P. (2011). Implementing return-to-work interventions for workers with low-back pain—A conceptual framework to identify barriers and facilitators. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 37(2), 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network. FMHI Publication #231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. S., Herbst, J. H., Whittier, D. K., Jones, P. L., Smith, B. D., Uhl, G., et al. (2011). Taxonomy for strengthening the identification of core elements for evidence-based behavioral interventions for HIV/AIDS prevention. Health Education Research, 26(5), 872–885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2004). How to spread good ideas: A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation. London, UK: Report for the NCCSDO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T., Roberts, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2005). Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 61(2), 427–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Q. N. (2010). Activities used to implement work disability prevention program: A scoping review. Report presented to the Department of Health Administration, University of Montreal in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the International Master’s Program In Health Technology assessment and Management (the ULYSSES Program).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: A conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care, 7(3), 149–158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambeek, L. C., van Mechelen, W., Knol, D. L., Loisel, P., & Anema, J. R. (2010). Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. British Medical Journal, 340, c1035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Altschul, I., & Mowbray, C. (2008). Using planned adaptation to implement evidence-based programs with new populations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 290–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loisel, P., Buchbinder, R., Hazard, R., Keller, R., Scheel, I., van Tulder, M., et al. (2005). Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: The challenge of implementing evidence. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 507–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachen, E., Clarke, J., Franche, R. L., & Irvin, E. (2006). Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return-to-work after injury. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32(4), 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKleroy, V. S., Galbraith, J., Cummings, B., Jones, P., Harshbarger, C., Collins, C., et al. (2006). Adapting evidence based behavioral interventions for new settings and target populations. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomaki, G., Franche, R. L., Khushrushahi, N., Murray, E., Lampinen, T., & Mah, P. (2010). Best Practices for Return-to-work/Stay-at-work Interventions for Workers with Mental Health Conditions. Vancouver, BC: Occupational Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare in BC (OHSAH). Final report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popay, J. (Ed.). (2006). Moving beyond effectiveness in evidence synthesis: Methodological issues in the synthesis of diverse sources of evidence. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W., Hong, Q. N., Pransky, G., & Loisel, P. (2008). A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18(1), 2–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Community Toolbox by the Work Group for Community Health and Development at the University of Kansas. Retrieved April 2, 2012, from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/default.aspx

  • Tjulin, A., Stiwne, E. E., & Ekberg, K. (2009). Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19, 409–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Oostrom, S. H., Anema, J. R., Terluin, B., Venema, A., de Vet, H. C., & van Mechelen, W. (2007). Development of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with stress-related mental disorders: Intervention Mapping as a useful tool. BMC Health Services Research, 7, 127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, S. J., Anema, J. R., Schellart, A. J., van Mechelen, W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2009). Intervention mapping for development of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Public Health, 9, 216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, G., Burton, K., & Kendall, N. (2009). Vocational rehabilitation: What works, for whom, and when? Literature review report presented by The Vocational Rehabilitation Task Group in association with the Industrial Injuries Advisory Council (IIAC). United Kingdom: TSO Information & publishing solutions.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katia M. Costa-Black Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Costa-Black, K.M. (2013). Core Components of Return-to-Work Interventions. In: Loisel, P., Anema, J. (eds) Handbook of Work Disability. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6214-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6214-9_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6213-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6214-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics