Heritage Tourism in Tranquebar: Colonial Nostalgia or Postcolonial Encounter?

Part of the Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology book series (CGHA, volume 37)


Heritage tourism in a postcolonial context is often discussed as a practice of colonial nostalgia, or even neocolonialism. Yet the case of Tranquebar shows that a postcolonial interest in heritage may also promote dialogue and a more reflected reengagement with colonial history in the postcolonial present. The South Indian town of Tranquebar was a Danish trading colony in 1620–1845. This period plays a major role in the current development of Tranquebar, which has been declared the so-called heritage town to attract tourists. As the well-preserved townscape is being promoted as a material expression of Indo-Danish colonial history, it is increasingly drawn into question what this history means in a Danish as well as in an Indian perspective. This causes negotiations of the colonial history at several levels. In the encounter with the town and its residents, tourists have occasion to reflect on the meanings and the nature of the Danish colonial engagements with India and other parts of the world. Equally, Danish and Indian agents in the development of Tranquebar as a heritage town enter into a dialogue not only on the colonial past and its meanings, but also on the postcolonial present. Although the relations between India and the various European colonial powers of the past are far from uncontroversial, in the case of Tranquebar a mutual narrative strategy on the colonial Indo-Danish past is that of anti-conquest, a history which makes a mutual reengagement possible.


Colonial Period Colonial Power Colonial History Colonial Past Heritage Tourism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This chapter is based on my PhD project, which I carried out from March 2007 to February 2010 (Jørgensen 2010). I thank the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation for my scholarship and the National Museum of Denmark and the Farumgaard Foundation for funding my fieldwork.


  1. Arasatnam, S. (1986). Merchants, companies and commerce on the Coromandel Coast 1650–1740. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Billig, M. (2008). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Boym, S. (2001). The future of nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bredsdorff, A. (2009). The trials and travels of Willem Leyel: An account of the Danish East India Company in Tranquebar, 1639–48. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar
  5. Britton, G. S. (1982). The political economy of tourism in the third world. Annals of Tourism Research, 9, 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brøndsted, J. (Ed.) (1952–53). Vore gamle tropekolonier (Vols. 1–2). København: Westermanns Forlag.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, M. E., & Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2005). Maasai on the lawn: Tourism realism in East Africa. In R. Bruner (Ed.), Culture on tour. Ethnographies of travel (pp. 33–70). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohn, S. B. (1971). India: The social anthropology of a civilization. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Feldbæk, O. (1969). India trade under the Danish flag 1772–1808: European enterprise and Anglo-Indian remittance and trade. Copenhagen: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  10. Feldbæk, O. (1980). Kolonierne i Asien. In K. Glamann & S. Ellehøj (Eds.), Danmarks Historie: Kolonierne i Asien og Afrika (pp. 31–288). København: Politikens Forlag.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, D. (2005). A colonial town for neocolonial tourism. In M. C. Hall & H. Tucker (Eds.), Tourism and postcolonialism: Contested discourses, identities and representations (pp. 126–139). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Folke, S., & Heldgaard, J. (Eds.). (2006). Den rige mus og den fattige elefant: 45 års dansk bistand til Indien. Højbjerg: Hovedland.Google Scholar
  13. Fur, G. (2012). Colonialism and Swedish history—Unthinkable connections? In M. Naum & J. M. Nordin (Eds.), Scandinavian colonialism and the rise of modernity: Small time agents in a global arena. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, B., & Howard, P. (Eds.). (2008). The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, M. C., & Tucker, H. (Eds.). (2005). Tourism and postcolonialism: Contested discourses, identities and representations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hancock, M. E. (2008). The politics of heritage from Madras to Chennai. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hobsbawm, E. (2009). Introduction: Inventing traditions. In E. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ipsen, P., & Fur, G. (2009). Introduction. Itinerario, 33(2), 7–16.Google Scholar
  19. Jørgensen, H. (2009). Whose history? Transnational cultural heritage in Tranquebar. Review of Development and Change, 14(1–2), 227–250.Google Scholar
  20. Jørgensen, H. (2010). Tranquebar: Whose history? Transnational cultural heritage in a former Danish trading colony in South India. PhD Dissertation, Department of History and Area Studies, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  21. Jørgensen, H. (2011). Remoteness and development: Transnational constructions of heritage in a former Danish trading colony in South India. History and Anthropology, 23(2), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jørgensen, H. (forthcoming). Putting Tranquebar on the map: Cultural and material encounters in a process of transnational heritage development. In E. Fihl & A. R. Venkatachalapathy (Eds.), Tranquebar and beyond: Across cultural borders in a South Indian village in past and present. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
  23. Mølgaard, K. (Ed.). (1983a). Indien—Danmark. Forbindelser og samarbejde. København: Den Indiske Ambassade i Danmark.Google Scholar
  24. Mølgaard, K. (1983b). Indisk–dansk handel og økonomisk samarbejde. In K. Mølgaard (Ed.), Indien—Danmark: Forbindelser og Samarbejde (pp. 85–89). København: Den Indiske Ambassade i Danmark.Google Scholar
  25. Nagaswamy, R. (1983). Indisk-danske historiske relationer. In K. Mølgaard (Ed.), Indien–Danmark: Forbindelser og Samarbejde (pp. 5–8). København: Den Indiske Ambassade i Danmark.Google Scholar
  26. Nagaswamy, R. (1987). Tarangampadi. Madras: B. S. Combine.Google Scholar
  27. Nash, D. (1977). Tourism as a form of imperialism. In V. L. Smith (Ed.), Hosts and guests: The anthropology of tourism (pp. 33–47). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  28. Olwig, K. (2003). Narrating deglobalization: Danish perceptions of a lost empire. Global Networks, 3, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pande, S. A. (2007). 150 years on, no place for 1857 British ‘heroes’. The New Indian Express, 25th September 2007,
  30. Pedersen, P. (1987). Tranquebar i dag. In E. Hiort, K. De Fine Licht, & H. Lund (Eds.), Architectura: Arkitekturhistorisk Årsskrift, 9 (pp. 50–73). København: Selskabet for Arkitekturhistorie.Google Scholar
  31. Petersen, P. (1983). Møde med Tranquebar. In K. Mølgaard (Ed.), Indien—Danmark: Forbindelser og Samarbejde (pp. 9–16). København: Den Indiske Ambassade i Danmark.Google Scholar
  32. Pratt, M. L. (2006). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Rao, P. V. Narasimha. (1983). Forord. In K. Mølgaard (Ed.), Indien—Danmark: Forbindelser og Samarbejde (np). København: Den Indiske Ambassade i Danmark.Google Scholar
  34. Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  35. Schaumburg-Müller, H. (2006a). Dansk bistand til Indien. In S. Folke & J. Heldgaard (Eds.), Den rige mus og den fattige elefant—45 års dansk bistand til Indien (pp. 40–77). Viborg: Hovedland.Google Scholar
  36. Schaumburg-Müller, H. (2006b). Indien—fra håbløst tilfælde til stormagt. In S. Folke & J. Heldgaard (Eds.), Den rige mus og den fattige elefant: 45 års dansk bistand til Indien (pp. 11–39). Viborg: Hovedland.Google Scholar
  37. Stecher-Hansen, M. (2008). Thorkild Hansen and the critique of empire. In P. Poddar et al. (Eds.), A historical companion to postcolonial literatures—Continental Europe and its Empires (pp. 74–77). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Thisted, K. (2008). “Hvor Dannebrog engang har vajet i mer end 200 Aar.” Banal nationalisme, narrative skabeloner og postkolonial melankoli i skildringen af de danske tropekolonier. Tranquebar Initiativets Skriftserie, 2, 1–51.Google Scholar
  39. Thisted, K. (2009). ‘Where once Dannebrog waved for more than 200 years’: Banal nationalism, narrative templates and post-colonial melancholia. Review of Development and Change, 14, 147–172.Google Scholar
  40. Tucker, H., & Hall, C. M. (2005). Conclusion. In M. C. Hall & H. Tucker (Eds.), Tourism and postcolonialism: Contested discourses, identities and representations (pp. 184–190). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Culture and SocietyAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations