Abstract
In jail diversion programs, individuals with serious mental illness (and often co-occurring substance use disorders) are diverted away from jails toward community-based treatment and support services instead. Such programs are one of the primary strategies recommended by the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (http://www.bipolarworld.net/pdf/CJ_ADACompliant.pdf). This chapter provides details on a simulation model for projecting the costs and benefits of these more comprehensive and evidence-based services. Two key findings from the simulations produced a net savings for the county: First, people charged with the most serious misdemeanors and low-level felonies must be included for diversion, or there will be no cost savings, as too few jails days are avoided. The simulations also suggest that the most significant cost savings are associated with post-booking jail diversion programs that serve individuals who have more severe clinical diagnoses and more serious criminal charges and who spend more time in the diversion program. Second, the cost burden shifts from the criminal justice system to the community-based service system, which is already strained for resources. However, the cost of community treatment can be shared with the federal government for those divertees enrolled in Medicaid. The Mental Health/Jail Diversion Simulation Model addresses an important public policy consideration: specifically, whether and to what extent jail diversion achieves current and future public-level cost savings. Results of the simulations provide stakeholders responsible for designing jail diversion programs with insight into how eligibility criteria affect the pool of individuals who can be intercepted, as well as the overall fiscal impact of the interception itself.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Consumer refers to person in need of or currently receiving services. This is often referred to as client in other systems, but consumer is used more often and used throughout the chapter.
References
Abram, K. M., & Teplin, L. A. (1991). Co-occurring disorders among mentally ill jail detainees. Implications for public policy. American Psychologist, 46, 1036–1045.
Abram, K. M., Teplin, L. A., & McClelland, G. M. (2003). Comorbidity of severe psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders among women in jail. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1007–1010.
Bala, M. V., & Mauskopf, J. A. (2006). Optimal assignment of treatments to health states using a markov decision model: An introduction to basic concepts. PharmacoEconomics 24 (4):345–354.
Berk, R. A., Bond, J., Lu, R., Turco, R., & Weiss, R. E. (2000). Computer simulations as experiments: Using program evaluation tools to assess the validity of interventions in virtual worlds. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Research design: Donald Campbell’s legacy (pp. 195–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Case, B., Steadman, H. J., Dupuis, S. A., & Morris, L. S. (2009). Who succeeds in jail diversion programs for persons with mental illness? A multi-site study. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 661–674.
Clark, R. E., Ricketts, S. K., & McHugo, G. J. (1999). Legal system involvement and costs for persons in treatment for severe mental illness and substance use disorders. Psychiatric Services, 50, 641–647.
CMHS National GAINS Center. (2007). Practical advice on jail diversion: Ten years of learnings on jail diversion from the CMHS National GAINS Center. New York: Delmar.
Cosden, M., Ellens, J., Schnell, J., & Yamini-Diouf, Y. (2005). Efficacy of a mental health treatment court with Assertive Community Treatment. Behavioral Science and the Law, 23, 199–214.
Cowell, A. J., Broner, N., & Dupont, R. (2004). The cost-effectiveness of criminal justice diversion programs for people with serious mental illness co-occurring with substance abuse. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 292–314.
Frank, R. G., & Glied, S. (2006). Better but not well: mental health policy in the United States since 1950. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hargreaves, W. A. (1986). Theory of psychiatric treatment systems. An approach. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43(7), 701–705.
Heeg, B. M. S., Damen, J., Buskens, E., Caleo, S., De Charro, F., & Van Hout, B. A. (2008). Modelling approaches: The case of schizophrenia. PharmacoEconomics, 26(8), 633–648.
Herinckx, H. A., Swart, S. C., Ama, S. M., Dolezal, C. D., & King, S. (2005). Rearrest and linkage to mental health services among clients of the Clark County Mental Health Court Program. Psychiatric Services, 56, 853–857.
Hiday, V. A., & Ray, B. (2010). Arrests two years after exiting a well-established mental health court. Psychiatric Services, 61, 463–468.
James, G. M., Sugar, C. A., Desai, R., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2006). A comparison of outcomes among patients with schizophrenia in two mental health systems: A health state approach. Schizophrenia Research, 86(1), 309–320.
Korte, A. O. (1990). A first order Markov model for use in the human services. Computers in Human Services, 6(4), 299–312.
Leff, H. S., Dada, M., & Graves, S. C. (1986). An LP planning model for a mental health community support system. Management Science, 32, 139–155.
Leff, H. S., Graves, S., Natkins, J., & Bryan, J. (1985). A system for allocating mental health resources. Administration in Mental Health, 12, 43–68.
Leff, H. S., Hughes, D. R., Chow, C. M., Noyes, S., & Ostrow, L. (2010). A mental health allocation and planning simulation model: A mental health planner’s perspective. In Y. Yih (Ed.), Handbook of healthcare delivery systems. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
Miller, L., Brown, T., Pilon, D., Scheffler, R., & Davis, M. (2009). Measuring recovery from severe mental illness: a pilot study estimating the outcomes possible from California’s 2004 Mental Health Services Act.
Naples, M., & Steadman, H. J. (2003). Can persons with co-occurring disorders and violent charges be successfully diverted? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2(2), 137–143.
Naples, M., Morris, L. S., & Steadman, H. J. (2007). Factors in disproportionate representation among persons recommended by programs and accepted by courts for jail diversion. Psychiatric Services, 58, 1095–1101.
New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, Subcommittee on Criminal Justice. (2004). Background paper. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.bipolarworld.net/pdf/CJ_ADACompliant.pdf
New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America—Final report. Rockville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services. DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3832.
Norton, E. C., Yoon, J., Domino, M. E., & Morrissey, J. P. (2006). Transitions between the public mental health system and jail for persons with severe mental illness: A Markov analysis. Health Economics, 15(7), 719–733.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111–148.
Patten, S. B. (2005). Modelling major depression epidemiology and assessing the impact of antidepressants on population health. International Review of Psychiatry, 17(3), 205–211.
Pennsylvania General Assembly, Legislative Budget and Finance Committee. (2007). Lessons learned from three mental health diversion and post-release programs. Harrisburg, PA: Author.
Perry, J. C., Lavori, P. W., & Hoke, L. (1987). A Markov model for predicting levels of psychiatric service use in borderline and antisocial personality disorders and bipolar type II affective disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 21(3), 215–232.
Pierskalla, W. P., & Brailer, D. J. (1994). Applications of operations research in health care delivery. In S. M. Pollock, M. H. Rothkopf, & A. Barnett (Eds.), Operations research and the public sector (pp. 469–498). New York: North-Holland.
Ridgely, M. S., Engberg, J., Greenberg, M. D., Turner, S., DeMartini, C., & Dembosky, J. W. (2007). Justice, treatment, and cost: An evaluation of the fiscal impact of Allegheny County mental health court. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment.
Shumway, M., Chouljian, T. L., et al. (1994). Patterns of substance use in schizophrenia: A Markov modeling approach. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 28(3), 277–287.
Solnit, A. (2004). The costs and effectiveness of jail diversion: A report to the joint standing committee of the General Assembly. Hartford, CT: Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.
Steadman, H. J., & Naples, M. (2005). Assessing the effectiveness of jail diversion programs for persons with serious mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 163–170.
Steadman, H. J., Osher, F., Robbins, P. C., Case, B., & Samuels, S. (2009). Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services, 60, 761–765.
Sweillam, A., & Tardiff, K. (1978). Prediction of psychiatric inpatient utilization: A Markov chain model. Administration in Mental Health, 6(2), 161–173.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999). Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institute of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, D. (2013). A Simulation Modeling Approach for Planning and Costing Jail Diversion Programs for Persons with Mental Illness. In: Taxman, F., Pattavina, A. (eds) Simulation Strategies to Reduce Recidivism. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6188-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6188-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6187-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6188-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)