Mekong Region Connectivity

  • Alex Smajgl
  • John Ward
Chapter

Abstract

This book provides a cross-sectoral, multi-scale assessment of development-directed investments in the wider Mekong Region. The wider Mekong Region includes Lao PDR, Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar and the Chinese Province of Yunnan, see Fig. 1.1. Evidence highlights a limited set of critical dynamics, including human migration, natural resource flows and increasing levels of private and State financial investments generate a high level of connectivity between these countries (Contreras 2007; Dore 2003; Harima et al. 2003; Theeravit 2003).

Keywords

Migration Manifold Rubber Fishing Malaysia 

References

  1. Bonn2011. 2011. Messages from the Bonn2011 conference: The water, energy and food security nexus – Solutions for a green economy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cechich, A., M. Piattini, A. Vallecillo, C. Atkinson, C. Bunse, and J. Wust. 2003. Driving component-based software development through quality modelling. In Component-based software quality, 207–224. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Contreras, A. 2007. Synthesis: discourse, power and knowledge. In Democratizing water governance in the Mekong Region, ed. L. Lebel, J. Dore, R. Daniel, and Y.S. Koma, 227–236. Chiang Mai: Mekong Press.Google Scholar
  4. De Landa, M. 2006. A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  5. Dore, J. 2003. The governance of increasing Mekong regionalism. In Social challenges for the Mekong Region, ed. M. Kaosa-ard and J. Dore, 405–440. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
  6. Fox, J. M., J. B. Vogler, O. L. Sen, A. L. Ziegler, and T. W. Giambelluca. (2012), ‘Simulating Land-Cover Change in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia’, Environmental Management, 49 (5), 968–79.Google Scholar
  7. Halpern, J. and Pearl, J. (2005), ‘Causes and Explanations: A Structural-Model Approach, Part I: Causes.’, British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 56 (4), 843–87.Google Scholar
  8. Harima, R., R. Varona, and C. DeFalco. 2003. Migration. In Social challenges for the Mekong Region, ed. M. Kaosa-ard and J. Dore, 225–261. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
  9. Harold, A. L., and Murray. Turoff, eds. 2002. The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Electronic version http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/. Accessed 24 Oct 2012.
  10. ICEM. 2010. MRC strategic environmental assessment of hydropower on the Mekong mainstream. Impacts assessment (opportunities and risks) discussion draft. 14 May 2010. Hanoi: International Centre for Environmental Management.Google Scholar
  11. IMHEN. 2010. Impacts of climate change on water resources and adaptation measures. Hanoi: Vietnam Institute of Meteorology, Hydrology and Environment.Google Scholar
  12. IPCC. 2007. Fourth assessment report: Climate change 2007. Cambridge, UK/New York: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  13. Lacombe, G., Smakhtin, V., and Hoanh, C. T. (2012), ‘Wetting tendency in the Central Mekong Basin consistent with climate change-induced atmospheric disturbances already observed in East Asia’, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 1–13.Google Scholar
  14. Lazarus, K. 2009. In search of aluminum: China’s role in the Mekong Region. Cambodia: Heinrich Böll Stiftung Cambodia, World Wild Fund and International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  15. Linstone, H.A., and M. Turoff. 1975. Introduction. In The Delphi method: Techniques and applications, ed. H.A. Linstone and M. Turoff. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. Middleton, C., J. Garcia, and T. Foran. 2009. Old and New hydropower players in the Mekong Region: Agendas and strategies. In Contested waterscapes in the Mekong Region, ed. F. Molle, T. Foran, and M. Käkönen, 23–54. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  17. Molle, F., and P. Floch. 2008. The “desert bloom” syndrome: Irrigation development, politics, and ideology in the northeast of Thailand. Chiang Mai: Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Molle, F., T. Foran, and P. Floch. 2009. Changing waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Historical background and context. In Contested waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance, ed. F. Molle, T. Foran, and M. Käkönen, 1–21. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  19. Mekong River Commission (MRC) (2003). State of the Basin Report. MRC: Phnom Penh.Google Scholar
  20. MRC. 2005a. The MRC basin development plan – scenario for strategic planning, BDP library, vol. 4. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  21. MRC. 2005b. Overview of the hydrology of the Mekong basin. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  22. MRC. 2009. Adaptation to climate change in the countries of the lower Mekong basin. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission (MRC).Google Scholar
  23. Rahmstorf, S. 2007. A semi-empirical approach to projecting future sea-level rise. Science 315: 368–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sawyer, R.K. 2005. Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sen, A. 1995. Rationality and social choice 900. American Economic Review 85: 1–24.Google Scholar
  26. Sen, A. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press/Harvard University. Smajgl, A., T. Foran, J. Dore, J. Ward, and S. Larson. In review. Visions, beliefs and transforma- tion: Methods for understanding cross-scale and trans-boundary dynamics in the wider Mekong Region. Global Environmental Change. Smajgl, A. and Ward, J. (in review), ‘A design protocol for research impact evaluation: Development investments of the Mekong region’, Research Evaluation.Google Scholar
  27. Theeravit, K. 2003. Relationships within and between the Mekong Region in the context of globalisation. In Social challenges for the Mekong Region, ed. M. Kaosa-ard and J. Dore, 49–80. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
  28. Wassmann, R., N.X. Hien, C.T. Hoanh, and T.P. Tuong. 2004. Sea level rise affecting the Vietnamese Mekong delta: Water elevation in the flood season and implications for the rice production. Climate Change 66: 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. White, Peter A. (1998), ‘Causal Judgement: Use of Different Types of Contingency Information as Confirmatory and Disconfirmatory’, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10 (2), 131–70.Google Scholar
  30. WWF. 2008. Livelihood sustainability analysis in Mondulkiri province. Phnom Penh: WWF Greater Mekong-Cambodia Country Program.Google Scholar
  31. Zaleski, Z. (1988), ‘Attributions and emotions related to future goal attainment’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (4), 563–68.Google Scholar
  32. Ziegler, A.D., J.M. Fox, and J. Xu. 2009. The rubber juggernaut. Science 324: 1024–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Smajgl
    • 1
  • John Ward
    • 2
  1. 1.CSIRO Ecosystem SciencesTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Ecosystem SciencesVientianeLao PDR

Personalised recommendations