Skip to main content

Self-Reported Versus Official Offending

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Offending from Childhood to Late Middle Age

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSCRIMINOL))

Abstract

Other than official data, self-report data is the second most utilized source for information on offending. Recognizing the inherent limitations of official and self-report data in terms of sources for crime measurement, this chapter provides an in-depth exploration into the prevalence and frequency of offending among the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development males with a specific focus on the similarities, differences, and overlap across offending estimates from the two crime data sources (official versus self-report). The ratio of self-reported to official offenses is also reviewed and disaggregated by offense type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Piquero, A. R., & Visher, C. A. (2010). Linking the crime and arrest processes to measure variations in individual arrest risk per crime (Q). Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 533–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., & Piquero, A. (2009). New evidence on the monetary value of saving a high-risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., & Jolliffe, D. (2004). England and Wales. In D. P. Farrington, P. A. Langan, & M. Tonry (Eds.), Cross-national studies in crime and justice (pp. 1–38). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available from www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., & Kosterman, R. (2003). Comparing delinquency careers in court records and self-reports. Criminology, 41, 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Loeber, R., & Homish, D. L. (2007). How many offenses are really committed per juvenile court offender? Victims and Offenders, 2, 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D. S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 293–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, J., & Marshall, I. H. (1999). The self-report methodology in crime research. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice (Vol. 25, pp. 291–367). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D., Thornberry, T. P., Gibson, C. L., & Baldwin, J. M. (2010). The development and impact of self-report measures of crime and delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 509–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauritsen, J. (1998). The age-crime debate: Assessing the limits of longitudinal self-report data. Social Forces, 77, 127–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & White, H. R. (2008). Violence and serious theft: Development and prediction from childhood to adulthood. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., Finken, L., & McMorris, B. (2002). Analyzing multiple item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 859–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., MacIntosh, R., & Hickman, M. (2002). The validity of a self-reported delinquency scale. Sociological Methods and Research, 30, 492–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 4, pp. 33–84). Washington, DC: US National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1973). Self-reports of deviant behaviour: Predictive and stable? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1989d). Self-reported and official offending from adolescence to adulthood. In M. W. Klein (Ed.), Cross-National Research in Self-Reported Crime and Delinquency (pp. 399–423). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Barnes, G. C., & Lambert, S. (1996b). The concentration of offending in families. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1, 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farrington, D.P., Piquero, A.R., Jennings, W.G. (2013). Self-Reported Versus Official Offending. In: Offending from Childhood to Late Middle Age. SpringerBriefs in Criminology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6105-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics