Abstract
There is considerable evidence that regional resource endowments promote the viability of firms within those regions. University resources endowments are often portrayed as especially important to the development and success of firms, especially knowledge-based firms that benefit from faculty expertise, specialized facilities, and intellectual property. Recent research, however, suggests that the contribution of university resources endowments to firm performance and viability is contingent on the presence of complementary regional resource endowments. Thus, firms that draw resources from universities are more likely to realize performance benefits when a regional economy is rich in complementary resources. We propose that for knowledge-based startup firms, in addition to the direct positive effects of regional and university resources endowments on firm performance found in prior research, regional resource endowments availability will moderate the impact of university resources endowments on firm performance. We examine these relationships within the population of university-based incubators in the US and a sample of knowledge-based firms associated with those incubators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Acs Z, Audretsch D (1989) Patents as a measure of innovative activity. Kyklos 42:171
Acs Z, Plummer L (2005) Penetrating the “knowledge filter” in regional economies. Ann Reg Sci 39:439–456
Acs Z, Braunerhjelm P, Audretsch D, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32:15–30
Amesse F, Cohendet P (2001) Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy. Res Policy 30:1459–1478
Anderson T, Daim T, Lavoie F (2007) Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation 27:306–318
Astebro T, Bazzazian N (2010). Universities, Entrepreneurship and Local Economic Development. In M. Fritsch (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship and regional development. Northhampton, MA, USA: Edward Edgar
Audretsch D, Feldman M (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86:630–640
Audretsch D, Feldman M (2004) Chapter 61: Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics. Elsevier, New York, pp 2713–2739
Audretsch D, Keilbach M (2004a) Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Reg Stud 38:949–959
Audretsch D, Keilbach M (2004b) Does entrepreneurship capital matter? Entrep Theory Pract 28:419–429
Audretsch D, Lehmann E (2005) Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Res Policy 34:1191–1202
Audretsch D, Stephan P (1999) Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: sources and incentives. J Evol Econ 9:97–107
Audretsch D, Lehmann E, Warning S (2005) University spillovers and new firm location. Res policy 34:1113–1122
Audretsch D, Hülsbeck M, Lehmann E (2010) Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Unternehmensfuhrung und Organisation working paper no. 02-10
Bell M, Albu M (1999) Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Dev 27:1715–1734
Bell M, Pavitt K (1997) Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries. In: Technology, globalisation and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 83–137
Birdsall N (1996) Public spending on higher education in developing countries: too much or too little? Econ Educ Rev 15:407–419
Bozeman B, Crow M (1991) Technology transfer from U.S. government and university R&D laboratories. Technovation 11:231–246
Bramwell A, Wolfe D (2008) Universities and regional economic development: the entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Res Policy 37:1175–1187
DeVol R, Klowden K, Bedroussian A, Yeo B (2009) North America’s High-Tech Economy: The Geography of Knowledge-Based Industries. Milken Institute Research Reports. Retrieved from http://www.milkeninstitute.org/publications/publications.taf?function=detail&ID=38801198&cat=resrep
Dorf R, Worthington K (1990) Technology transfer from universities and research laboratories. Technol Forecast Soc Change 37:251–266
Duncan T, Duncan S, Strycker L (2006) An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
Faulkner W, Senker J, Velho L (1995) Knowledge frontiers: public sector research and industrial innovation in biotechnology, engineering ceramics, and parallel computing. Clarendon, Oxford
Feldman M (2001) The entrepreneurial event revisited: firm formation in a regional context. Ind Corp Change 10:861
Gibbons M, Johnston R (1974) The roles of science in technological innovation. Res Policy 3:220–242
Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J Econ 10:92–116
Griliches Z (1992) The search for R&D spillovers. Scand J Econ 94:29–47
Griliches Z (1994) Productivity, R&D, and the data constraint. Am Econ Rev 84:1–23
Grimaldi R, Kenney M, Siegel DS, Wright M (2011) 30 years after Bayh-Dole: reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Res Policy 40:1045–1057
Gulbranson C, Audretsch D (2008) Proof of concept centers: accelerating the commercialization of university innovation. J Technol Transfer 33:249–258
Harmon B, Ardishvili A, Cardozo R et al (1997) Mapping the university technology transfer process. J Bus Ventur 12:423–434
Hülsbeck M, Lehmann E (2010) The role of regional knowledge production in university technology transfer: isolating coevolutionary effects. Unternehmensfuhrung und Organisation working paper no. 01-10
Joreskog K (1979) Statistical estimation of structural models in longitudinal developmental investigations. In: Nesselroade J, Baltes P (eds) Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development. Academic, New York, pp 303–351
Joreskog K (1981) Statistical models for longitudinal studies. In: Schulsinger F, Mednick S, Knop J (eds) Longitudinal research: methods and uses in behavioral science. Nijhoff Publishing, Hingham, pp 118–124
Joreskog K, Sorbom D (1977) Statistical models and methods for analysis of longitudinal data. In: Aigner D, Goldberger A (eds) Latent variables in socioeconomic models. North-Holland Publishing, New York, pp 285–325
Joreskog K, Sorbom D (1989) LISREL 7: a guide to the program and applications. SPSS Inc., Chicago
Levin R, Klevorick A, Nelson R et al (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Pap Econ Activ 1987:783–831
Leyden D, Link A, Siegel D (2008) A theoretical and empirical analysis of the decision to locate on a university research park. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 55:23–28
Litan R, Cook-Deegan R (2011). Universities and Economic Growth: The Importance of Academic Entrepreneurship. Kauffman, State of Entrepreneurship. Kansas City, MO, USA: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
Markman G, Phan P, Balkin D, Gianiodis P (2005) Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. J Bus Ventur 20:241–263
Marsh H (1993) Stability of individual differences in multiwave panel studies: comparison of simplex models and one factor models. J Educ Meas 30:157–183
Marsh H, Grayson D (1994) Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis: common, time specific, item specific, and residual error components of variance. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 1:116–145
McArdle J, Bell R (2000) An introduction to latent growth models for developmental data analysis. In: Little T, Schnabel K, Baumert J (eds) Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
McCann B, Folta T (2008) Location matters: where we have been and where we might go in agglomeration research. J Manage 34:532–565
Milanov H, Fernhaber S (2009) The impact of early imprinting on the evolution of new venture networks. J Bus Ventur 24:46–61
Nelsen L (2002) Role of university technology transfer operations in assuring access to medicines and vaccines in developing countries. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics 3:301
Peteraf M (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strateg Manage J 14:179–191
Phillips R (2002) Technology business incubators: how effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technol Soc 24:299–316
Porter M (1996) Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. Int Reg Sci Rev 19:85
Porter M (1998) The competitive advantage of nations: with a new introduction. The Free Press, New York
Premus R, Jain R (2005) Technology transfer and regional economic growth issues. Int J Technol Transfer Commer 4:302–317. doi:10.1504/IJTTC.2005.006362
Rosenberg N, Nelson R (1994) American universities and technical advance in industry. Res Policy 23:323–348
Rothaermel F, Agung S, Jiang L (2007) University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Ind Corp Change 16:691–791
Santoro M, Bierly P (2006) Facilitators of knowledge transfer in university-industry collaborations: a knowledge-based perspective. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 53:495–507
Sedaitis J (2000) Technology transfer in transitional economies: a test of market, state and organizational models. Res Policy 29:135–147
Senker J, Faulkner W, Velho L (1998) Science and technology knowledge flows between industrial and academic research: a comparative study. In: Capitalizing knowledge. SUNY Press, New York, pp 111–132
Sivo S (1997) Modeling causal error structures in longitudinal data. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from 58, 04B. (University Microfilms No. AAG9729271)
Sivo S (2001) Multiple indicator stationary time series models. Struct Equ Model 8:599–612
Sivo S, Willson V (1998) Is parsimony always desirable? Identifying the correct model for a longitudinal panel data set. J Exp Educ 66:249–255
Sivo S, Willson V (2000) Modeling causal error structures in longitudinal panel data: a Monte Carlo study. Struct Equ Model 7:174–205
Sivo S, Fan X, Witta L (2005) The biasing effects of unmodeled ARMA time series processes on latent growth curve model estimates. Struct Equ Model 12:215–231
Walls D (2010) National Establishment Time-Series (NETS) Database: 2009 Database Description. Walls & Associates. Retrieved from http://youreconomy.org/pages/walls.lasso
Warren A, Hanke R, Trotzer D (2008) Models for university technology transfer: resolving conflicts between mission and methods and the dependency on geographic location. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 1:219–232
Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manage J 5:171–180
Wright M, Birley S, Mosey S (2004) Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. J Technol Transfer 29:235–246
Wu W (2010) Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese universities. J Technol Transfer 35:203–224
Youtie J, Shapira P (2008) Building an innovation hub: a case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Res Policy 37:1188–1204
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Neal, T., Ford, C., Lasrado, V., Sivo, S. (2012). The Effect of Regional Characteristics on the Relationship Between University Resources and Knowledge-Based Startup’s Performance. In: Audretsch, D., Lehmann, E., Link, A., Starnecker, A. (eds) Technology Transfer in a Global Economy. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 28. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6102-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6102-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6101-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6102-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)