Abstract
Chapters 1 and 2 emphasized technical methods−causal analysis and robust decision-making, respectively – that are especially useful for individual decision-makers. Chapter 3 explored challenges and opportunities for improving decision-making by treating communities, rather than individuals, as the natural units for decision-making. This chapter, by contrast, considers an intermediate level of decision-making entity: the organization, including business enterprises. Although it is a fascinating challenge to understand how businesses (and other organizations) interact with each other and the public within societies, communities, and institutional frameworks, adapting to each other and to their uncertain environments over time (Harford 2011), this chapter has a narrower, applied focus: understanding and improving how organizations describe and respond to the risks and threats that they perceive. It has become common practice for many organizations to explicitly identify, list, and make management priority decisions about different risks that they are aware of facing. These can be as diverse as risks of supply chain disruption, loss of reputation, failure of business continuity, legal liabilities, strikes, plant closures, and market and financial risks. This chapter critically examines how well such explicitly identified risks can be managed by the scoring, rating, and ranking systems now widely used in practice; and whether it is possible to make simple changes to improve the performance of these risk management systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atkinson W (2003) Enterprise risk management at Walmart. Risk Manag. http://www.rmmag.com/Magazine/PrintTemplate.cfm?AID=2209
Bernstein PL (1998) Against the Gods: the remarkable story of risk. Wiley, New York
Cox LA Jr (2008a) What’s wrong with risk matrices? Risk Anal 28(2):497–512
Cox LA Jr (2008b) Some limitations of “Risk = Threat × Vulnerability × Consequence” for risk analysis of terrorist attacks. Risk Anal 28(6):1749–1762
Davies JC (1996) Comparing environmental risks: tools for setting government priorities. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Denardo EV, Rothblum UG, van der Heyden L (2004) Index policies for stochastic search in a forest with an application to R&D project management. Math Oper Res 29(1):162–181
Doctor JN, Bleichrodt H, Miyamoto J, Temkin NR, Dikmen S (2004) A new and more robust test of QALYs. J Health Econ 23(2):353–367
Dyer JS, Jia J (1998) Preference conditions for utility models: a risk-value perspective. Ann Oper Res 80(1):167–182
Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1979) Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper Res 27(4):810–822
EPA SAB (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board) (1990) Reducing risk: setting priorities and strategies for environmental protection. SAB-EC-90-021. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board, Washington, DC [online]. Available http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/28704D9C420FCBC1852573360053C692/$File/REDUCING+RISK++++++++++EC-90-021_90021_5-11-1995_204.pdf. Accessed 14 Sept 12
Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E (2003) Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evol Hum Behav 24:153–172 Gintis H (2000) Game Theory Evolving: A problem-centered introduction to modeling strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Glazebrook KD, Minty R (2009) A generalized gittins index for a class of multiarmed Bandits with general resource requirements. Math Oper Res 34(1):26–44
Harford T (2011) Adapt: why success always starts with failure. Farra, Straus and Giroux, New York
Hazen G, Sounderpandian J (1999) Lottery acquisition versus information acquisition: price and preference reversals. J Risk Uncertainty 18(2):125–136
Hubbard DW (2009) The failure of risk management: why it’s broken and how to fix it. Wiley, New York
Infanger G (2006) Dynamic asset allocation strategies using a stochastic dynamic programming approach. Chapter 5. In: Zenios SA, Ziemba WT (eds) Handbook of assets and liability management, volume 1. North Holland, New York
ISO31000 http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=43170. Accessed 8 July 2011
Jones P, Edmonds Y (2008) Risk-based strategies for allocating resources in a constrained environment. J Homeland Security. www.homelandsecurity.org/newjournal/Articles/displayArticle2.asp?article=171
Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Wiley, New York
MacIntyre CR, Seccull A, Lane JM (2006) Plant A. Development of a risk-priority score for category A bioterrorism agents as an aid for public health policy. Mil Med 171(7):589–594
Martello S, Toth P (1990) Knapsack problems: algorithms and computer interpretations. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY
Mitchell C, Decker C (2004) Applying risk-based decision-making methods and tools to U.S. Navy Antiterrorism Capabilities. J Homeland Security http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ndia/mitchell_rbdm_terr_hls_conf_may04.pdf. Accessed 14 Sept 12
Pfanzagl J (1959) A general theory of measurement. Applications to utility. Naval Research Logistic Quarterly 6:283–294 Rosenthal EC (2011) The Complete idiot’s guide to game theory. The Penguin Group. Alpha Books, New York, New York
Senju S, Toyoda Y (1968) An approach to linear programming with 0–1 variables. Manag Sci 15(5):B-196–B-207
Sethuraman J, Tsitsiklis J (2007) Stochastic search in a forest revisited. Math Oper Res 589–593. http://www.columbia.edu/∼js1353/pubs/search.pdf
Wilson R (1968) The theory of syndicates. Econometrica 336(1):119–132
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Louis Anthony Cox, Jr
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cox, L.A. (2012). Improving Organizational Risk Management. In: Improving Risk Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 185. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6058-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6058-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6057-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6058-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)