Skip to main content

Improving Community Risk Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Improving Risk Analysis

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 185))

  • 2081 Accesses

Abstract

Extreme and catastrophic events are notoriously challenging to learn from, prepare for, and protect against. They are rare and unfamiliar – the bigger the loss, the less frequent and familiar catastrophes of that magnitude tend to be. This makes them hard to envision and plan for adequately in our daily lives. They are often inherently unpredictable, in that past data does not enable credible early warnings of the approximate time, place, or magnitude of the next occurrence. This unpredictability arises even under ideal conditions, with unrestricted access to all past data and computational power and modeling expertise to analyze it, largely because causes cannot always be discerned in advance. Seemingly trivial events sometimes precipitate large consequences, such as massive avalanches, forest fires, power blackouts, stock market slides, epidemics, or wars, even though they usually do not (Mandelbrot 1964). Several examples are discussed shortly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abaimov SG, Turcotte DL, Shcherbakov R, Rundle JB (2007) Recurrence and interoccurrence behavior of self-organized complex phenomena. Nonlinear Processes Geophys 14:455–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J (2005) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309(5737):1036–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre J, Valejo JC, Sanjuan MAF (2001) Wada basins and chaotic invariant sets in the Hénon-Heiles system. Phys Rev E (Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys) 64(6):066208, ftp://ftp.ma.utexas.edu/pub/mp_arc/c/01/01-452.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1990) The evolution of co-operation. Penguin, London, New York/Basic Books, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K (1988) Self-organized criticality. Phys Rev A 38:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee AV, Duflo E (2011) Poor economics: a radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. PublicAffairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan M (2001) Ubiquity: why Catastrophes happen. Crown/Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Camargo S, Lopes SR, Viana RL (2010) Extreme fractal structures in chaotic mechanical systems: riddled basins of attraction. J Phys Conf Ser 246. http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/246/1/012001/pdf/1742-6596_246_1_012001.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2011

  • Cialdini RB (2001) Influence: science and practice, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox M, Arnold G, Villamayor Tomás S (2010) A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol Soc 15(4):38. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/. Accessed 4 Aug 2011

  • Elster J (2007) Explaining social behavior: more nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans AW, Verlander NQ (1997) What is wrong with criterion FN-lines for judging the tolerability or risk? Risk Anal 17(2):157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Maskin E (1986) The Folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or imperfect information. Econometrica 54(3):533–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2011) The origins of political order: from prehuman times to the French Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadjos T, Weymark JA, Zoli C (2009) Shared destinies and the measurement of risk equity. Ann Oper Res. http://www.arts.cornell.edu/poverty/kanbur/InequalityPapers/Weymark.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2011

  • Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E (2003) Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evol Hum Behav 24:153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim P (1997) The undecidability of the spatialized prisoner’s dilemma. Theor Decis 42(1):53–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guala F (2012) Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Behav Brain Sci 35(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2008) The case for mindless economics. In: Caplin A, Shotter A (eds) The foundations of positive and normative economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimes YY (2009) On the definition of resilience in systems. Risk Anal 29(4):498–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond PJ (1992) Harsanyi’s utilitarian theorem: a simpler proof and some ethical connotations. In: Selten R (ed) Rational interaction: essays in honor of John Harsanyi. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D, Johansson A (2010) Cooperation, norms, and revolutions: a unified game-theoretical approach. PLoS One 5(10):e12530. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J (2006) Cooperation, punishment, and the evolution of human institutions. Science 312(5770):60–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton D, Régner I, Cabantous L, Charalambides L, Vautier S (2011) Do positive illusions predict overconfidence in judgment? A test using interval production and probability evaluation measures of miscalibration. J Behav Decis Making 24(2):117–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard RA (1966) Information value theory. IEEE Trans Syst Sci Cybern SSC-2:22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hylland A, Zeckhauser RJ (1979) The impossibility of bayesian group decision making with separate aggregation of beliefs and values. Econom Econom Soc 47(6):1321–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1(1):11–27, http://josiah.berkeley.edu/2007Fall/NE275/CourseReader/3.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce RD, Raiffa H (1957) Games and decisions. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (1964) Random walks, fire damage amount and other Paretian risk phenomena. Oper Res 12(4):582–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClennen EF (1990) Rationality and dynamic choice: foundational explorations. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michel-Kerjan E, Slovic P (eds) (2010) The irrational economist: making decisions in a dangerous world. PublicAffairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller DC (2003) Public choice III. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC), National Committee on Disaster Research in the Social Sciences: Future Challenges and Opportunities, National Research Council (2006) Facing hazards and disasters: understanding human dimensions. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehring K (2007) The impossibility of a Paretian rational: a Bayesian perspective. Econ Lett 96(1):45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol 41(1–2):127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, May RM (1992) Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 359:826–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman A, Sandholm T (2009) How pervasive is the Myerson-Satterthwaite impossibility? In: Proceedings of the 21st international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI’09, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey P, Okazaki K (2005) Community based disaster management: empowering communities to cope with disaster risks. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN020698.pdf

  • Sae-jie W, Bunwong K, Moore EJ (2010) Qualitative behavior of SIS epidemic model on time scales. Latest trends on applied mathematics, simulation, modelling, pp 159–164. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2010/Corfu/ASM/ASM-25.pdf. ISBN: 978-960-474-210-3

  • Schelling TC (1978) Micromotives and macrobehavior. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheu S-H, Chiu C-H, Hsu T-S (2011) An age replacement policy via the Bayesian method. Int J Syst Sci 42(3):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow AR (2005) Power laws without complexity. Ecol Lett 8(4):361–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suburban Emergency Management System (SEMP) (2006) The catastrophic 1953 North Sea flood of the Netherlands. www.semp.us/publications/biot_reader.php?BiotID=317. Accessed 07 Aug 2011

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein C (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WA Jr (1988) Point process models with applications to safety and reliability. Chapmand & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J (2004) Wada basins and qualitative unpredictability in ecological models: a graphical interpretation. Ecol Model 176:65–74, http://sitemaker.umich.edu/jvander/files/wada_basins.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Louis Anthony Cox, Jr

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cox, L.A. (2012). Improving Community Risk Management. In: Improving Risk Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 185. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6058-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics