Advertisement

Applications

Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

The primary (and perhaps the most difficult) goal of the fusion program has been the production of base-load electricity. Like nuclear fission power plants, fusion power plants are unlikely to lend themselves well to situations that require rapid changes in power levels. This characteristic, as well as economies of scale, tends to make fusion reactors more likely to be economically competitive at relative large sizes in central station (as distinguished from distributed) electricity generation. The latter (distributed) future market most likely will be filled by an array of solar, wind, and possibly gas turbine technologies. The primary competition for fusion will, then, be from coal, nuclear, and possibly natural gas power plants.

Keywords

Hydrogen Production Duty Factor Desalination Plant Fission Reactor Fusion Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 107.
    Chen F.F.: An indispensable truth—how fusion power can save the planet (Springer, 2011)Google Scholar
  2. 108.
    McCarthy, K., et al.: Non-electric applications of fusion. J. Fusion Energ. 21(121) (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 109.
    Freidberg, J.P., Kadak, A.C.: Fusion-fission hybrids revisited. Nat. Phys. 5, 370 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 110.
    Martinez-Vale, J.M., et al.: Hybrid nuclear reactors. Nuclear energy encyclopedia, chapter 38. Wiley, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 111.
    Moses, E.I., et al.: A sustainable nuclear fuel cycle based on laser inertial fusion energy (LIFE). Fusion Sci. Technol. 56, 566 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 112.
    Manheimer, W.: The fusion hybrid as a key to sustainable development. J. Fusion Energ. 23, 223 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 113.
    Bethe, H.A.: Nuclear News 21, 41 (1978)Google Scholar
  8. 114.
    Bethe, H.A.: The fusion hybrid. Physics Today 32, 44 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 115.
    Jameson, R.A.: Accelerator-driven transmutation of nuclear waste and electric power production. J. Fusion Energ. 12, 379 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 116.
    Martin Peng, Y.-K., Cheng, E.T.: Magnetic fusion driven transmutation of waste (FTW). J. Fusion Energ. 12, 381 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 117.
    Salvatores, M.: Physics features comparison of TRU burners; fusion/fission hybrids. accelerator-driven systems and low conversion ration fast reactors. Ann. Nucl. Energ. 36, 1653 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 118.
    Gough W.C., Eastlund B.J.: The fusion torch: closing the cycle from use to reuse. USAEC Report WASH-1132 (May 15, 1969); also Energy, wastes and the fusion torch. Unnumbered USAEC report (April 27, 1971); also Marjorie Mazel Hecht, Fusion Torch Can Create New Raw Materials. (January 1, 2004) posted at http://Larouchepac.com/node/14726
  13. 119.
    Borisov, A.A., et al.: Fusion power plant for water desalination and reuse. Fusion Eng. Design 58–59, 1109 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 120.
    Grant Logan B.: Can we afford ocean desalination to double the fresh water supply for the coming 13 billion people to live on a hot planet? (unpublished)Google Scholar
  15. 121.
    Dean S.O., Poltoratskaia N.: Applications of fusion and plasma device technologies. Plasma Devices Operat. 4 (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 122.
    Dean, S.O.: Applications of plasma and fusion research. J. Fusion Energ. 14, 251 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 123.
    Dean S.O.: Plasmas: the fourth state of matter. The World and I Magazine (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 124.
    Dean S.O.: The plasma touch. The World and I Magazine (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fusion Power AssociatesGaithersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations