Abstract
Today’s Internet search engines are highly effective in returning relevant web pages to users in fractions of seconds. Yet interactions with search engines are far from trouble free. When interacting with search engines, users experience a variety of troubles, which are still poorly understood. One particular kind of trouble stems from users’ prior knowledge about entities of interest, particularly regarding their names. This study examines how referential practice is organized in the context of search-engine interactions. It finds that, as in conversation, users employ naming in their queries to refer to entities if they can. However, when they do not know the name, or a name fails, they attempt a two-stage search: first they search for the entity name, using generic descriptions combined with image search, and second, if the name is found, they formulate subsequent queries using that name. Computer interaction analysis is used to reveal formal features of users’ referential practices from recordings of screen video with eye tracking and design recommendations for search engines are offered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Tracker loses eyes for most of this excerpt.
References
Aula A, Jhaveri N, Käki M (2008) Information search and re-access strategies of experienced web users. In: Proceedings of the WWW2005, ACM Press, New York, pp 583–592
Aula A, Khan RM, Guan Z (2010) How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? In: Proceedings of the CHI2010, ACM Press, New York, pp 35–44
Balasubramanian N, Kumaran G, Carvalho VR (2010) Exploring reductions for long web queries. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR’10, ACM, New York, pp 571–578
Brendsky M, Croft WB (2008) Discovering key concepts in verbose queries. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR’08, ACM, New York, pp 491–498
Chai JY, Zhang C, Jin R (2007) An empirical investigation of user term feedback in text-based targeted image search. ACM Trans Inform Syst 25(1):1–25
Fallows D (2008) Search engine use. Pew Internet & American Life Project. www.pewinternet.org.
Feild H, Allan J, Jones R (2010) Predicting searcher frustration. Proceedings of the SIGIR’10, ACM Press, New York, pp 34–41
Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood
Hassan A, Jones R, Kinkner KL (2010) Beyond DCG: user behavior as a predictor of a successful search. In: Proceedings of the WSDM’10, ACM, New York
Hitwise (2010) Top 20 Sites and Engines as of 9/20/10. www.hitwise.com
Jefferson G (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner G (ed) Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 13–31
Liu Y, Belkin NJ (2008) Query reformulation, search performance, and term suggestion devices in question-answering tasks. In: Proceedings of the IIiX’08, information interaction in context, ACM, London
Moore RJ (2008) When names fail: referential practice in face-to-face service encounters. Lang Soc 37(3):385–413
Moore RJ, Churchill EF (2011) Computer interaction analysis: toward an empirical approach to understanding user practice and eye gaze in GUI-based interaction. Comput Support Cooper Work 20:497–528
Moore RJ, Churchill EF, Kantamneni RGP (2011) Three sequential positions of query repair in interactions with internet search engines. In: Proceedings of the CSCW’11, ACM, New York
Rieh SY, Xie H (2006) Analysis of multiple query reformulations on the web: the interactive information retrieval context. Inform Process Manage 42:751–768
Sacks H, Schegloff EA (1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In: Psathas G (ed) Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology. Irvington, New York, pp 15–21
Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696–735
Suchman L (1987) plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, New York
Wright RD, Ward LM (2008) Orienting of attention. Oxford University Press, New York
Acknowledgments
I thank Prasad Kantamneni of Yahoo!’s Human Perception Center Of Excellence for the use of eye-tracking facilities and help with study design.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moore, R.J. (2013). A Name Is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Referential Practice in Human Interactions with Internet Search Engines. In: Neustein, A., Markowitz, J. (eds) Mobile Speech and Advanced Natural Language Solutions. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6018-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6018-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6017-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6018-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)