Center Development and Practical Considerations

  • Michael Seropian
  • Bonnie Driggers
  • Jesika Gavilanes
Chapter

Abstract

Simulation is emerging as a major strategy in the delivery of healthcare training and assessment. Successful simulation programs, especially those that are part of large organizations, have evolved through deliberate attention to detail across a variety of domains and variables. Simply purchasing the equipment or building a facility does not make a simulation program. Consideration of governance, personnel, equipment, expertise, and operations are a few of the critical domains that should be addressed by all programs. Many of the principles that are outlined in this chapter come from established business practices that deal with complex environments. While all principles will not apply to all programs, it is still a worthwhile exercise to create a checklist from these principles to help improve the likelihood that a simulation program will succeed.

Keywords

Simulation center Simulation Program development Simulation program Simulation facility 

References

  1. 1.
    Seropian MA, Brown K, Gavilanes JS, Driggers B. Simulation: not just a mannequin. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43(4):164–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seropian MA, Brown K, Gavilanes JS, Driggers B. An approach to simulation program development. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43(4):170–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seropian MA. General concepts in full scale simulation: getting started. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(6):1695–705.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murray DJ. Current trends in simulation training in anesthesia: a review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011;77(5):528–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tews MC, Hamilton GC. Integrating emergency medicine principles and experience throughout the medical school curriculum: why and how. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(10):1072–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moore MH. Creating public value: strategic management in ­government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahmed K, Amer T, Challacombe B, Jaye P, Dasgupta P, Khan MS. How to develop a simulation programme in urology. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1698–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Passiment M, Sacks H, Huang G: Medical Simulation in Medical Education: Results of an AAMC Survey. Association of American Medical Colleges 2011. https://www.aamc.org/download/259760/data/medicalsimulationinmedicaleducationanaamcsurvey.pdf
  9. 9.
    Kim S, Ross B, Wright A, Wu M, Benedetti T, Leland F, et al. Halting the revolving door of faculty turnover recruiting and retaining clinician educators in an academic medical simulation center. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(3):168–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Harris RP et al. Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(3 Suppl):21–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melnyck BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in healthcare. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stetler CB, Morsi D, Rucki S, Broughton S, Corrigan B, Fitzgerald J, et al. Utilization-focused integrative reviews in a nursing service. Appl Nurs Res. 1998;11:195–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schneider B, Carnoy M, Kilpatrick J, Schmidt WH. Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs: a think tank white paper prepared under the auspices of the American Educational Research Association Grants Program. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association, 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Seropian
    • 1
  • Bonnie Driggers
    • 2
  • Jesika Gavilanes
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of NursingOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Statewide Simulation, Simulation and Clinical Learning Center School of NursingOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations