Abstract
The International Conference on Harmonization started in 1989. An overview has been given about milestones and history of the progress, focused on the safety topics.
Some reflections have been given about differences in approaches between the authorities involved and the legal bases that in some cases have also led to differences in scientific approaches. Harmonization of guidance content is much easier than harmonization of the systems.
Looking back on the ICH process after more than 20 years can teach us that by investing significant effort, an in-depth mutual understanding has been reached between the various regions and also between pharmaceutical industry and regulators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cone M (2001) Proceedings of the fifth international conference on harmonisation, San Diego 2000. The Regulatory Press, 698p
Contrera JF, Aub D, Barbehenn E, Belair E, Chen C, Evoniuk G, Mainigi K, Mielach F, Sancilio L (1993) A retrospective comparison of the results of 6 and 12 months non-rodent toxicity studies. Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev 12(1):63–76
Contrera JF, Jacobs AC, Prasanna HR, Mehta M, Schmidt WJ, DeGeorge JJ (1995) A systemic exposure-based alternative to the maximum tolerated dose for carcinogenicity studies of human therapeutics. J Am Coll Toxicol 14:1–10
Contrera JF, Jacobs AC, DeGeorge JJ (1997) Carcinogenicity testing and the evaluation of regulatory requirements for pharmaceuticals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 25:130–145
D’Arcy PF, Harron DWG (1992) Proceedings of the first international conference on harmonisation, Brussels, 1991. Queen’s University, Belfast, 590p
D’Arcy PF, Harron DWG (1994) Proceedings of the second international conference on harmonisation, Orlando 1993. Queen’s University, Belfast, 736p
D’Arcy PF, Harron DWG (1996) Proceedings of the third international conference on harmonisation, Yokohama 1995. Queen’s University, Belfast, 998p
D’Arcy PF, Harron DWG (1998) Proceedings of the fourth international conference on harmonisation, Brussels, 1997. Queen’s University, Belfast, 1158p
Food and Drug Administration. Carcinogenicity study protocol submissions. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm065014.htm. Accessed 22 Feb 2002
Hayashi Y (1991) No effect dose vs no toxic effect dose and post dosing reversibility/’delayed toxicity’. In: D’Arcy PF, Harron DWG (eds) Proceedings of the second international conference on harmonisation, Brussels, 1991. Queen’s University, Belfast, pp 191–193
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Laan, J.W., DeGeorge, J.J. (2013). The International Conference on Harmonisation: History of Safety Guidelines. In: van der Laan, J., DeGeorge, J. (eds) Global Approach in Safety Testing. AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5950-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5950-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5949-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5950-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)