Abstract
This chapter discusses definitions of peace and reconciliation in a sample of respondents from three Balkan states and Russia. Distinctions between a positive and negative peace were considered, as well as peace building and reconciliation as processes of seeking genuine, just, and enduring ends to a conflict. The national context for peace and reconciliation in the region was discussed along with consideration of the region’s historical stigmatization. A strong inclination toward positive peace and a belief that it could be achieved through a demanding process were expressed by respondents in all four countries. Exploratory analyses revealed group differences in definitions based on gender, military service history, and engagement in peace protests; for example, women were more likely than men to give positive peace definitions, while men were more likely than women and non-protestors were more likely than protestors to question the achievability of peace. The majority of respondents defined reconciliation as a process, although there were again some demographic group differences in definitions. For example, women were more likely than men to give process definitions, and respondents with military service history were more likely than nonmilitary respondents to question the achievability of reconciliation. Awareness that a number of acts are necessary to achieve reconciliation (and therefore peace) is present, perhaps stemming from historical and current experiences of participants. Lack of future orientation in the answers of respondents could be concerning.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bar Tal, D. (2011). Introduction: Conflicts and social psychology. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution (pp. 1–38). New York: Psychology Press.
Editors World Politics Review. (2012). Global insider: Russian peacekeeping grows with Russian self-identity. World Politics Review. Available from http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/trend-lines/11442/global-insider-russian-peacekeeping-grows-with-russian-self-identity Accessed 18 Apr 2012.
Fry, D. P. (2007). Beyond war: The human potential for peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.
Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305.
Galtung, J. (2007). A mini theory of peace. http://www.transnational.org/Resources_Treasures/2007/Galtung_MiniTheory.html. Accessed 16 Jan 2012.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.
Grewal, B. J. (2003). Johan Galtung: Positive and negative peace. https://apps.drawloop.com/published/10379/download. Accessed 19 Jan 2012.
Jezernik, B. (2004). The Balkans in the gaze of western travellers. London: Saqi Books.
Kelman, H. C. (2008). Reconciliation from a social-psychological perspective. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 15–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kos, D. (1993). Racionalnost neformalnih prostorov, (Rationality of nonformal spaces). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
Mackinlay, J., & Cross, P. (2003). Regional peacekeepers. Tokyo/New York: United Nations University Press.
Malley-Morrison, K. (2009). Set introduction. In K. Malley-Morrison (Ed.), State violence and the right to peace (pp. xiii–xxiv). Santa Barbara: Praeger Security International and ABC Clio.
Malley-Morrison, K., Daskalopoulos, M., & You, H.-S. (2006). International perspectives on governmental aggression. International Psychology Reporter, (Vol. 1, pp. 19–20).
Rouhana, N. N. (2011). Key issues in reconciliation: Challenging traditional assumptions on conflict resolution and power dynamics. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution (pp. 291–314). New York: Psychology Press. http://nato.gov.si/eng/topic/peacekeeping-operations/army/.
Sokolov, A. V. (1997). Russian peace-keeping forces in the post-Soviet area. In M. Kaldor & B. Vashee (Eds.), New wars: Restructuring the global military sector. London: Pinter.
Vatansever, M. (2011). Turkish-Greek relations: One step forward, two steps back. IRST Anatolia Daily, 11:17. Available from http://www.anatoliadaily.com/irst/index.php/main-subjects/europe/233-turkish-greek-relations-one-step-forward-two-steps-back?format=pdf Accessed 18 Apr 2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miheljak, V. et al. (2013). Definitions of Peace and Reconciliation in Russia and the Balkans. In: Malley-Morrison, K., Mercurio, A., Twose, G. (eds) International Handbook of Peace and Reconciliation. Peace Psychology Book Series, vol 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5933-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5933-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5932-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5933-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)