Abstract
This chapter focused on implicit theories regarding political apologies. Political apologies differ from individual apologies in that they generally are concerned not only with wrongful acts but also with a distinct political quality of wrongful acts committed under the mantel of the nation. Participants from Western Europe, Russia and the Balkan Peninsula, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, South and Southeast Asia, East Asia, and the UK/Anglo regions gave qualitative responses regarding the effectiveness of one nation’s apology for reconciliation between two countries, as well as what actions would need to be taken to achieve true reconciliation. Overwhelmingly, participants across all regions – developed versus developing country, Eastern versus Western, or colonized versus colonizer – stated that an apology could help the reconciliation process in one way or another. Participants in South and Southeast Asia, Africa, East Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East offered frequent responses indicating an apology could lead to reconciliation, while Africa and the UK/Anglo regions indicated an apology could lead to healing. The most frequent responses from Russia and the Balkans, East Asia, the Middle East, South and Southeast Asia, and Africa said an apology was a necessary component of reconciliation. In regard to the steps that were needed to make an apology effective, a high proportion of response (84–97 %) indicated that reconciliation is achievable following an apology if certain steps are taken. For instance, participants from East Asia and Western Europe noted that the sincerity of the apology was most important. Africa and Russia and the Balkans had more responses indicating that recognition of wrongdoing was important, while the Middle East and Russia and the Balkans had frequent responses favoring a state sanctioned diplomatic response or treaty. Interestingly, Africa and South and Southeast Asia were most in favor of monetary aid as a step toward reconciliation, perhaps reflecting the more recent experiences of those countries with colonization, war/conflict, and widespread poverty.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albert, C. (2009). The peacebuilding elements of the Belfast Agreement and the transformation of the Northern Ireland conflict. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Apology, (n.d.). Retrieved March 14, 2012, from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/apology.
Aquinio, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offenses as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 653–668.
Bardacke, T. (1998, December 30). Khmer Rouge chiefs apologise. Financial Times, p. 4.
Basic Principles, (n.d.). Basic principles and guidelines on the right to a remedy and reparation for victims of gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law. Retrieved from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights website http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/remedy.htm.
Bergen, J. M. (2007). Church apologies and the politics of reconciliation. Vision: A Journal for Church and Theology, Spring 8(1), pp. 80–87.
Celermajer, D. (2008). Apology and the possibility of ethical politics. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 9(1), 14–34. Retrieved from http://www.jcrt.org/archives/09.1/Celermajer.pdf.
Daye, R. (2004). Political forgiveness: Lessons from South Africa. Maryknoll, NY: University of Michigan/Orbis Books.
De Klerk Blames Rogue Security Units (1996, August 22). De Klerk blames rogue security units for Apartheid terror. The New York Times, p. A5.
Erlich, R. (2000, May 26). Aborigine reconciliation faltering. St. Petersburg Times, p. A13.
Fehr, R., & Gelfand, M. J. (2010). When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims’ self-construals facilitates forgiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113, 37–50.
Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 894–914.
Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., Holcome, K. M., Dyer, N., Ohbuchi, K., & Fukuno, M. (2001). Cultural influences on cultural representations of conflict: Interpretations of conflict episodes in the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1059–1074.
Gerstenzang, J., & Darling, J. (1999, March 11). Clinton gives apology for U.S. role in Guatemala; Central America: President says support for rightists was wrong. He also vows to push for end to immigration laws favoring those fleeing leftist regimes. The Los Angeles Times, p. 1.
Harris, A. H. S., & Thoresen, C. E. (2005). Forgiveness, unforgiveness, health, and disease. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 321–334). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Hennessey, T. (2001). Northern Ireland peace process: Ending the troubles? New York: Palgrave.
Isikoff, M. (1990, October 10). Delayed reparations and an apology; Japanese Americans held during war get first checks. The Washington Post, p. A1.
Kim, E. (2010, August, 2011). Japan’s leader apologizes for Korean occupation; Harsh colonial rule ended in 1945, but emotional wounds have not healed. Chicago Tribune, p. 17.
Lawler, K., Younger, J., Piferi, R. L., Billington, E., Jobe, R., Edmondson, K., & Jones, W. (2003). A change of heart: Cardiovascular correlates of forgiveness in response to interpersonal conflict. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26(5), 373–393.
Lawler-Row, K., Scott, C. A., Raines, R. L., Edlis-Matityahou, M., & Moore, E. (2007). The varieties of forgiveness experience: Working toward a comprehensive definition of forgiveness. Journal of Religion and Health, 46(2), 233–248.
McCullough, M. E., Luna, L. R., Berry, J. W., Tabak, B. A., & Bono, G. (2010). On the form and function of forgiving: Modeling the time-forgiveness relationship and testing the valuable relationships hypothesis. Emotion, 10, 358–376.
McLernon, F., Cairns, E., Hewstone, M., & Smith, R. (2004). The development of intergroup forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 60(3), 587–601.
Moscow Apologizes (1981, October 31). Moscow apologizes to Sweden over sub: Explanation is demanded. New York Times, p. 1.
Mydans, S. (2001, August 21). As Cambodia prepares to try Khmer Rouge leaders for massacres, they deny guilt. The New York Times, p. A9.
Shanahan, T. (2009). The provisional Irish Republican Army and the morality of terrorism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Strelan, P., & Covic, T. (2006). A review of forgiveness processes and models and a coping framework to guide future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(10), 1059–1085.
Thompson, K. (2009, June 19). Senate backs apology for slavery; Resolution specifies that it cannot be used in reparations cases. The Washington Post, p. A5.
Top ten Apologies, (n.d.). Retrieved March 16, 2012, from Time Magazine website, http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1913028_1913030_1913018,00.html.
Toussant, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 145(6), 673–685.
Welsh, J., & Ulltveit-Moe, T. (2000). Guatemalan government acknowledges human-rights abuses. The Lancet, 356(9239), 1436.
Willy Brandt (1992, October 9). Willy Brandt; German leader, Nobel laureate. Chicago Tribune, C edition, p. 10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rapoza, K.A., Lalikian, M. (2013). Integrative Summary on Apology and Forgiveness. In: Malley-Morrison, K., Mercurio, A., Twose, G. (eds) International Handbook of Peace and Reconciliation. Peace Psychology Book Series, vol 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5933-0_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5933-0_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5932-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5933-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)