Advertisement

Rodent Urinary Proteins: Genetic Identity Signals and Pheromones

  • Jane L. Hurst
  • Robert J. Beynon
Chapter

Abstract

Many rodents communicate through scent marks that contain a complex mixture of volatile components along with species-specific proteins of the lipocalin family. These proteins have an internal cavity that binds low molecular weight hydrophobic volatiles and can slow their release from scent marks, while the proteins themselves are detected through receptors in the vomeronasal organ. By far the best studied urinary lipocalins to date are the major urinary proteins (MUPs) of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus). MUPs are encoded by a cluster of >21 genes on mouse chromosome 4 that has undergone recent rapid expansion in this species. Mice of both sexes make substantial investment in these proteins, with considerable polymorphism in the patterns of MUPs expressed between individuals. This MUP pattern provides the main genetic identity signal in mouse urine scent used to recognise individual scent owners, close kin, and can also be used to assess genetic heterozygosity. A male-specific atypical MUP named darcin acts as a sex pheromone, responsible for eliciting instinctive female sexual attraction to spend time near male urinary scent marks. Importantly, darcin also stimulates rapid associative learning, such that females that contact darcin learn and are subsequently attracted to the associated airborne odour of that particular male but not to airborne odours of other males. This pheromone-induced mechanism of learned attraction targets and reinforces sexual attraction towards a particular male, allowing sexual attraction to males to be inherent but also selective. Comparative studies of other rodents are starting to reveal considerable diversity in concentration, sexual ­dimorphism and polymorphic complexity of lipocalins in scent signals; these differences are likely to reflect species-specific requirements for recognition and ­assessment through scent.

Keywords

Major Histocompatibility Complex House Mouse Sexual Attraction Scent Mark Vomeronasal Organ 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Amanda Davidson, Sarah Roberts, Duncan Robertson, Stuart Armstrong, Michael Thom, Amy Sherborne, John Waters, Felicity Fair and Rick Humphries for help in collecting data in Figs. 9.2 and 9.4 and additional data referred to in the text. This work was supported by research grants from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and from the Natural Environment Research Council.

References

  1. Armstrong SD, Robertson DHL, Cheetham SA, Hurst JL, Beynon RJ (2005) Structural and ­functional differences in isoforms of mouse major urinary proteins: a male-specific protein that preferentially binds a male pheromone. Biochem J 391:343–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacchini A, Gaetani E, Cavaggioni A (1992) Pheromone binding proteins of the mouse, Mus musculus. Experientia 48:419–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beynon RJ, Hurst JL (2004) Urinary proteins and the modulation of chemical scents in mice and rats. Peptides 25:1553–1563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beynon RJ, Turton MJ, Robertson DHL, Armstrong SD, MacNicoll A, Humphries RE, Hurst JL (2008) Urinary lipocalins in rodenta: is there a generic model? In: Hurst JL, Beynon RJ, Roberts SC, Wyatt TD (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 11. Springer, New York, pp 37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briand L, Trotier D, Pernollet JC (2004) Aphrodisin, an aphrodisiac lipocalin secreted in hamster vaginal secretions. Peptides 25:1545–1552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamero P, Marton TF, Logan DW, Flanagan K, Cruz JR, Saghatelian A, Cravatt BF, Stowers L (2007) Identification of protein pheromones that promote aggressive behaviour. Nature 450:899–902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheetham SA, Thom MD, Jury F, Ollier WER, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL (2007) The genetic basis of individual recognition signals in the mouse. Curr Biol 17:1771–1777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheetham SA, Smith AL, Armstrong SD, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL (2009) Limited variation in the major urinary proteins of laboratory mice. Physiol Behav 96:253–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flower DR (1996) The lipocalin protein family: structure and function. Biochem J 318(Pt 1):1–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gardner A, West SA (2007) Social evolution: the decline and fall of genetic kin recognition. Curr Biol 17:R810–R812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garratt M, Stockley P, Armstrong SD, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL (2011a) The scent of senescence: sexual signalling and female preference in house mice. J Evol Biol 24:2398–2409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garratt M, Vasilaki A, Stockley P, McArdle F, Jackson M, Hurst JL (2011b) Is oxidative stress a physiological cost of reproduction? An experimental test in house mice. Proc Biol Sci 278:1098–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garratt M, McArdle F, Stockley P, Vasilaki A, Beynon RJ, Jackson M, Hurst JL (2012) Tissue dependent changes in oxidative damage with male reproductive effort in house mice. Funct Ecol 26(2):423–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Humphries RE, Robertson DHL, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL (1999) Unravelling the chemical basis of competitive scent marking in house mice. Anim Behav 58:1177–1190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurst JL (1990) Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus rutty. I. Communication between males. Anim Behav 40:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hurst JL, Beynon RJ (2008) Chemical communication in societies of rodents. In: D’Ettorre P, Hughes DP (eds) Sociobiology of communication: an interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 97–118Google Scholar
  17. Hurst JL, Robertson DHL, Tolladay U, Beynon RJ (1998) Proteins in urine scent marks of male house mice extend the longevity of olfactory signals. Anim Behav 55:1289–1297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurst JL, Payne CE, Nevison CM, Marie AD, Humphries RE, Robertson DHL, Cavaggioni A, Beynon RJ (2001) Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature 414:631–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones RB, Nowell NW (1974) A comparison of the aversive and female attractant properties of urine from dominant and subordinate male mice. Anim Learn Behav 2:141–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jordan WC, Bruford MW (1998) New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity 81:239–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karlson P, Luscher M (1959) Pheromones: a new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature 183:55–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kavaliers M, Choleris E, Pfaff DW (2005) Recognition and avoidance of the odors of parasitized conspecifics and predators: differential genomic correlates. Neurosci Biobehav R 29:1347–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kimoto H, Sato K, Nodari F, Haga S, Holy TE, Touhara K (2007) Sex- and strain-specific expression and vomeronasal activity of mouse ESP family peptides. Curr Biol 17:1879–1884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knopf JL, Gallagher JF, Held WA (1983) Differential multihormonal regulation of the mouse major urinary protein gene family in the liver. Mol Cell Biol 3:2232–2240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kulkarni AB, Gubits RM, Feigelson P (1985) Developmental and hormonal regulation of alpha 2u-globulin gene transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:2579–2582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurtz DT (1981) Rat alpha 2u globulin is encoded by a multigene family. J Mol Appl Genet 1:29–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kwak J, Josue J, Faranda A, Opiekun MC, Preti G, Osada K, Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK (2011) Butylated hydroxytoluene is a ligand of urinary proteins derived from female mice. Chem Senses 36:443–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leinders-Zufall T, Lane AP, Puche AC, Ma W, Novotny MV, Shipley MT, Zufall F (2000) Ultrasensitive pheromone detection by mammalian vomeronasal neurons. Nature 405:792–796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Logan DW, Marton TF, Stowers L (2008) Species specificity in major urinary proteins by parallel evolution. PLoS One 3:e3280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacInnes JI, Nozik ES, Kurtz DT (1986) Tissue-specific expression of the rat alpha2u globulin gene family. Mol Cell Biol 6:3563–3567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Manning CJ, Potts WK, Wakeland EK, Dewsbury DA (1992) What’s wrong with MHC mate choice experiments? In: Doty RL, Muller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 6. Plenum, New York, pp 229–235Google Scholar
  32. Marie AD, Veggerby C, Robertson DHL, Gaskell SJ, Hubbard SJ, Martinsen L, Hurst JL, Beynon RJ (2001) Effect of polymorphisms on ligand binding by mouse major urinary proteins. Protein Sci 10:411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McFadyen DA, Locke J (2000) High-resolution fish mapping of the rat alpha2u-globulin multigene family. Mamm Genome 11:292–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moncho-Bogani J, Lanuza E, Hernandez A, Novejarque A, Martinez-Garcia F (2002) Attractive properties of sexual pheromones in mice: innate or learned? Physiol Behav 77:167–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mossman CA, Drickamer LC (1996) Odor preferences of female house mice (Mus domesticus) in seminatural enclosures. J Comp Psychol 110:131–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mudge JM, Armstrong SD, McLaren K, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL, Nicholson C, Robertson DH, Wilming LG, Harrow JL (2008) Dynamic instability of the major urinary protein gene family revealed by genomic and phenotypic comparison between c57 and 129 strain mice. Genome Biol 9:R91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Novotny M, Harvey S, Jemiolo B, Alberts J (1985) Synthetic pheromones that promote inter-male aggression in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:2059–2061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Novotny MV, Ma W, Wiesler D, Zidek L (1999) Positive identification of the puberty-accelerating pheromone of the house mouse: the volatile ligands associating with the major urinary protein. Proc R Soc B 266:2017–2022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paterson S, Hurst JL (2009) How effective is recognition of siblings on the basis of genotype? J Evol Biol 22:1875–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Penn DJ (2002) The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology 108:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Penn D, Schneider G, White K, Slev P, Potts W (1998) Influenza infection neutralizes the attractiveness of male odour to female mice (Mus musculus). Ethology 104:685–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perez-Miller S, Zou Q, Novotny MV, Hurley TD (2010) High resolution x-ray structures of mouse major urinary protein nasal isoform in complex with pheromones. Protein Sci 19:1469–1479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phelan MM, McLean L, Simpson DM, Hurst JL, Beynon RJ, Lian LY (2010) 1H, 15N and 13C resonance assignment of darcin, a mouse major urinary protein. Biomol NMR Assign 4:239–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramm SA, Cheetham SA, Hurst JL (2008) Encoding choosiness: female attraction requires prior physical contact with individual male scents in mice. Proc R Soc B 275:1727–1735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rich TJ, Hurst JL (1999) The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates. Anim Behav 58:1027–1037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberts SA, Simpson DM, Armstrong SD, Davidson AJ, Robertson DH, McLean L, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL (2010) Darcin: a male pheromone that stimulates female memory and sexual attraction to an individual male’s odour. BMC Biol 8:75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robertson DHL, Beynon RJ, Evershed RP (1993) Extraction, characterization and binding analysis of two pheromonally active ligands associated with major urinary protein of house mouse (Mus musculus). J Chem Ecol 19:1405–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robertson DHL, Hurst JL, Hubbard S, Gaskell SJ, Beynon RJ (1998) Ligands of urinary lipocalins from the mouse: uptake of environmentally derived chemicals. J Chem Ecol 24:1127–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robertson DHL, Marie AD, Veggerby C, Hurst JL, Beynon RJ (2001) Characteristics of ligand binding and release by major urinary proteins. In: Marchlewska-Koj A, Muller-Schwarze D, Lepri J (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 9. Plenum Press, New York, pp 169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robertson DHL, Hurst JL, Searle JB, Gunduz I, Beynon RJ (2007) Characterization and ­comparison of major urinary proteins from the house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus, and the aboriginal mouse, Mus macedonicus. J Chem Ecol 33:613–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shahan K, Denaro M, Gilmartin M, Shi Y, Derman E (1987) Expression of six mouse major ­urinary protein genes in the mammary, parotid, sublingual, submaxillary, and lachrymal glands and in the liver. Mol Cell Biol 7:1947–1954PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sharrow SD, Vaughn JL, Zidek L, Novotny MV, Stone MJ (2002) Pheromone binding by polymorphic mouse major urinary proteins. Protein Sci 11:2247–2256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shaw PH, Held WA, Hastie ND (1983) The gene family for major urinary proteins: expression in several secretory tissues of the mouse. Cell 32:755–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sherborne AL, Thom MD, Paterson S, Jury F, Ollier WER, Stockley P, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL (2007) The genetic basis of inbreeding avoidance in house mice. Curr Biol 17:2061–2066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Singer AG, Tsuchiya H, Wellington JL, Beauchamp GK, Yamazaki K (1993) Chemistry of odortypes in mice—fractionation and bioassay. J Chem Ecol 19:569–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stopka P, Janotova K, Heyrovsky D (2007) The advertisement role of major urinary proteins in mice. Physiol Behav 91:667–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stopkova R, Zdrahal Z, Ryba S, Sedo O, Sandera M, Stopka P (2010) Novel OBP genes similar to hamster aphrodisin in the bank vole, Myodes glareolus. BMC Genomics 11:45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Talley HM, Laukaitis CM, Karn RC (2001) Female preference for male saliva: implications for sexual isolation of mus musculus subspecies. Evolution 55:631–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thom MD, Stockley P, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL (2008) Scent, mate choice and genetic heterozygosity. In: Hurst JL, Beynon RJ, Roberts SC, Wyatt TD (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 11. Springer, New York, pp 291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turton MJ, Robertson DHL, Smith JR, Hurst JL, Beynon RJ (2010) Roborovskin, a lipocalin in the urine of the roborovski hamster, phodopus roborovskii. Chem Senses 35:675–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wyatt TD (2010) Pheromones and signature mixtures: defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 196:685–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mammalian Behaviour and Evolution Group, Institute of Integrative BiologyUniversity of LiverpoolNestonUK
  2. 2.Protein Function Group, Institute of Integrative BiologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations