Skip to main content

Voles in Space: Effects of Predator Odour on Microtus arvalis Breeding Females

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 12
  • 1266 Accesses

Abstract

Voles show an array of adaptations to predation risk. The chance of encountering a specialist, mustelid predator is best minimised by reduced mobility and limited use of space; voles may also shift their activity in time. We inquired whether reproductively active female common voles (Microtus arvalis) employ these adaptations in response to olfactory cues of a ferret. We used capture locations and radio-tracking fixes to examine long-term (home range) and short-term (activity range) space use under odour-simulated mustelid predation risk. Range areas were computed with two methods: minimum convex polygon and local convex hull. Using radio-tracking data, we also measured movement distances and distances to the sources of predator odour. The common vole is predominantly diurnal, with activity peaks at dusk and dawn. Using two indexes of circadian activity, we investigated whether females change their temporal behaviour in response to mustelid odours. Non-predator odours served as controls. We found no effect of mustelid odour on home range or activity range size. Additionally, predator odours did not affect movement distances and temporal behaviour. However, females did avoid areas with mustelid odour. We argue that reproductively active females cannot afford spatial and temporal adaptations, as these limit foraging opportunities, and ultimately, female fecundity. Yet, avoidance of ferret odour confirms its significance for breeding female voles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson PK (1986) Foraging range in mice and voles: the role of risk. Can J Zool 64:2645–2653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M (2010) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-37. URL:http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4

  • Bolbroe T, Jeppesen LL, Leirs H (2000) Behavioural response of field voles under mustelid predation risk in the laboratory: more than neophobia. Ann Zool Fenn 37:169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Börger L, Franconi N, De Michele G, Gantz A, Meschi F, Manica A, Lovari S, Coulson T (2006) Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. J Anim Ecol 75:1393–1405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borowski Z (1998) Influence of weasel (Mustela nivalis Linnaeus, 1766) odour on spatial behaviour of root voles (Microtus oeconomus Pallas, 1776). Can J Zool 76:1799–1804

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowski Z, Owadowska E (2010) Field vole (Microtus agrestis) seasonal spacing behavior: the effect of predation risk by mustelids. Naturwissenschaften 97:487–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burgman MA, Fox JC (2003) Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Anim Conserv 6:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C (2006) The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing BS (1985) Estrous mice and vulnerability to weasel predation. Ecology 66:1976–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccard J, Pusenius J, Sundell J, Halle S, Ylönen H (2008) Foraging patterns of voles at heterogeneous avian and uniform mustelid predation risk. Oecologia 157:725–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuelling O, Halle S (2004) Breeding suppression in free-ranging grey-sided voles under the influence of predator odour. Oecologia 138:151–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerkema MP, Daan S (1985) Ultradian rhythms in behavior: the case of the common vole (Microtus arvalis). Exp Brain Res Suppl 12:11–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz WM, Wilmers CC (2004) A local nearest-neighbor convex-hull construction of home ranges and utilization distributions. Ecography 27:489–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz WM, Fortmann-Roe S, Cross PC, Lyons AJ, Ryan SJ, Wilmers CC (2007) LoCoH: nonparametric kernel methods for constructing home ranges and utilization distributions. PLoS One 2:e207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman ML (1984) The response of prey to stoat (Mustela erminea) scent. J Zool 202:419–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halle S (1993) Diel pattern of predation risk in microtine rodents. Oikos 68:510–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halle S (1995) Diel pattern of locomotor activity in populations of root voles, Microtus oeconomus. J Biol Rhythms 10:211–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halle S, Lehmann U (1987) Circadian activity patterns, photoperiodic responses and population cycles in voles. Oecologia 71:568–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck M, Davison J, Roper TJ (2008) Comparison of two sampling protocols and four home-range estimators using radio-tracking data from urban badgers Meles meles. Wildlife Biol 14:467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B (1990) Effect of a predators visit on the spatial distribution of bank voles—experiments with weasels. Can J Zool 68:660–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jochym M, Halle S (2012) To breed, or not to breed? Predation risk induces breeding suppression in common voles. Oecologia 170:943–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward RE (1993) Wildlife radio tagging: equipment, field techniques and data analysis, 3rd edn. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela E, Ylönen H (1995) Suppressed breeding in the field vole (Microtus agrestis)—an adaptation to cyclically fluctuating predation risk. Behav Ecol 6:311–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann U, Sommersberg CW (1980) Activity patterns of the common vole, Microtus arvalis—automatic recording of behavior in an enclosure. Oecologia 47:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison DM (1985) Activity rhythms and spacing. In: Tamarin RH (ed) Biology of new world microtus. American Society of Mammalogists, Shippensburg, PA, pp 373–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Masini CV, Sauer S, Campeau S (2005) Ferret odor as a processive stress model in rats: neurochemical, behavioral, and endocrine evidence. Behav Neurosci 119:280–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazurkiewicz M (1971) Shape, size and distribution of home ranges of Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780). Acta Theriol 16:23–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkens M, Harestad AS, Sullivan TP (1991) Cover and efficacy of predator-based repellents for Townsend vole, Microtus townsendii. J Chem Ecol 17:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migula P (1969) Bioenergetics of pregnancy and lactation in European common vole. Acta Theriol 14:167–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E (1998) Does mobility or sex of voles affect risk of predation by mammalian predators? Ecology 79:226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons GJ, Bondrup-Nielsen S (1996) Experimental analysis of behaviour of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) to odours of the short-tailed weasel (Mustela erminea). Ecoscience 3:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.12.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051- 07-0. URL:http://www.R-project.org

  • Reichstein H (1960) Untersuchungen zum Aktionsraum und zum Revierverhalten der Feldmaus. Z Säugetierkd 25:150–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds P, Gorman ML (1994) Seasonal variation in the activity patterns of the Orkney vole Microtus arvalis orcadensis. J Zool 233:605–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylönen H, Ronkainen H (1994) Breeding suppression in the bank vole as antipredatory adaptation in a predictable environment. Evol Ecol 8:658–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank everyone who helped with the CMR experiment and the radio-tracking of voles, especially Magda Bereza, Daniel Bergelt, Volkmar Haus, Anna Henning, Kerstin Parker and Amelie Zander. MJ was funded with a stipend from the International Max Planck Research School for Chemical Ecology in Jena.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mateusz Jochym .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jochym, M., Halle, S. (2013). Voles in Space: Effects of Predator Odour on Microtus arvalis Breeding Females. In: East, M., Dehnhard, M. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 12. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5927-9_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics