Abstract
Voles show an array of adaptations to predation risk. The chance of encountering a specialist, mustelid predator is best minimised by reduced mobility and limited use of space; voles may also shift their activity in time. We inquired whether reproductively active female common voles (Microtus arvalis) employ these adaptations in response to olfactory cues of a ferret. We used capture locations and radio-tracking fixes to examine long-term (home range) and short-term (activity range) space use under odour-simulated mustelid predation risk. Range areas were computed with two methods: minimum convex polygon and local convex hull. Using radio-tracking data, we also measured movement distances and distances to the sources of predator odour. The common vole is predominantly diurnal, with activity peaks at dusk and dawn. Using two indexes of circadian activity, we investigated whether females change their temporal behaviour in response to mustelid odours. Non-predator odours served as controls. We found no effect of mustelid odour on home range or activity range size. Additionally, predator odours did not affect movement distances and temporal behaviour. However, females did avoid areas with mustelid odour. We argue that reproductively active females cannot afford spatial and temporal adaptations, as these limit foraging opportunities, and ultimately, female fecundity. Yet, avoidance of ferret odour confirms its significance for breeding female voles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson PK (1986) Foraging range in mice and voles: the role of risk. Can J Zool 64:2645–2653
Bates D, Maechler M (2010) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-37. URL:http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
Bolbroe T, Jeppesen LL, Leirs H (2000) Behavioural response of field voles under mustelid predation risk in the laboratory: more than neophobia. Ann Zool Fenn 37:169–178
Börger L, Franconi N, De Michele G, Gantz A, Meschi F, Manica A, Lovari S, Coulson T (2006) Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. J Anim Ecol 75:1393–1405
Borowski Z (1998) Influence of weasel (Mustela nivalis Linnaeus, 1766) odour on spatial behaviour of root voles (Microtus oeconomus Pallas, 1776). Can J Zool 76:1799–1804
Borowski Z, Owadowska E (2010) Field vole (Microtus agrestis) seasonal spacing behavior: the effect of predation risk by mustelids. Naturwissenschaften 97:487–493
Burgman MA, Fox JC (2003) Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Anim Conserv 6:19–28
Calenge C (2006) The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519
Cushing BS (1985) Estrous mice and vulnerability to weasel predation. Ecology 66:1976–1978
Eccard J, Pusenius J, Sundell J, Halle S, Ylönen H (2008) Foraging patterns of voles at heterogeneous avian and uniform mustelid predation risk. Oecologia 157:725–734
Fuelling O, Halle S (2004) Breeding suppression in free-ranging grey-sided voles under the influence of predator odour. Oecologia 138:151–159
Gerkema MP, Daan S (1985) Ultradian rhythms in behavior: the case of the common vole (Microtus arvalis). Exp Brain Res Suppl 12:11–31
Getz WM, Wilmers CC (2004) A local nearest-neighbor convex-hull construction of home ranges and utilization distributions. Ecography 27:489–505
Getz WM, Fortmann-Roe S, Cross PC, Lyons AJ, Ryan SJ, Wilmers CC (2007) LoCoH: nonparametric kernel methods for constructing home ranges and utilization distributions. PLoS One 2:e207
Gorman ML (1984) The response of prey to stoat (Mustela erminea) scent. J Zool 202:419–423
Halle S (1993) Diel pattern of predation risk in microtine rodents. Oikos 68:510–518
Halle S (1995) Diel pattern of locomotor activity in populations of root voles, Microtus oeconomus. J Biol Rhythms 10:211–224
Halle S, Lehmann U (1987) Circadian activity patterns, photoperiodic responses and population cycles in voles. Oecologia 71:568–572
Huck M, Davison J, Roper TJ (2008) Comparison of two sampling protocols and four home-range estimators using radio-tracking data from urban badgers Meles meles. Wildlife Biol 14:467–477
Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B (1990) Effect of a predators visit on the spatial distribution of bank voles—experiments with weasels. Can J Zool 68:660–666
Jochym M, Halle S (2012) To breed, or not to breed? Predation risk induces breeding suppression in common voles. Oecologia 170:943–953
Kenward RE (1993) Wildlife radio tagging: equipment, field techniques and data analysis, 3rd edn. Academic, London
Koskela E, Ylönen H (1995) Suppressed breeding in the field vole (Microtus agrestis)—an adaptation to cyclically fluctuating predation risk. Behav Ecol 6:311–315
Lehmann U, Sommersberg CW (1980) Activity patterns of the common vole, Microtus arvalis—automatic recording of behavior in an enclosure. Oecologia 47:61–75
Madison DM (1985) Activity rhythms and spacing. In: Tamarin RH (ed) Biology of new world microtus. American Society of Mammalogists, Shippensburg, PA, pp 373–419
Masini CV, Sauer S, Campeau S (2005) Ferret odor as a processive stress model in rats: neurochemical, behavioral, and endocrine evidence. Behav Neurosci 119:280–292
Mazurkiewicz M (1971) Shape, size and distribution of home ranges of Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780). Acta Theriol 16:23–60
Merkens M, Harestad AS, Sullivan TP (1991) Cover and efficacy of predator-based repellents for Townsend vole, Microtus townsendii. J Chem Ecol 17:401–412
Migula P (1969) Bioenergetics of pregnancy and lactation in European common vole. Acta Theriol 14:167–179
Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E (1998) Does mobility or sex of voles affect risk of predation by mammalian predators? Ecology 79:226–232
Parsons GJ, Bondrup-Nielsen S (1996) Experimental analysis of behaviour of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) to odours of the short-tailed weasel (Mustela erminea). Ecoscience 3:63–69
R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.12.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051- 07-0. URL:http://www.R-project.org
Reichstein H (1960) Untersuchungen zum Aktionsraum und zum Revierverhalten der Feldmaus. Z Säugetierkd 25:150–169
Reynolds P, Gorman ML (1994) Seasonal variation in the activity patterns of the Orkney vole Microtus arvalis orcadensis. J Zool 233:605–616
Ylönen H, Ronkainen H (1994) Breeding suppression in the bank vole as antipredatory adaptation in a predictable environment. Evol Ecol 8:658–666
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank everyone who helped with the CMR experiment and the radio-tracking of voles, especially Magda Bereza, Daniel Bergelt, Volkmar Haus, Anna Henning, Kerstin Parker and Amelie Zander. MJ was funded with a stipend from the International Max Planck Research School for Chemical Ecology in Jena.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jochym, M., Halle, S. (2013). Voles in Space: Effects of Predator Odour on Microtus arvalis Breeding Females. In: East, M., Dehnhard, M. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 12. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5927-9_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5927-9_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5926-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5927-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)