Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Archaeology ((BRIEFSARCHHERIT,volume 2))

  • 1489 Accesses

Abstract

Tangible objects have served both cosmological and political purposes in China since the Zhou dynastic era (approximately 1,000–250 BCE). In order to assert their own legitimacy, rulers typically would display the bronze and jade ritual objects as well as court seals, scrolls, and tax records of either their ancestors or those whom they had defeated. For the same reason, rulers would attempt to monopolize production of these objects (Elliot and Shambaugh 2005: 5–6). What we now know as “heritage objects” were thus originally collected, preserved, and displayed in China for contemporary political purposes, not because they reflected the past per se or for their aesthetic value. Instead, these imperial objects were believed to enable a communicative link with heaven (see Chang 1983). For example, following their conquest of the Song capital of Kaifeng in 1127 AD, the Jurchen, a seminomadic group from Manchuria, looted the imperial warehouses of art, furniture, scrolls, paintings, musical instruments, and even clothing, all of which they transported to their own capital, present-day Beijing, where they established the Jin Dynasty. The Jurchen capital was in turn conquered by the Mongolian leader Genghis Khan in 1234 AD, who named the city Dadu and built a palace on the site of what is now Beihai Park (Elliot and Shambaugh 2005: 24–28). Similarly, when Zhu Yuanzhang, founder of the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644), overthrew the Mongolian Yuan Dynasty (1271–1368), his forces seized control of an imperial collection that contained artifacts dating from the ninth-century Tang. After this, he ordered the destruction of the Yuan palaces in Beijing and transported these artifacts to his new capital at Nanjing, only to have the third Ming Emperor, Zhu Di, shift the capital back to Beijing in 1421, following the construction of the Forbidden City between 1406 and 1420.

This chapter describes the development of archeology, heritage, and museums in China. By way of introduction, we review the purpose and methods of traditional historiography, the cultivation of an interest among elites in the past during the Song, Ming, and Qing eras, the role of cultural heritage in the late Qing and Republican periods, and the place of history and heritage in the civil war between Communists and Nationalists. We also introduce the key concept of jingdian (“scenic spot”) and discuss their role in the development of a national class of literati and scholars dating back to at least the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lu Dalin has been hailed by state authorities as China’s first anthropologist. In 2010, his tomb, along with those of several relatives, was excavated in Lantian County, near Xian in Shaanxi province (Yang 2010).

  2. 2.

    Prasenjit Duara (1992) argues that the category of racial difference in fact appeared in China during the reign of the Qing Emperor Qianlong (1735–1796), who led an active campaign to codify Manchurian superiority by dint of birth. Duara also argues that the great Taiping Rebellion (1850–1864) was a Nationalist rebellion against Manchu control and led to a Manchu ethnic revival. Other scholars argue that the Taiping Rebellion was a religiously inspired charismatic movement, given that its leader, Hong Xiuquan, claimed to be the brother of Jesus Christ.

Bibliography

  • Chang, Kwang Chih. 1977. “Chinese Archeology since 1949.” Journal of Asian Studies 36(4):623–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Kwang Chih. 1981. Archeology and Chinese historiography. World Archeology 13(2): 156–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Kwang Chih. 1983. Art, myth and ritual: The path to political authority in ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikőtter, Frank. 1992. The discourse of race in modern China. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duara, Prasenjit. 1993. Deconstructing the Chinese Nation. Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 30: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, Jeannette, with David Shambaugh. 2005. The odyssey of China’s imperial art treasures. Seattle: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, Don. 1987. Uses of the past: Archeology in the service of the state. American Antiquity 52(2): 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladney, Dru. 2004. Dislocating China: Reflections on Muslims, minorities and other subaltern subjects. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, Stefan. 2007. Protecting China’s cultural heritage sites in times of rapid change. Asian Pacific Journal of Environment and Law 253(10): 253–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Feng. 2006. The Chinese view of nature: Tourism in China’s scenic and historic interest areas. Dissertation. Queensland: Queensland University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Henrietta. 2000. The making of the republican citizen: Political ceremonies and symbolism in China 1911–1929. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieschnick, John. 2003. The Impact of Buddhism on Chinese Material Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Rachel. 2004. “Turning Peasants into Modern Chinese Citizens: “Population Quality” Discourse, Demographic Transition, and Primary Education.” China Quarterly 177: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyiri, Pal. 2006. Scenic spots: Chinese tourism, the state, and cultural authority. Seattle: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pao, Ignatius T.P. 1966. A history of Chinese museums. Collected papers on History and Art in China. Taipei: National Historical Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassberg, Richard. 1994. Inscribed landscapes: Travel writing from imperial China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, Gray. 2005. Tibetan Buddhists in the making of modern China. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Rubie. 1995. Palaces, museums, squares: Chinese national spaces. Museum Anthropology 19(2): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Fang. 2010. China unearths tomb of country’s first known anthropologist. Xinhua News Service, January 28. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-01/28/c_13154544.htm. Accessed 26 Aug 2012.

  • Zhang Haiyang. 1997. Wrestling with the connotations of Chinese ‘Minzu’. Economic and Political Weekly, July 26, pp. 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang Min, 1989. “The Administration of China’s Archeological Heritage” in Henry Cleere (ed.) Archeological Heritage Management in the Modern World. Oxford: Unwin Hyman, 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shepherd, R.J., Yu, L. (2013). Historical Background. In: Heritage Management, Tourism, and Governance in China. SpringerBriefs in Archaeology(), vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5918-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics