Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Perceptions of Female Offenders pp 181–190Cite as

Examining the Impact of Familial Paternalism on the Sentencing Decision: Gender Leniency or Legitimate Judicial Consideration?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Nationally, the rate of incarcerated women is at an all-time high [Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2012). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage; West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice]. Even with these significant increases women defendants remain much less likely to receive sentences of incarceration than male defendants. Considering the evidence showing that women are often sentenced less harshly than men, research continues to examine the cause of gender disparities in judicial sentencing decisions. This chapter will examine the research that contends that the cause of the gender disparity may not actually be due to gender leniency but rather judicial considerations of the risks and costs of punishing female versus male defendants due to different gender roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albonetti, C. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991–1992. Law and Society Review, 31(4), 789–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. N., Cardascia, J., & Ross, C. E. (1979). Defendant’s sex and criminal court decisions. In R. Alverez & K. Lutterman (Eds.), Discrimination in organizations: Using social indicators to manage social change (pp. 329–354). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickle, G. S., & Peterson, R. D. (1991). The impact on gender-based family roles on criminal sentencing. Social Problems, 38(3), 372–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1952). Maternal care and mental health (2nd ed.). A report prepared on behalf of The World Health Organization as a contribution to the United Nations Programme for the Welfare of Homeless Children. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (1987). Seeking a national consensus. Public Welfare, 45(1), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (1995). Crime control and ethnic minorities: Legitimizing racial oppression by creating moral panics. In D. F. Hawkins (Ed.), Ethnicity, race and crime: Perspectives across time and place. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2012). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, B. K. (1991). Sex differences in criminal sentences: Chivalry or patriarchy? Justice Quarterly, 8(1), 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croyle, J. L. (1983). Measuring and explaining disparities in felony sentences: Courtroom work group factors and race, sex, and socioeconomic influences on sentence severity. Political Behavior, 5(1), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (1987a). Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law & Society Review, 21(2), 267–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (1987b). Discrimination in the criminal courts: Family, gender, and the problem of equal treatment. Social Forces, 66(1), 152–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (1989). Neither conflict for labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions. Crime and Delinquency, 35(1), 136–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, A. M. (1994). Crisis and reform: Current issues in American punishment. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, M. (1983). Mitigating circumstances: Familial rhetoric. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 11, 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. (2004). Measuring judicial and prosecutorial discretion: Sex and race disparities in departures from the federal sentencing guidelines. Justice Research and Policy, 6(2), 45–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiburger, T. L. (2007). Familial paternalism in the courtroom: A comprehensive examination of male and female criminal sentences. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Indiana Pennsylvania, 2007). Available from Proquest AAT: 32593795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiburger, T. L. (2010). The effects of gender, family status, and race on sentencing decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(3), 378–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiburger, T. L. (2011). The impact of gender, offense type, and familial role on the decision to incarcerate. Social Justice Research, 24(2), 143–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaze, L. E., & Bonzcar, T. P. (2009). Probation and parole in the United States, 2007 statistical tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., Simpson, J., & Gillis, A. R. (1979). The sexual stratification of social control. The British Journal of Sociology, 30, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R. L., Harper, G. C., & Stockdale, J. E. (2000). The role of sentencing of women in drug trafficking crime. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7(1), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koons-Witt, B. A. (2002). The effect of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40(2), 287–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruttschnitt, C. (1982). Women, crime and dependency: An application of the theory of law. Criminology, 19, 495–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruttschnitt, C., & Green, D. E. (1984). The sex-sanctioning issue: Is it history? American Sociology Review, 49, 541–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruttschnitt, C., & McCarthy, D. (1985). Familial social control and pretrial sanctions: Does sex really matter? Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C. R. (1984). Race and sentencing of female felons: A field study. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 7, 160–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumola, C. J. (2000). Incarcerated parents and their children. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, M. B., & Freiburger, T. L. (2011). Assessing the influence of familial paternalism on child neglect sentencing decisions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C. (1999). Gender and sentencing of drug offenders: Is chivalry dead? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9(3), 365–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. (2000). Is preferential treatment of felony offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11(2), 149–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., Welch, S., & Gruhl, J. (1985). Women defendants in court: The interaction between sex and race in conviction and sentencing. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2006). Ethnicity and judges’ sentencing decisions: Hispanic-black-white comparisons. Criminology, 39(1), 145–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31(3), 411–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Ulmer, J. (1995). Age differences in sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 12(3), 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 73–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S., Weisburd, D., & Bode, N. (1982). Sentencing the white-collar offender: Rhetoric and reality. American Sociological Review, 47, 641–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zingraff, M., & Thomson, R. (1984). Differential sentencing of women and men in the U.S.A. International Journal of Sociology of Law, 12, 401–413.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pennsylvania State University-Beaver, 100 University Drive, Monaca, PA, 15061, USA

    Mari B. Pierce

Authors
  1. Mari B. Pierce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mari B. Pierce .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, Franco Bldg 131, Reading, 19610, Pennsylvania, USA

    Brenda L. Russell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pierce, M.B. (2013). Examining the Impact of Familial Paternalism on the Sentencing Decision: Gender Leniency or Legitimate Judicial Consideration?. In: Russell, B. (eds) Perceptions of Female Offenders. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation