Negotiating Deportations: An Ethnography of the Legal Challenge of Deportation Orders in a French Immigration Detention Centre

An Ethnography of the Legal Challenge of Deportation Orders in a French Immigration Detention Center
Chapter
Part of the Immigrants and Minorities, Politics and Policy book series (IMPP)

Abstract

As most western countries, France has witnessed a general increase of legal control over unauthorized immigration in the past years. This crackdown on so-called undocumented foreigners resulted in a wide recourse to police round-ups, identity checks and custody, or the development of computerized files of foreign nationals designed to “secure the border” and detect unwanted immigrants on the French territory ( Weil 2005;Guiraudon 2000;Hollifield 2004). Among those measures, the deportation process has been particularly enhanced, as it provides the most direct and clear enforcement of the “social closure” separating nationals from foreigners. If deportation is, indeed, a “bordering institution”, the border that is at stake here is not merely geographic—it is as well a political, a legal, and more broadly a social one, setting those who may exercise the ordinary rights of citizens apart from those who may not (DeGenova and Peutz 2010) .

Keywords

Migration Europe Tuberculosis Assure Stake 

References

  1. Agrikoliansky, E. (2003). Usages choisis du droit: le service juridique de la ligue des droits de l’homme (1970–1990). Entre politique et raison humanitaire. Sociétés contemporaines, 52(4), 61–84.Google Scholar
  2. Agrikoliansky, E. (2005). Liberté, liberté chérie…La gauche et la protection des libertés publiques dans les années 1970. Hypothèses sur la résurgence de la notion d’Etat de droit. In L. S. I. Guillaume, A. Vauchez, L. Willemez (Eds.), Sur la portée sociale du droit usages et légitimité du registre juridique (pp. 325–339). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  3. Andreas, P., & Snyder, T. (2000). The wall around the West : State borders and immigration controls in North America and Europe. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Bigo, D. (1996). Polices en réseaux. L’expérience européenne. Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques.Google Scholar
  5. Calavita, K. (2005). Immigrants at the margins : Law, race, and exclusion in Southern Europe (Cambridge studies in law and society). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castles, S. (2004). The factors that make and unmake migration policies. International Migration Review, 38(3), 852–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coutin, S. B. (2000). Legalizing moves : Salvadoran immigrants’ struggle for U.S. residency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  8. Coutin, S. B. (2003). Suspension of deportation hearings and measures of “Americanness”. Journal of Latin American Anthropology, 8(2), 58–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Genova, N. (2002). Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Genova, N., & Peutz, N. M. (2010). The deportation regime : Sovereignty, space, and the freedom of movement. Durham N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Drahy, J. (2004). Le droit contre l’État ? droit et défense associative des étrangers, l’exemple de la CIMADE préf. de Jacques Chevallier (Logiques juridiques). Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  12. Duroy, S. (2001). Le contrôle juridictionnel des mesures relatives aux étrangers sous la Troisième République. In M.-C. Blanc-Chaléard, C. Douki, & N. Dyonnet (Eds.), Police et migrants France, 1667–1939 (p. 422). Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
  13. Ellermann, A. (2009). States against migrants : Deportation in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Engbersen, G. (2001). The unanticipated consequences of panopticon Europe: residence strategies of illegal immigrants. In V. Guiraudon, & C. Joppke (Eds.), Controlling a new migration world (pp. 222–246, Vol. 4). London, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer, N. (2013). Le territoire de l’expulsion. La rétention administrative des étrangers dans l’Etat de droit. Lyon: Presses de l’ENS Lyon.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish : The birth of the prison (1st American ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (2004). La redéfinition du judiciable. Conférence au Syndicat de la Magistrature. Vacarme, 29, 54–57.Google Scholar
  18. Garfinkel, H. (1956). Consideration of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology 61, 420–424.Google Scholar
  19. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums; essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates (1st ed., Anchor, A277). Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  20. Guiraudon, V. (2000). Les politiques d’immigration en Europe Allemagne, France, Pays-Bas (Logiques politiques). Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  21. Hagan, J. M. (1994). Deciding to be legal : A Maya community in Houston. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hamel, C., & Lemoine, D. (2000). Rendez-vous au 35 bis. L’étranger, le juge et l’ethnologue. La Tour-d’Aigues: Éd. de l’Aube.Google Scholar
  23. Heyman, J. M. (1999). States and illegal practices. Oxford, NY: Berg.Google Scholar
  24. Hollifield, J. (2004). France: republicanism and the limits of immigration control. In W. A. Cornelius, T. Tsuda, P. L. Martin, J. F. Hollifiled (Eds.), Controlling immigration. A global perspective (pp. 183–214). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Israël, L. (2009). L’ arme du droit. Paris: SciencesPo-les Presses.Google Scholar
  26. Joppke, C. (1998). Why liberal states accept unwanted immigration. World Politics, 50(2), 266–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lascoumes, P. (1990). Normes juridiques et mise en oeuvre de l’action publique. Année sociologique(40), 43–71.Google Scholar
  28. Lochak, D., & Jullien-Laferrière, F. (1990). Les expulsions entre la politique et le droit. Archives de politique criminelle (12), 65–87.Google Scholar
  29. Marin, B., & Mayntz, R. (1991). Policy networks : Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag; Westview Press.Google Scholar
  30. Nyers, P. (2003). Abject cosmopolitanism: The politics of protection in the anti-deportation movement. Third World Quarterly, 24(6), 1069–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peutz, N. M. (2006). Embarking on an anthropology of removal. Current Anthropology, 47(2), 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pratt, A. (2005). Securing borders : Detention and deportation in Canada (Law and society). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sarat, A., & Scheingold, S. A. (1998). Cause lawyering : political commitments and professional responsibilities (Oxford socio-legal studies). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schuster, L., & Welch, M. (2008). American and British constructions of asylum seekers: moral panic, detention and human rights. In D. Brotherton & P. Kretsedemas (Eds.), Keeping out the other: a critical introduction to immigration enforcement today. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. SGCICI. (2011). Les orientations de la politique d’immigration. Rapport au parlement. Paris: La documentation française.Google Scholar
  36. Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship : Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. Spire, A. (2005). Étrangers à la carte. L’administration de l’immigration en France, 1945–1975 (Collection dirigée par Patrick Weil). Paris: B. Grasset.Google Scholar
  38. Spire, A. (2008). Accueillir ou reconduire enquête sur les guichets de l’immigration. Paris: Raison d’agir éd.Google Scholar
  39. Torpey, J. (2000). The invention of the passport : Surveillance, citizenship, and the state (Cambridge studies in law and society). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Walters, W. (2002). Deportation, expulsion, and the International Police of Aliens. Citizenship Studies, 6(3), 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weil, P. (2005). La France et ses étrangers l’aventure d’une politique d’immigration de 1938 à nos jours (Nouv. éd. refondue ed., Folio Histoire). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  42. Welch, M. (2002). Detained : Immigration laws and the expanding I.N.S. jail complex. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Willen, S. S. (2007a). Toward a Critical phenomenology of « Illegality » : State power, criminalization, and abjectivity among undocumented migrant workers in tel aviv, Israel. International Migration, 45(3), 8–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Willen, S. S. (2007b). Transnational migration to Israel in global comparative context. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CESDIP Centre de Recherches Sociologiques sur le Droit et les Institutions PénalesGuyancourtFrance

Personalised recommendations