Abstract
This work was motivated by the role of real options as a risk management and an uncertainty-filtering methodology that helps minimize downside risk and maximize upside potential of a firm’s investments. Firms evolve in an uncertain and dynamic environment in which they use the “new knowledge [they] derived through the healthy balance between competition and cooperation involving employees and business partners” (strategic knowledge co-opetition, E. G. Carayannis 2009) in the definition of their real options. These real options serve as the basis for their decision making so as to reap the full benefits of the flexibility embedded in their investments. By the exercise of their options, firms have changed the parameters of their previously temporarily stable ecosystem, resulting in a now unstable environment. Having completed the co-opetition process, firms create “new knowledge through a series of interactions and changes at various levels of the organization, spurred by the co-generation and complementary nature of that knowledge,” what Carayannis (ibid) coined strategic knowledge coevolution. Through innovation, they also undergo strategic knowledge co-specialization, “learning and knowledge which encourages individuals or groups to expand their roles into new areas and new domains, in a complementary and mutually-reinforcing fashion” (ibid). Strategic knowledge co-specialization enables firms to develop sustainable entrepreneurship (E. G. Carayannis 2008), that is, “the creation of viable, profitable and scalable firms that engender the formation of self-replicating and mutually enhancing innovation networks and knowledge clusters leading towards what we call robust competitiveness.” As such, firms are enabled to develop a temporarily “unfair” competitive advantage as they develop knowledge in new areas and exploit them. In this context, firms now evolve in a temporarily stable environment, sustainable entrepreneurship (ibid), a “state of economic being and becoming that avails systematic and defensible ‘unfair advantages’ to the entities that are part of the economy and is built on mutually complementary and reinforcing low-, medium and high technology, public and private sector entities (government agencies, private firms, universities, and non-governmental organizations).”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bowman EH, Hurry D (1993) Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Acad Manage Rev 18(4):760–782
Bushy JS, Pitts CGC (1997) Real options and capital investment decisions. Manage Account-Lond 75:38–39
Carayannis EG (2008) Knowledge-driven creative destruction, or leveraging knowledge for competitive advantage Strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity as real options drivers triggered by co-opetition, co-evolution and co-specialization. Ind High Educ 22(6):343–353
Carayannis EG (2009) Firm evolution dynamics: towards sustainable entrepreneurship and robust competitiveness in the knowledge economy and society. Int J Innov Reg Dev 1(3):235–254
Provance M (2010) Tying it together: three essays on the roles of knowledge, entrepreneurial action, and institutions in the formation of new ventures. George Washington University, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sipp, C.M., Carayannis, E.G. (2013). Conclusions. In: Real Options and Strategic Technology Venturing. SpringerBriefs in Business, vol 31. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5814-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5814-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5813-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5814-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)