Advertisement

Environmental Crisis and the Production of Alternatives: Conservation Practice(s) in the Galapagos Islands

  • Wendy WolfordEmail author
  • Flora Lu
  • Gabriela Valdivia
Chapter
Part of the Social and Ecological Interactions in the Galapagos Islands book series (SESGI, volume 1)

Abstract

Recent discussions over conservation in the Galapagos Islands indicate a search for the right way to do conservation policy. When it is treated as a narrowly environmental issue, there are relatively clear dictates as to the organization of priorities and targets. As a social issue, however, conservation is not just “done”; it is experienced, negotiated, and contested such that policies intended to address the same issues inhabit and generate quite different spaces on the islands. In this chapter, we suggest that conservation in the Galapagos has changed considerably over the past three decades; this has happened less because of changing ecological conditions or scientific understandings and more because regular moments of crisis have led to ongoing efforts to reconcile different visions of human/environmental dynamics. As a result of attempts to reconcile conservation and society, conservation approaches have multiplied. There is now not just one approach to conservation on the islands but several, and together they constitute an uneven patchwork of overlapping and competing or conflicting approaches. Based upon data collection encompassing four field seasons and over 100 interviews with key informants of the archipelago, from governmental representatives and conservationists to farmers, fishermen, and other residents, we illustrate this multiplicity of conservation approaches and develop a framework for understanding environmental crises as generative spaces and moments in which new approaches, alliances, and attitudes are formed.

Keywords

Invasive Species Ecological Footprint Conservation Practice Conservation Policy Environmental Crisis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors have been working together in the Galapagos Islands since 2007 and would like to thank Steve Walsh and Carlos Mena, codirectors of the Carolina Institute for the Study of the Galapagos, for their dedication to the islands and support of the authors’ research. The authors would also like to thank Patricia Polo and Elizabeth Hennessy for research support.

References

  1. Agrawal A (2005) Environmentality: technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal A and Sawyer S (2001) Environmental Orientalisms. Cultural Critique 45:71–108Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson R, Rentería J, Simbaña W (2008) The consequences of herbivore eradication on Santiago: are we in time to prevent ecosystem degradation again? Charles Darwin Foundation, Servicio Parque Nacional GalapagosGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassett TJ, Zuéli KB (2000) Environmental discourses and the Ivorian Savanna. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90(1):67–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baviskar A (2003) States, communities and conservation: the practice of ecodevelopment in the Great Himalayan National Park. In: Saberwal VK, Rangarajan M (eds) Battles over nature: science and the politics of conservation. New Delhi, Permanent BlackGoogle Scholar
  6. Bebbington A (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 27(12):2021–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bebbington A (2000) Re-encountering development: livelihood transitions and place transformations in the Andes. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90(3):495–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bebbington A (2004) NGOs and uneven development: geographies of development intervention. Prog Hum Geogr 28(6):725–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernard HR (2006) Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 4th edn. Altamira Press, Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaikie P, Brookfield H (1987) Land degradation and society. Meuthen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Boersma PD, Vargas H, Merlen G (2005) Living laboratory in peril. Science 308:925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Braun B (1997) Buried epistemologies: the politics of nature in (post)colonial British Columbia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87(1):3–32Google Scholar
  14. Bryant R (2001) Politicized moral geographies. Debating biodiversity conservation and ancestral domain. Political Geography 19:673–705Google Scholar
  15. Chambers N, Simmons C, Wackernagel M (2000) Sharing nature’s interest: ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Cronon W (1995) The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In: Cronon W (ed) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. W. W. Norton and Co, New York, pp 69–90Google Scholar
  17. Crush J (ed) (1995) The power of development. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis M (2001) Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño famines and the making of the third world. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. de Sherbinin A, VanWey L, McSweeney K, Aggarwal R, Barbieri A, Henry S, Hunter L, Twine W, Walker R (2007) Household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Glob Environ Chang 18:38–53Google Scholar
  20. Delaney D (2005) Territory: a short introduction. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Durham W (1995) Political ecology and environmental destruction in Latin America. In: Painter M, Durham W (eds) The social causes of environmental destruction in Latin America. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 249–264Google Scholar
  22. Ellis F (1998) Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. J Dev Stud 35(1):1–38Google Scholar
  23. Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Escobar A (1995) Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  25. Fairhead J, Leach M (1996) Misreading the African landscape: society and ecology in a ­forest-savanna mosaic. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferguson J (1990) The anti-politics machine: “development”, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  27. Folke C, Pritchard L, Berkes F, Colding J, Svedin U (2007) The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecol Soc 12(1):30Google Scholar
  28. Foster JB (2000) Marx’s ecology: materialism and nature. Monthly Review Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Fox J (1998) The struggle for accountability: the World Bank, NGOs and grassroots movements. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Gardener M, Grenier C (2011) Linking livelihoods and conservation: challenges facing the Galapagos Islands. In: Baldacchino B, Niles D (eds) Island futures and development across the Asia-Pacific region, Global Environmental Studies, Springer, pp 73–85Google Scholar
  32. Gardener M, Atkinson R, Rentería JL (2010a) Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos. Restor Ecol 18(1):20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gardener MR, Cordell S, Anderson M, Tunnicliffe RD (2010b) Evaluating the long-term project to eradicate the rangeland weed Martynia annua L.: linking community with conservation. Rangel J 32:407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Geist D, Harmann O, Snell H, Whelan P (2011) Galapagos Goal: Eradication of Invasive Species. Reply to Vince (2011) “Embracing Species,” http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6023/1383/reply.AccessedOct19,2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gonzalez JA, Montes C, Rodriguez J, Tapia W (2008) Rethinking the Galapagos Islands as a Complex Socio-Ecoloigcal System: Implications for Conservation and Management. Ecology and Society 13(2):13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guyer J, Peters P (1987) Introduction to conceptualising the household: issues of theory and policy in Africa. Dev Change 18(2):197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holt FL (2005) The catch-22 of conservation: indigenous peoples, biologists and culture change. Hum Ecol 33(2):199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jokisch B, Pribilsky J (2002) The panic to leave: economic crisis and the ‘new emigration’ from Ecuador. Int Migr 40(4):75–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leopold A (1949) A Sand County almanac, and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Lu, F, Valdivia G. Wolford W. Social Dimensions of ‘Nature at Risk’ in the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador, Conservation and SocietyGoogle Scholar
  42. Macdonald T Jr (1997) Conflict in the Galapagos Islands: analysis and recommendations for management. Report for the Charles Darwin Foundation. Harvard University, Center for International Affairs, Program on Nonviolent Sanctions and Cultural Survival, Cambridge, MA, USA, p 15Google Scholar
  43. Myers JH, Savoie A, Van Randen E (1998) Eradication and pest management. Annu Rev Entomol 43:471–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neumann RP (2004) Moral and discursive geographies in the war for biodiversity in Africa. Polit Geogr 23(7):813–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ospina P (2006). Galapagos, naturaleza y sociedad: actores socialaes y conflictors ambientales en las islas Galapagos. Bibl Cien Soc 55. Universidad Andina Simon Bolivar, Quito, EcuadorGoogle Scholar
  46. Ospina P and Falconí C (eds) (2007) Galápagos: Migraciones, Economía, Cultura, Conflictos y Acuerdos Universidad Andina Simon Bolivar: QuitoGoogle Scholar
  47. Ostrom E, Nagendra H (2006) Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(51):19224–19231Google Scholar
  48. Peet R and Watts M (eds) (1996) Liberation ecologies. Environment, development, social movements. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Peet R, Robbins P, Watts M (2011) Global Political Ecology. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Pelling M (2003) Natural disasters and development in a globalizing world. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Quiroga D (2009) Crafting nature: The Galapagos and the making and unmaking of a “natural library.” Journal of Political Ecology: Case Studies in History and Society 16:123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simberloff D, Genovesi P, Pysek P, Campbell K (2011) Science 332(6028):419Google Scholar
  53. Sodikoff GM (2012) The anthropology of extinction: essays on culture and species death. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  54. Thompson EP (1971) The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century. Past and Present 50(1):76–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Turner M (1999) No space for participation: pastoralist narratives and the etiology of park-herder conflict in Southeastern Niger. Land Degrad Dev 10:345–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vince G (2011) Embracing invasives. Science 331(6023):1383–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watkins G, Cruz F (2007) Galapagos at risk: a socioeconomic analysis of the situation in the Archipelago. Charles Darwin Foundation, Puerto Ayora, Province of Galapagos, Ecuador. http://216.197.125.185/pdf/GalapagosAtRisk2007.pdf
  58. West P (2006) Conservation is our government now: the politics of ecology in Papua New Guinea. Duke University Press, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilkinson S, Naeth M, Schmiegelow F (2005) Tropical forest restoration within Galapagos National Park: application of a state-transition model. Ecology and Society 10(1): 28. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art28/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Development SociologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental StudiesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeographyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations