Research in Agricultural and Urban Areas in Galapagos: A Biological Perspective

  • Stella de la TorreEmail author
Part of the Social and Ecological Interactions in the Galapagos Islands book series (SESGI, volume 1)


Agricultural and urban areas in the Galapagos Islands represent only about 3 % of the terrestrial environments, but their relevance for the conservation of the islands is unquestionable, since they are the epicenter of human activities that affect natural ecosystems. The different human activities carried out in these areas have created a matrix of environmental changes that need to be understood to improve the management of protected areas in Galapagos and elsewhere. In this chapter, some preliminary data from my current study in San Cristobal are examined to evaluate the effects of land use and climate change on nutrient dynamics, plant productivity, and diversity of animal communities, focusing on soil macroinvertebrates and terrestrial birds. In August 2011 and January 2012, soil and leaf samples were collected from 14 1 m2 plots randomly selected in four sites that differ in their land use patterns: urban, organic agriculture, pasture and guava, and restoration with native plant species. These samples were analyzed to assess their nitrogen and carbon contents. In addition, the percentage of vegetation cover was estimated as a proxy for primary productivity and the diversity of soil macroinvertebrates in the plots. These data were complemented with bird censuses at three observation points in each site. Significant differences were found in all but one of the studied ecological variables among sites. Although preliminary, these results suggest that land use patterns have considerable effects on the structure and function of terrestrial ecosystems in the Galapagos. There is some evidence that pasture, in combination with guava, affect nutrient availability and that, at least in the rainy season, vegetation cover and macroinvertebrate diversity are partially and negatively related to the C/N ratio in soil. To my knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the effects of land use and climate on nutrient dynamics and community diversity in agricultural and urban systems in the Galapagos. Evidently, more data and analyses are needed to better understand the direction and extent of the impact of land use changes on island ecosystems. Similar analyses need to be carried out in protected areas with native vegetation at different altitudes and ecosystems, to be used as control sites. Further analyses should also include chrono-sequences of the studied variables in disturbed and restored areas of different ages, to have an insight into ecosystems’ resilience and the impact of current climate change. These preliminary findings and future research ideas may trigger more research on the impact of human activities on terrestrial ecosystems in the Galapagos.


Vegetation Cover Urban Site Shannon Diversity Index Climatic Season Restoration Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research was funded by a grant from GAIAS—Universidad San Francisco de Quito. A research permit (PC-30-11) was granted by the Galapagos National Park that allowed this research to be conducted. I deeply acknowledge Isabel Villarruel for her outstanding assistance in the fieldwork and data analyses; Pablo Yépez for his support in all the stages of the study; Aaron Moody for his valuable comments on this manuscript; and Carlos Mena and Steve Walsh of the Galapagos Science Center (USFQ/UNC) for their valuable support during the fieldwork and for inviting me to participate in this book. Geovanny Sarigu from Hacienda La Tranquila and Nicolás Balón and Edgar Román from Hacienda El Cafetal kindly allowed me to carry out the field research in those areas and constantly supported our fieldwork. My special thanks to Sofía Tacle, Leandro Vaca, Courtney Butnor, Cecibel Narváez, María Angélica Moreano, Máximo and Marlene Ochoa, and all the personnel from GAIAS and the Galapagos Science Center for their support in the field.


  1. Abott I, Abbot LK, Grant PR (1977) Comparative ecology of Galapagos ground finches (Geospiza Gould): evaluation of the importance of floristic diversity and interspecific competition. Ecol Monogr 47:151–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Sánchez J (2001) Descomposición y ciclos de nutrientes en ecosistemas terrestres de México. Acta Zoológ Mexic 1:11–27Google Scholar
  3. Aronson EL, McNulty SG (2009) Appropriate experimental ecosystem warming methods by ecosystem, objective, and practicality. Agr Forest Meteorol 149:1791–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asner GP, Townsend AR, Bustamante MM, Nardoto GB, Olander LP (2004) Pasture degradation in the central Amazon: linking changes in carbon and nutrient cycling with remote sensing. Glob Chang Biol 10:844–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer IE, Apps MJ, Bhatti JS, Lal R (2006) Climate change and terrestrial ecosystem management: knowledge gaps and research needs. In: Bhatti JS, Lal R, Apps MJ, Price MA (eds) Climate change and managed ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  6. Caujapé-Castells J, Tye A, Crawford DJ, Santos-Guerra A, Sakai A, Beaver K, Lobin W, VincentFlorens FB, Moura M, Jardim R, Gómes I, Kueffer C (2010) Conservation of oceanic island floras: present and future global challenges. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Systemat 12:107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ECOLAP, MAE (2007) Guía del Patrimonio de Áreas Naturales Protegidas del Ecuador. Ecofund, FAN, DarwinNet, IGM, QuitoGoogle Scholar
  8. Galloway JN, Aber JD, Willem Erisman J, Seitzinger SP, Howarth RW, Cowling EB, Cosby J (2003) The nitrogen cascade. Bioscience 53:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hollister RD, Webbert PJ, Nelson FE, Tweedie CE (2006) Soil thaw and temperature response to air warming varies by plant community: results from an open-top chamber experiment in Northern Alaska. Artic Antarct Alpine Res 38:206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Bruce J, Lee H, Callender BA, Haites E, Harris N, Maskell K (eds) (1995). Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. INEC (2010) Resultados censo de población 2010. (accessed 14 June 2012).
  12. Itow S (2003) Zonation pattern, succession process and invasion by aliens in species-poor insular vegetation of the Galapagos Islands. Glob Environ Res 7:39–57Google Scholar
  13. McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Martino D (2001) Buffer zones around protected areas: a brief literature review. Electron Green J. 1:15. (accessed 11 Oct 2010).
  15. Ordoñez JC (2010) Environmental filtering vs. natural variation and plant strategies: key components of plant trait modulation by nutrient supply. Thesis 2010–01 of the Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Parque Nacional Galapagos (2009) Galapagos, cincuenta años de ciencia y conservación. De Roy T (ed) Imprenta Mariscal, Quito.
  17. Pellens R, Garay I (1999) Edaphic macroarthropod communities in fast-growing plantations of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maid (Myrtaceae) and Acacia mangium Wild (Leguminosae) in Brazil. Eur J Soil Biol 35:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prins H, Wind J (1993) Research for nature conservation in south-east Asia. Biol Conserv 63:43–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robinson G, del Pino EM (1985) El Niño en las islas Galapagos, el evento de 1982–1983. Fundación Charles Darwin, QuitoGoogle Scholar
  20. SEST 840080 meteorological stationóbal_Galapagos/08-2011/840080.htm (accessed 23 Apr 2012)
  21. Schlesinger WH (1991) Biogeochemistry, an analysis of global change. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith RL, Smith TH (2000) Elements of ecology, 4th edn. Addison Wesley Longman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  23. Trueman M, d’Ozouville N (2010) Characterizing the Galapagos terrestrial climate in the face of global climate change. Galapagos Res 67:26–37Google Scholar
  24. Van Arendonk JCM, Niemann GJ, Boon JJ, Lambers H (1997) Effects of nitrogen supply on the anatomy and chemical composition of leaves of four grass species belonging to the genus Poa, as determined by image-processing analysis and pyrolysis mass spectrometry. Plant Cell Environ 20:881–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversidad San Francisco de QuitoQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations