Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Linear Accounts of Vulnerability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community Disaster Vulnerability

  • 2013 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter takes a closer look at the kinds of relationships found in vulnerability theory and deepens our discussion of the linear statistical models used in developing and testing aspects of vulnerability theory. The developmental state of a theory is reflected in its relationships. Vulnerability theory is at an embryonic stage with most of its relationships having been established through linear statistical models. Vulnerability theory offers social work researchers a solid foundation in need of refinement, extension, and further testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arlikatti, S., Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Risk area accuracy and hurricane evacuation expectations of coastal residents. Environment and Behavior, 38(2), 226–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, M. M., & Gillespie, D. F. (1994). Linking preparedness and organizational disaster response effectiveness. Journal of Community Practice, 1(3), 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankoff, G. (2004). The historical geography of disaster: “Vulnerability” and “local knowledge. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks, & D. Hilhorst (Eds.), Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development & people (pp. 25–36). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankoff, G., Frerks, G., & Hilhorst, D. (2004). Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development, & people. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. H. (1969). Communities in disaster. A sociological analysis of collective stress situations. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. H. (2005). Disaster and collective stress. In R. W. Perry & E. L. Quarantelli (Eds.), What is a disaster? New answers to old questions (pp. 125–152). Bloomington: Xlibris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benight, C. C., Ironson, G., & Durham, R. L. (1999). Psychometric properties of a hurricane coping self-efficacy measure. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 12(2), 379–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benight, C. C., McFarlane, A. C., & Norris, F. H. (2006). Formulating questions about postdisaster mental health. In F. H. Norris, S. Galea, M. J. Friedman, & P. J. Watson (Eds.), Methods for disaster mental health research (pp. 62–77). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielefeld, W., Murdoch, J. C., & Waddell, P. (1997). The influence of demographics and distance on nonprofit location. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2), 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., & Brookfield, H. (1987). Land degradation and society. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, M. P., Cameron, J., & Seddon, J. D. (1979). The struggle for basic needs in Nepal. Paris: Development Centre Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., Cameron, J., & Seddon, D. (1980). Nepal in crisis: Growth and stagnation at the periphery. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M. (1964). Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M. (1969). Theory construction. From verbal to mathematical formulations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R. C. (2007). Race, class, ethnicity, and disaster vulnerability. In H. Rodriguez, E. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 113–129). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). The three C’s in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16(3), 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., Galea, S., Bucciarelli, A., & Vlahov, D. (2007). What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(5), 671–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., & Gupta, S. (2009). Resilience after disaster. In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F. H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 145–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, K. A., Schmidtlein, M. C., Emrich, C. T., Piegorsch, W. W., & Cutter, S. L. (2007). Vulnerability of U.S. cities to environmental hazards. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 4(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottero, W. (2007). Social inequality and interaction. Sociology Compass, 1(2), 814–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourque, L. B., Siegel, J. M., Kano, M., & Wood, M. M. (2006). Weathering the storm: The impact of hurricanes on physical and mental health. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604, 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brave Heart, M. Y. H. (2000). Wakiksuyapi: Carrying the historical trauma of the Lakota. In M. J. Zakour (Ed.), Disaster and traumatic stress research and intervention. Tulane studies in social welfare (Vol. 21–22, pp. 245–266). New Orleans: Tulane University, School of Social Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnside, R., Miller, D. S., & Rivera, J. D. (2007). The impact of information and risk perception on the hurricane evacuation decision-making of greater New Orleans residents. Sociological Spectrum, 27, 727–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, O. D. (2004). The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: A necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks, & D. Hilhorst (Eds.), Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development & people (pp. 37–51). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, J., Tobin, G. A., & Montz, B. E. (2005). Population evacuation: Assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Natural Hazards Review, 6(1), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., & Gillespie, D. F. (2006). A conceptual model exploring the dynamics of government-nonprofit service delivery. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 55(3), 493–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, T. W. (2008a). What influences mitigation? Household decision making about wildfire risks in Arizona’s White Mountains. The Professional Geographer, 60(4), 508–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, T. W. (2008b). The political ecology of hazard vulnerability: Marginalization, facilitation and the production of differential risk to urban wildfires in Arizona’s White Mountains. Journal of Political Ecology, 15, 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, J. M., & Schuman, H. (1974). Conversations at random: Survey research as interviewers see it. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. L., & Rohleder, T. R. (2006). Learning from incidents: From normal accidents to high reliability. System Dynamics Review, 22(3), 213–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuny, F. C. (1983). Disasters and development. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L. (2006). Hazards, vulnerability, and environmental justice. Sterling: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability of environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 242–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., & Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vaus, D. (2001). Research design in social research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, M. A. (2006). Defining the policy space for disaster management: A system dynamics approach to U.S. flood policy analysis. Paper presented at the 24th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, B., & Lyon, M. (1998). Risk and resilience: Implications for the delivery of educational and mental health services in schools. School Psychology Review, 27, 348–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T. E. (1986). Human system response to disaster. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T. E., & McEntire, D. A. (2002). Emergent phenomena and multiorganizational coordination in disasters: Lessons from the research literature. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 20(2), 197–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples. The American Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C. L. (1999). The phoenix effect in post-disaster recovery: An analysis of the Economic Development Administration’s culture of response after Hurricane Andrew. In A. Oliver-Smith & S. M. Hoffman (Eds.), The angry earth: Disaster in anthropological perspective (pp. 278–300). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enarson, E., Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. (2007). Gender and disaster: Foundations and directions. In H. Rodriguez, E. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 130–145). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, K. (1994). A new species of trouble. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, M. (1999). The intersection of gender and social class in disaster: Balancing resilience and vulnerability. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 17(1), 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1968). Principles of systems. Portland: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. A. (1992). As others see us: A case study in path analysis. In J. P. Shaffer (Ed.), The role of nonexperimental social science: Two debates (pp. 3–30). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association and American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabe, T., Falk, G., McCarty, M., & Mason, V. W. (2005, November 4). Hurricane Katrina: Social-demographic characteristics of impacted areas (RL33141). U.S. Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galea, S., & Maxwell, A. R. (2009). Methodological challenges in studying the mental health consequences of disasters. In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F. H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 579–593). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galea, S., & Norris, F. H. (2006). Public mental health surveillance and monitoring. In F. H. Norris, S. Galea, M. J. Friedman, & P. J. Watson (Eds.), Methods for disaster mental health research (pp. 177–193). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. F. (2008a). Disasters. Encyclopedia of social work (20th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxford-naswsocialwork.com/entry?entry=t203.e107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. F. (2008b). Theories of vulnerability: Key to reducing losses from disasters. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference of social work. Social work and human welfare in a changeable community (pp. 15–26). Cairo, Egypt: Helwan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. F., Colignon, R. A., Banerjee, M. M., Murty, S. A., & Rogge, M. (1993). Partnerships for community preparedness (Program on Environment and Behavior Monograph No. 54). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. F., & Murty, S. A. (1994). Cracks in a post-disaster service delivery network. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(5), 639–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. F., & Perron, B. (2007). Structural equation modeling. Encyclopedia of epidemiology (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. F., Perry, R. W., & Mileti, D. S. (1974). Collective stress and community transformation. Human Relations, 27(8), 767–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. F., Robards, K. J., & Cho, S. (2004, May). Designing safe systems: Using system dynamics to understand disasters. Natural Hazards Review, 5, 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. F., & Streeter, C. L. (1994). Fitting regression models to research questions for analyzing change in non-experimental research. Social Work Research, 18(4), 344–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, C., & Peacock, W. G. (1997). Ethnicity and segregation: Post-hurricane relocation. In W. G. Peacock, B. H. Morrow, & H. Gladwin (Eds.), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters (pp. 191–205). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girot, P. O. (2012). Plant disease, pests, and erosion of biodiversity. In B. Wisner, J. C. Gaillard, & I. Kelman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction (pp. 447–457). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, C. H., Gladwin, H., & Peacock, W. G. (2001). Modeling hurricane evacuation decisions with ethnographic methods. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 19(2), 117–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. R. (Ed.). (2002). Resiliency: An integrated approach to practice, policy, and research. Washington, DC: NASW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. R., & Greene, D. G. (2009). Resilience in the face of disasters: Bridging micro- and macro-perspectives. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19, 1010–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, G. J., & Morrow, B. H. (1997). Before the storm: The socio-political ecology of Miami. In W. G. Peacock, B. H. Morrow, & H. Gladwin (Eds.), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters (pp. 36–51). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A. O., Zinzow, H. M., Amstadter, A. B., Danielson, C. K., & Ruggiero, K. J. (2009). Factors associated with exposure and response to disasters among marginalized populations. In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F. H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 277–290). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D. (2007). Anthropological contributions to the study of disasters. In D. McEntire (Ed.), Disciplines, disasters, and emergency management: The convergence and divergence of concepts, issues and trends from the research literature (pp. 111–123). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. (1983). Interpretations of calamity. Boston: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S. M., & Oliver-Smith, A. (Eds.). (2002). Catastrophe & culture. The anthropology of disaster. Santa Fe: School of American Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, J. S., Beggs, J. J., & Haines, V. A. (2001). Social networks and social capital in extreme environments. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 209–231). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, J. S., Haines, V. A., & Beggs, J. J. (2000). Core networks and tie activation: What kinds of routine networks allocate resources in nonroutine situation? American Sociological Review, 65(4), 598–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007, November). Summary for policymakers of the synthesis report of the IPCC fourth assessment report. Retrieved November 18, 2007, from http://www.ipcc.ch/IPCC Nov17 ar4_syr_spm.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. (2008). World disasters report 2008. Retrieved March 14, 2009, from www.redcross.ie/layout/set/print/content/view/full/1831Red_Cross_Red_Crescent_figures_HIV_disasters.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. H. (2009). Distinctions that matter: Received social support, perceived social support, and social embeddedness after disasters. In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F. H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 175–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu, N., Augustin, M.-E., & Garayev, V. (2009). Interstate partnerships in emergency management: Emergency management assistance compact in response to catastrophic disasters. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendra, J. M., & Wachtendorf, T. (2007). Community innovation and disasters. In H. Rodriguez, E. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 316–334). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinenberg, E. (2002). ‪Heat wave‬: ‪a social autopsy of disaster in Chicago‬. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analysis (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series No. 28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd ed.) (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 154). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. K. O., Shen, C., & Tran, T. V. (2009). Coping with Hurricane Katrina: Psychological distress and resilience among African American evacuees. Journal of Black Psychology, 35(1), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001). Building a network theory of social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3–29). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N., Cook, K., & Burt, R. S. (Eds.). (2001). Social capital: Theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., Lu, J.-C., & Prater, C. S. (2005). Household decision making and evacuation in response to Hurricane Lili. Natural Hazards Review, 6(4), 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S. (2007). Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation time estimate analysis for private vehicles: Examples from hurricane research and planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 133(1), 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S., Sanderson, W. G., Jr., Lee, H. M., Yang, Z., Mohite, A., & Hwang, S. N. (2001). Texas Gulf Coast residents’ expectations and intentions regarding hurricane evacuation. College Station: Texas A&M Univ. Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, A., & Wisner, B. (2012). Politics: Power and disasters. In Wisner, J. C. Gaillard, & I. Kelman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction (pp. 48–59). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. (1989). Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A. (1998). Feedback from the field: Pendulum policies and the need for relief and invulnerable development. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 16(2), 212–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A. (2002). Coordinating multi-organizational responses to disaster: Lessons from the March 28, 2000, Fort Worth Tornado. Disaster Prevention and Management, 11(5), 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A. (2004a). Development, disasters and vulnerability: A discussion of divergent theories and the need for their integration. Disaster Prevention and Management, 13(3), 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A. (2004, June 8). The status of emergency management theory: Issues, barriers, and recommendations for improved scholarship. Paper submitted at the FEMA Higher Education Conference, Emmitsburg, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A. (2005). Why vulnerability matters: Exploring the merit of an inclusive disaster reduction concept. Disaster Prevention and Management, 14(2), 206–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A. (Ed.). (2007a). Disciplines, disasters, and emergency management: The convergence and divergence of concepts, issues and trends from the research literature. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A. (2007b). The importance of multi- and interdisciplinary research on disasters and for emergency management. In D. McEntire (Ed.), Disciplines, disasters, and emergency management: The convergence and divergence of concepts, issues and trends from the research literature (pp. 3–14). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A. (2008). A critique of emergency management policy: Recommendations to reduce disaster vulnerability. International Journal of Public Policy, 3(5/6), 302–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A. (2009). Revolutionary and evolutionary change in emergency management. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 4(1), 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A., Fuller, C., Johnston, C. W., & Weber, R. (2002). A comparison of disaster paradigms: The search for a holistic policy guide. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. A., & Mathis, S. (2007). Comparative politics and disasters: Assessing substantive and methodological contributions. In D. McEntire (Ed.), Disciplines, disasters, and emergency management: The convergence and divergence of concepts, issues and trends from the research literature (pp. 178–188). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, A. C., & Norris, F. H. (2006). Definitions and concepts in disaster research. In F. H. Norris, S. Galea, M. J. Friedman, & P. J. Watson (Eds.), Methods for disaster mental health research (pp. 3–19). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, L. C., Ford, E. S., & Okoro, C. A. (2007). Natural disasters and older US adults with disabilities: Implications for evacuation. Disasters, 31(1), 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. (1997). Treating post-traumatic stress disorder: A handbook and practice manual for therapy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. (1962). Political parties. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti, D. S. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: John Henry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minahan, A., & Pincus, A. (1977). Conceptual framework for social work practice. Journal for the National Association of Social Workers, 22(5), 347–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. T., Thomas, D. S. K., & Cutter, S. L. (1999). Dumping in Dixie revisited: The evolution of environmental injustices in South Carolina. Social Sciences Quarterly, 80(2), 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montz, B. E., & Tobin, G. A. (2005). Snowbirds and senior living developments: An analysis of vulnerability associated with Hurricane Charley. Boulder: Univ. of Colorado Natural Hazards Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interactions. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, B. H., & Peacock, W. G. (1997). Disasters and social change: Hurricane Andrew and the reshaping of Miami? In W. G. Peacock, B. H. Morrow, & H. Gladwin (Eds.), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters (pp. 226–242). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murty, S. A., & Gillespie, D. F. (1995). Introducing network analysis into the social work curriculum. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 19(2), 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neria, Y., Galea, S., & Norris, F. H. (2009). Disaster mental health research: Current state, gapes in knowledge, and future directions. In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F. H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 594–610). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederhoffer, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2009). Sharing one’s story: On the benefits of writing or talking about emotional experience. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 621–632). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H. (2006). Disaster research methods: Past progress and future directions. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(2), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., Baker, C. B., Murphy, A. D., & Kaniasty, K. (2005). Social support mobilization and deterioration after Mexico’s 1999 flood: Effects of context, gender, and time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1/2), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., & Elrod, C. L. (2006). Psychosocial consequences of disaster: A review of past research. In F. H. Norris, S. Galea, M. J. Friedman, & P. J. Watson (Eds.), Methods for disaster mental health research (pp. 20–42). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., & Watson, P. J. (2002a). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part II. Summary and implications of the disaster mental health research. Psychiatry, 65(3), 240–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., Watson, P. J., Byrne, C. M., Diaz, E., & Kaniasty, K. (2002b). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981–2001. Psychiatry, 65(3), 207–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., Galea, S., Friedman, M. J., & Watson, P. J. (Eds.). (2006). Methods for disaster mental health research. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., & Kaniasty, K. (1996). Received and perceived social support in times of stress: A test of the social support deterioration deterrence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 498–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., Murphy, A. D., Kaniasty, K., Perilla, J. L., & Ortis, D. C. (2001). Postdisaster social support in the United States and Mexico: Conceptual and contextual considerations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 23(4), 469–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1/2), 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., Tracy, M., & Galea, S. (2009). Looking for resilience: Understanding the longitudinal trajectories of responses to stress. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 2190–2198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., & Wind, L. H. (2009). The experience of disaster: Trauma, loss, adversities, and community effects. In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F. H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 29–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, C. S., Hong, B. A., Suris, A., & Spitznagal, E. (2008). Distinguishing distress and psychopathology among survivors of the Oakland/Berkeley Firestorm. Psychiatry, 71(1), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, C. S., & Norris, F. H. (2006). Choosing research methods to match research goals in studies of disaster or terrorism. In F. H. Norris, S. Galea, M. J. Friedman, & P. J. Watson (Eds.), Mental health research (pp. 45–61). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, P., Westgate, K., & Wisner, B. (1976, April 15). Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 260, 566–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (1996). Anthropological research on hazards and disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 303–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (2002). Theorizing disasters: Nature, power, and culture. In S. M. Hoffman & A. Oliver-Smith (Eds.), Catastrophe & culture: The anthropology of disaster (pp. 23–47). Santa Fe: School of American Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (2004). Theorizing vulnerability in a globalized world: A political ecological perspective. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks, & D. Hilhorst (Eds.), Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development & people (pp. 10–24). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith, A., & Button, G. (2005). Forced migration as an index of vulnerability in Hurricane Katrina. Paper presented at the UNU-EHS Expert Working Group II, Measuring the Un-measurable, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, W. G., & Girard, C. (1997). Ethnic and racial inequalities in hurricane damage and insurance settlements. In W. G. Peacock, B. H. Morrow, & H. Gladwin (Eds.), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters (pp. 171–190). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, W. G., Morrow, B. H., & Gladwin, H. (1997). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, W. G., & Ragsdale, A. K. (1997). Social systems, ecological networks and disasters: Toward a socio-political ecology of disasters. In W. G. Peacock, B. H. Morrow, & H. Gladwin (Eds.), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters (pp. 20–35). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedrotti, J. T., Edwards, L. M., & Lopez, S. J. (2009). Positive psychology within a cultural context. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 49–57). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulwarty, R. S., Broad, K., & Finan, T. (2004). El Niño events, forecasts and decision-making. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks, & D. Hilhorst (Eds.), Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development & people (pp. 83–98). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Shuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L. (2005). A social science research agenda for the disasters of the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological and empirical issues and their professional implementation. In R. W. Perry & E. L. Quarantelli (Eds.), What is a disaster? New answers to old questions (pp. 325–396). Bloomington: Xlibris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiro-Tajalli, I., & Campbell, C. (2002). Resilience and violence at the macro level. In R. R. Greene (Ed.), Resiliency: An integrated approach to practice, policy, and research (pp. 217–240). Washington, DC: NASW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, S. R. (2002). Missing expertise, categorical politics, and chronic disasters: The case of Bhopal. In S. M. Hoffman & A. Oliver-Smith (Eds.), Catastrophe & culture: The anthropology of disaster (pp. 237–259). Santa Fe: School of American Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, B., Cieslak, R., & Waldrep, E. (2009). Social and cognitive frameworks for understanding the mental health consequences of disasters. In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F. H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 161–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, B., & Maguire, P. (2009). Disaster mental health research: Past, present, and future. In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F. H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and disasters (pp. 7–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, D. E. (2009). In the margins of contamination: Lead poisoning and the production of neoliberal nature in Uruguay. Journal of Political Ecology, 16, 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, D. E. (2012). New hazards and old disease: Lead contamination and the Uruguayan battery industry. In C. Sellers & J. Melling (Eds.), Dangerous trade: Histories of industrial hazard across a globalizing world (pp. 99–111). Philadelphia: Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riad, J. K., Norris, F. H., & Ruback, R. B. (1999). Predicting evacuation in two major disasters: Risk perception, social influence, and access to resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 918–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. P. (1991). Feedback thought in social science and systems theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, B. (2004). An introduction to systems thinking. Lebanon: ISEE Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogge, M. E. (1996). Social vulnerability to toxic risk. In C. L. Streeter & S. A. Murty (Eds.), Research on social work and disasters (pp. 109–129). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogge, M. E. (1998). Toxic risk, community resilience, and social justice in Chattanooga, Tennessee. In M. D. Hoff (Ed.), Sustainable community development: Studies in economic, environmental, and cultural revitalization (pp. 105–121). Boston: Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronan, K. R., & Johnston, D. M. (2001). Correlates of hazard education programs for youth. Risk Analysis, 21(6), 1055–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronan, K. R., & Johnston, D. M. (2005). Promoting community resilience in disasters: The role for schools, youth, and families. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1968). The logic of survey analysis. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, L. B., Caye, J. C., Ayalon, O., & Lahad, M. (2005). When their world falls apart: Helping families and children manage the effects of disasters. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, J. W., & Repenning, N. P. (2002). Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüstemli, A., & Karanci, A. N. (1999). Correlates of earthquake cognitions and preparedness behavior in a victimized population. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(1), 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, S., Bowie, S. L., & Bowie, Y. D. (2003). Lessons learned on forced relocation of older adults: The impact of Hurricane Andrew on health, mental health, and social support of public housing residents. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 40(4), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutt, R. K. (2005). Sampling. In R. M. Grinnell Jr. & Y. A. Unrau (Eds.), Social work research and evaluation (7th ed., pp. 150–169). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherraden, M. S., & Fox, E. (1997). The Great Flood of 1993: Response and recovery in five communities. The Journal of Community Practice, 4(3), 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic, S. P., & Ahmad, S. (2005). Computer-based model for flood evacuation emergency planning. Natural Hazards, 34, 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliman, H. H. (1996). Community responses to chronic technological disaster: The case of the Pigeon River. In C. L. Streeter & S. A. Murty (Eds.), Research on social work and disasters (pp. 89–107). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliman, H. H., & Rogge, M. E. (2002). Ethical considerations in disaster services: A social work perspective. Electronic Journal of Social Work, 1(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, C. L. (1991). Disasters and development: Disaster preparedness and mitigation as an essential component of development planning. Social Development Issues, 13(3), 100–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, C. L., & Gillespie, D. F. (1992). Social network analysis. Journal of Social Service Research, 16(1/2), 201–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundet, P. A., & Mermelstein, J. (2000). Sustainability of rural communities: Lessons from natural disaster. In M. J. Zakour (Ed.), Disaster and traumatic stress research and intervention (Vol. 21–22). New Orleans: Tulane University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttaumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. D., & Soliman, H. H. (2002). Preventable tragedies: Heat disaster and the elderly. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 38(4), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K. J. (2007). Business and disasters: Vulnerability, impact, and recovery. In H. Rodriguez, E. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 275–296). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, J. B. (1996). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnik & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed., pp. 709–811). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2009). 2008 disasters in numbers. Retrieved on March 14, 2009 from www.unisdr.org/eng/media-room/facts-sheets/2008-disasters-in-numbers-ISDR-CRE.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. F. C. (1956a). Revitalization movements. American Anthropologist, 58(2), 264–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. F. C. (1956b). Mazeway disintegration: The individual’s perception of socio-cultural disorganization. Human Organization, 16(2), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. F. C. (1956c). Mazeway resynthesis: A biocultural theory of religious inspiration. In R. S. Grumet (Ed.), Revitalizations & mazeways: Essays on culture change (Vol. 1). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, D. P., & Lininger, C. A. (1975). The sample survey: Theory and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., & Frank, K. A. (2001). Network capital in a multilevel world: Getting support from personal communities. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 233–273). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijkman, A., & Timerlake, L. (1984). Natural disaster: Act of god or acts of man? London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk. Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1960). Path coefficients and path regressions: Alternative or complementary concepts? Biometrics, 16(1), 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J. (1996). Geographic and social distance during emergencies: A path model of interorganizational links. Social Work Research, 20(1), 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J. (2007). Social work and disasters. In D. A. McEntire (Ed.), Disciplines, disasters and emergency management. The convergence and divergence of concepts, issues, and trends from the research literature (pp. 124–141). Springfield: C.C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J. (2008a). Social capital and increased organizational capacity for evacuation in natural disasters. Social Development Issues, 30(1), 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J. (2008b). Vulnerability to climate change in the Nile delta: Social policy and community development interventions. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference of social work. Social work and human welfare in a changeable community (pp. 425–451). Cairo, Egypt: Helwan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J. (2010). Vulnerability and risk assessment: Building community resilience. In D. F. Gillespie & K. Danso (Eds.), Disaster concepts and issues: A guide for social work education and practice (pp. 15–60). Alexandria: Council on Social Work Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J. (2012a). Coping with loss and overcoming trauma. In J. Framingham & M. Teasly (Eds.), Behavioral health response to disasters (pp. 95–113). New York: CRC/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J. (2012b). Natural and man-made disasters. In L. M. Healy & R. J. Link (Eds.), Handbook of international social work: Human rights, development, and the global profession (pp. 226–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J., & Gillespie, D. F. (1998). Effects of organizational type and localism on volunteerism and resource sharing during disasters. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(1), 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J., & Gillespie, D. F. (2010). Recent trends in disaster vulnerability and resiliency research: Theory, design, and methodology. In D. F. Gillespie & K. Danso (Eds.), Disaster concepts and issues: A guide for social work education and practice (pp. 35–60). Alexandria: CSWE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J., Gillespie, D. F., Sherraden, M. S., & Streeter, C. L. (1991). Volunteer organizations in disasters. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 9(2), 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakour, M. J., & Harrell, E. B. (2003). Access to disaster services: Social work interventions for vulnerable populations. Journal of Social Service Research, 30(2), 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Prater, C. S., & Lindell, M. K. (2004). Risk area accuracy and evacuation from Hurricane Bret. Natural Hazards Review, 5(3), 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA

    Michael J. Zakour

  2. Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA

    David F. Gillespie

Authors
  1. Michael J. Zakour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David F. Gillespie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zakour, M.J., Gillespie, D.F. (2013). Linear Accounts of Vulnerability. In: Community Disaster Vulnerability. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5737-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation