Abstract
In 2010, I undertook a study of a random sample of 20 counseling and psychotherapy textbooks to identify the most common errors and confusions made by the authors of these textbooks regarding the ABCs of REBT. I found a total of 240 errors and confusions, the majority arising from incorrect beliefs at B, particularly about irrational beliefs. A variety of errors and confusions were also made about (1) the relationship between B and C (including whether or not such a relationship is causal), (2) the relationship between irrational beliefs and disturbed responses at C, (3) A, and (4) emotional Cs. Twenty errors were even made about the name of the therapy!
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Epictetus, who is often cited by REBT theorists, claimed that people are disturbed not by things but by their views of things. The REBT version of this is “People are disturbed not by things; rather they disturb themselves by the irrational beliefs that they hold about things.”
- 2.
While catastrophizing is the old-fashioned term for the irrational belief known as “awfulizing,” its pairing with “self-talk” here may be confusing for the reader.
- 3.
It is the words “thinking” and “thoughts” that are the problem here, not the word “irrational.” They are too imprecise.
- 4.
It is the word “statements” here that is again the problem, not the word “irrational.” It is too imprecise.
- 5.
The inclusion of the words “must” and “awful” here do not indicate the presence of an irrational belief. The meaning seems to be that the person thinks that the essay is very bad.
- 6.
Again the presence of the word “must” does not indicate the presence of an irrational belief. The person appears to have a strong conviction that his inference that his boss is out to get him is correct.
- 7.
Since REBT is mainly concerned with irrational beliefs, readers could easily infer that these hot cognitions are, in fact, irrational beliefs.
- 8.
This is more typical of Beck’s cognitive therapy (Wills 2009).
- 9.
I have inserted numbers in this quote to aid comprehension.
- 10.
This is the first irrational belief.
- 11.
This is the second irrational belief.
- 12.
See p. 43 for the difference between awfulizing and catastrophizing.
- 13.
“I just can’t stand it” is the discomfort intolerance belief in this example.
- 14.
In this section, I will discuss this issue with respect to partial and full self-acceptance beliefs. The same points are relevant to partial and full other-acceptance and life-acceptance beliefs.
- 15.
i to iv inserted by me to aid clarity.
References
Dryden, W., Hurton, N., Malki, D., Manias, P., & Williams, K. (2008). Patients’ initial doubts, reservations and objections to the ABC’s of REBT and their application. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 26(2), 63–88.
*Archer, J. Jr., & McCarthy, C. J. (2007). Theories of counseling and psychotherapy: Contemporary applications. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Dryden, W. (2006b). Getting started with REBT: A concise guide for clients. Hove: Routledge.
Dryden, W. (2009). Rational emotive behaviour therapy: Distinctive features. Hove: Routledge.
Dryden, W. (2010). Strange, but rational. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
Dryden, W., & Branch, R. (2008). The fundamentals of rational emotive behaviour therapy: A training handbook (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
Ellis, A. (1958). Rational psychotherapy. Journal of General Psychology, 59, 35–49.
Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Birch Lane Press. Revised and updated edition.
Ellis, A. (2005). The myth of self-esteem. Amherst: Prometheus.
Ellis, A., & Dryden, W. (1997). The practice of rational emotive behavior therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Ellis, A., & MacClaren, C. (1998). Rational emotive behavior therapy: A therapist’s guide. Atascadero: Impact.
*Fall, K. A., Holden, J. M., & Marquis, A. (2004). Theoretical models of counseling and psychotherapy. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
*Ford, D. H., & Urban, H. B. (1998). Contemporary models of psychotherapy: A comparative Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Gilmore, I. (1985). Suggested revisions of some of the terminology employed in rational-emotive therapy. British Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 3(2), 93–97.
*Gladding, S. T. (2005). Counseling theories: Essential concepts and applications. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
*Hough, M. (2002). A practical approach to counselling (2nd ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
*Ivey, A. E., D’Andrea, M., Ivey, M. B., & Simek-Morgan, L. (2007) Theories of counseling and psychotherapy: A multicultural perspective (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
*James, R. K., & Gilliland, B. E. (2003). Theories and strategies in counseling and psychotherapy (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
*Kottler, J. A. (2002). Theories in counseling and psychotherapy: An experiential approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
*McLeod, J. (2003). An introduction to counselling (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
*Mobley, J. A. (2005). An integrated existential approach to counseling theory and practice. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.
*Nelson-Jones, R. (2006). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (4th ed.). London: Sage.
*Nystul, M. S. (2006). Introduction to counseling: An art and science perspective (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
*Parrott III, L. (2003). Counseling and psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.
*Seligman, L. (2006). Theories of counseling and psychotherapy: Systems, strategies and skills (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
*Sharf, R. S. (2008). Theories of psychotherapy and counseling: Concepts and cases (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove: Wadsworth.
*Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2004). Counseling and psychotherapy theories in context and practice. Hoboken: Wiley.
Still, A. W. (2001). Marginalisation is not unbearable. Is it even undesirable? Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 19, 55–66.
*Todd, J., & Bohart, A. C. (2006). Foundations of clinical and counseling psychology (4th ed.). Long Grove: Waveland Press.
Trexler, L. D. (1976). Frustration is a fact, not a feeling. Rational Living, 11(2), 19–22.
Wills, F. (2009). Beck’s cognitive therapy: Distinctive features. Hove: Routledge.
*Colledge, R. (2002). Mastering counselling theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
*Corey, G. (2005). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (7th ed.). Belmont: Brooks/Cole.
*Day, S. X. (2008). Theory and design in counseling and psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dryden, W. (2013). How Authors of Counseling and Psychotherapy Textbooks Conceptualize the ABC Framework. In: The ABCs of REBT Revisited. SpringerBriefs in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5734-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5734-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5733-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5734-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)