Toxic Organic Chemicals

  • Simanga GamaEmail author
  • Jon A. Arnot
  • Don Mackay


Organic chemicals play an invaluable role in the modern lifestyle. They include pharmaceuticals, pesticides, plastics, fuels, solvents, explosives, surface coatings, adhesives, disinfectants, and fire retardants. From the perspective of conservation and sustainability, the preferred strategy is to use chemicals such that they perform their desired function, cause no unintended adverse effects, and hence leave no legacy of contamination. This is a fundamental component in the move toward “green chemistry” which also strives to reduce resource depletion, energy use, ozone depletion, and interference with natural biogeochemical cycles.


Fire Retardant Environmental Fate Stockholm Convention Water Partition Coefficient Mass Balance Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The phenomenon similar to bioconcentration but including uptake from food as well as uptake from the ambient environment. This is expressed as a bioaccumulation factor (BAF) and generally applies to organisms in the environment. The BAF is the steady-state ratio of the chemical concentration in the organism to that in the environment.


The phenomenon by which an organism, such as a fish, absorbs chemical from its ambient environment of water or air by respiratory uptake and/or dermal absorption. The steady-state ratio of the chemical concentration in the organism to the chemical concentration in its ambient environment of water or air is the bioconcentration factor, (BCF) and the BCF is usually measured in a laboratory test.


The ratio of the chemical concentration in the predator to that of the prey.


The inherent toxic potency of a chemical, usually expressed as the quantity or concentration of the substance necessary to elicit a defined adverse effect in the organism.

Mass Balance Model

A mathematical description of the fate and transport of a chemical in the environment, usually in the form of a computer program. The model provides a complete accounting of all processes experienced by the chemical and is used to estimate environmental concentrations, persistence, and exposures. Models may also be used to forecast future changes in concentrations as a result of actions to reduce contamination.


The average time that a discharged chemical survives in the environment before it is degraded into another substance or substances. It may be expressed as a “half-life” by analogy to radioactive substances or as a residence time.


The likelihood that there will be an adverse effect as a result of exposure to the chemical. Risk thus depends both on toxic potency (hazard) and the prevailing exposure.


The phenomenon by which a chemical substance elicits an adverse effect on an exposed organism. The effect may be death (lethality) or a less severe effect such as a failure to reproduce, an increased vulnerability to predation or significant behavioral changes.


  1. 1.
    Mackay D, Shiu WY, Ma KC (2000) Physical-chemical Properties and Environmental Fate Handbook. Chapman and Hall CRCnetBASE, CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seth R, Mackay D, Muncke J (1999) Estimating the organic carbon partition coefficient and its variability for hydrophobic chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 33(14):2390–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkinson R, Arey J, Aschmann SM (2008) Atmospheric chemistry of alkanes: review and recent developments. Atmos Environ 42(23):5859–5871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howard PH, Boethling RS, Jarvis WF, Meylan WM, Michalenko EM (1991) Handbook of Environmental Degradation Rates. Lewis Publishers, ChelseaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arnot JA, Mackay D, Parkerton TF, Bonnell M (2008) A database of fish biotransformation rates for organic chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 27(11):2263–2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    U.S. EPA (2009) Exposure assessment tools and models, estimation programs interface (EPI) suite, ver. 4.0. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Exposure Assessment Branch, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Government of Canada, Persistence and Bioaccumulation Regulations. Canada Gazette Part II March 29, 2000Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Webster E, Mackay D, Wania F (1998) Evaluating environmental persistence. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:2148–2158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wegmann F, Cavin L, MacLeod M, Scheringer M, Hungerbühler K (2009) The OECD software tool for screening chemicals for persistence and long-range transport potential. Environ Modell Softw 24(2):228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    UNEP (2001) Final Act of the Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. In: United Nations Environment Program, Geneva, Switzerland, p 44Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gouin T, Mackay D, Webster E, Wania F (2000) Screening chemicals for persistence in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 34(5):881–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mackay D, McCarthy LS, MacLeod M (2001) On the validity of classifying chemicals for persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity and potential for long-range transport. Environ Toxicol Chem 20(7):1491–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheringer M (2002) Persistence and Spatial Range of Environmental Chemicals. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wania F (2003) Assessing the potential of persistent organic chemicals for long-range transport and accumulation in polar regions. Environ Sci Technol 37(7):1344–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wania F, Mackay D (1995) A global distribution model for persistent organic-chemicals. Sci Total Environ 161:211–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arnot JA, Mackay D, Webster E, Southwood JM (2006) Screening level risk assessment model for chemical fate and effects in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 40(7):2316–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guglielmo F, Lammel G, Maier-Reimer E (2009) Global environmental cycling of γ-HCH and DDT in the 1980s – a study using a coupled atmosphere and ocean general circulation model. Chemosphere 76(11):1509–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gobas FAPC, Morrison HA (2000) Bioconcentration and Biomagnification in the Aquatic Environment. In: Boethling RS, Mackay D (eds) Handbook of Property Estimation Methods for Chemicals: Environmental and Health Sciences. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCarty LS, Mackay D (1993) Enhancing ecotoxicological modeling and assessment: body residues and modes of toxic action. Environ Sci Technol 27(9):1719–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haritash AK, Kaushik CP (2009) Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review. J Hazard Mater 169(1–3):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mastral AM, Callen MS (2000) A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emissions from energy generation. Environ Sci Technol 34(15):3051–3057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilson SC, Jones KC (1993) Bioremediation of soil contaminated with polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review. Environ Pollut 81(3):229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kannan K, Blankenship AL, Jones PD, Giesy JP (2000) Toxicity reference values for the toxic effects of polychlorinated biphenyls to aquatic mammals. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 6:181–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hornbuckle K, Robertson L (2010) Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs): sources, exposures, toxicities. Environ Sci Technol 44(8):2749–2751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fox GA, Weseloh DV, Kubiak TJ, Erdman TC (1991) Reproductive outcomes in colonial fish-eating birds – a biomarker for developmental toxicants in Great-Lakes food-chains.1. Historical and ecotoxicological perspectives. J Great Lakes Res 17(2):153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoffman DJ, Rice CP, Kubiak TJ (1996) PCBs and dioxins in birds. In: Beyer WN, Heinz GH, Redmon-Norwood AW (eds) Environmental Contaminants in Wildlife: Interpreting Tissue Concentrations. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 165–207Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Borga K, Fisk AT, Hargrave B, Hoekstra PF, Swackhamer D, Muir DCG (2005) Bioaccumulation factors for PCBs revisited. Environ Sci Technol 39(12):4523–4532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aken BV, Correa PA, Schnoor JL (2009) Phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyls: new trends and promises. Environ Sci Technol 44(8):2767–2776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Van den Berg M, Birnbaum LS, Bosveld ATC, Brunstrom B, Cook P, Feeley M, Giesy JP, Hanberg A, Hasegawa R, Kennedy SW, Kubiak T, Larsen JC, van Leeuwen FXR, Liem AKD, Nolt C, Peterson RE, Poellinger L, Safe S, Schrenk D, Tillitt DE, Tysklind M, Younes M, Waern F, Zacharewski T (1998) Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ Health Perspect 106(12):775–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Domingo JL, Bocio A (2007) Levels of PCDD/PCDFs and PCBs in edible marine species and human intake: a literature review. Environ Int 33(3):397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lohmann R, Jones KC (1998) Dioxins and furans in air and deposition – a review of levels, behavior and process. Sci Total Environ 219:53–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aberg A, MacLeod M, Wiberg K (2008) Physical-chemical property data for dibenzo-p-dioxin (DD), dibenzofuran (DF), and chlorinated DD/Fs: a critical review and recommended values. J Phys Chem Ref Data 37(4):1997–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hites RA (2004) Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in the environment and in people: a meta-analysis of concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 38(4):945–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vonderheide AP, Mueller KE, Meija J, Welsh GL (2008) Polybrominated diphenyl ethers: causes for concern and knowledge gaps regarding environmental distribution, fate and toxicity. Sci Total Environ 400(1–3):425–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang Y, Jiang G, Lam PKS, Li A (2007) Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in the East Asian environment: a critical review. Environ Int 33(7):963–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    de Wit CA, Herzke D, Vorkamp K (2010) Brominated flame retardants in the Arctic environment – trends and new candidates. Sci Total Environ 408(15):2885–2918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Staples CA, Peterson DR, Parkerton TF, Adams WJ (1997) The environmental fate of phthalate esters: a literature review. Chemosphere 35(4):667–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Peijenburg WJGM, Struis J (2006) Occurrence of phthalate esters in the environment of the Netherlands. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 63:204–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shiu W, Ma K-C, Varhanickova D, Mackay D (1994) Chlorophenols and alkylphenols: a review and correlation of environmentally relevant properties and fate in an evaluative environment. Chemosphere 29(6):1155–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Topping DC, Bernard LG, O'Donoghue JL, English JC (2007) Hydroquinone: acute and subchronic toxicity studies with emphasis on neurobehavioral and nephrotoxic effects. Food Chem Toxicol 45:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Weber J, Halsall CJ, Muir D, Teixeira C, Small J, Solomon K, Hermanson M, Bidleman T (2010) Endosulfan, a global pesticide: a review of its fate in the environment and occurrence in the Arctic. Sci Total Environ 408:2966–2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hoferkamp L, Hermanson MH, Muir DCG (2010) Current use pesticides in Arctic media; 2000–2007. Sci Total Environ 408(15):2985–2994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Li YF, Macdonald RW (2005) Sources and pathways of selected organochlorine pesticides to the Arctic and the effect of pathway divergence on trends in biota: a review. Sci Total Environ 342(1–3):87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Muir DCG, de Wit CA (2010) Trends of legacy and new persistent organic pollutants in the circumpolar arctic: overview, conclusions, and recommendations. Sci Total Environ 408:3044–3051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Graiver D, Farminer KW, Narayan R (2003) A review of the fate and effects of silicones in the environment. J Polym Environ 11(4):129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hiroi T, Okada K, Imaoka S, Osada M, Funae Y (2006) Bisphenol A binds to protein disulfide isomerase and inhibits its enzymatic and hormone-binding activities. Endocrinology 147:2773–2780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Meeker JD, Calafat AM, Hauser R (2010) Urinary bisphenol A concentrations in relation to serum thyroid and reproductive hormone levels in men from an infertility clinic. Environ Sci Technol 44(4):1458–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Destaillats H, Maddalena RL, Singer BC, Hodgson AT, McKone TE (2008) Indoor pollutants emitted by office equipment: a review of reported data and information needs. Atmos Environ 42(7):1371–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brown TN, Wania F (2008) Screening chemicals for the potential to be persistent organic pollutants: a case study of arctic contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 42(14):5202–5209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Howard PH, Muir DCG (2010) Identifying new persistent and bioaccumulative organics among chemicals in commerce. Environ Sci Technol 44(7):2277–2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Muir DCG, Howard PH (2006) Are there other persistent organic pollutants? A challenge for environmental chemists. Environ Sci Technol 40(23):7157–7166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Canadian Centre for Environmental Modelling and ChemistryTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  2. 2.Department of Physical and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Toronto ScarboroughTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations