How to Intervene with Unethical and Unprofessional Colleagues

  • Jerald Belitz


All academic health disciplines endeavor to ensure that professionals apply safe and effective interventions to patients, ethically conduct research, and respectfully interact with colleagues and students. Each profession is expected to develop mechanisms to monitor and regulate the performance of its members. Three substrates for ethical and professional violations are identified: impairment, incompetence, and unethical conduct. Though mental health professionals have the awareness of professional ethics and the acumen to identify unethical practices, a significant number of clinicians remain uncomfortable and reluctant to report or intervene with their unprincipled colleagues. Known as the culture of silence, clinicians struggle with the dilemma of either protecting the privacy and confidentiality of their colleague or securing the safety and well-being of the patient, student, research subject, or public. However, there are three fundamental reasons for intervening with an impaired, incompetent, or unethical colleague: prevention of harm to patients or others, prevention of harm to one’s profession, and assistance to impaired peers. Specific interventions depend on the professional’s manifest incompetence and unprofessionalism and the level of risk to a patient and others. Interventions can include a dialogue with one’s colleague, referral to a physician assistance program, report to the colleague’s supervisor or administrator, or a report to a licensing board or other oversight entity. It is important for training programs to integrate ethics and professionalism into their curricula and for professions to maintain self-care.


Sexual Harassment Unethical Behavior Professional Standard Hippocratic Oath Injured Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of medical ethics of the American Medical Association (2008–2009 edition). Chicago: American Medical Association; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct: 2010 amendments. 2010. Accessed 19 Dec 2011.
  3. 3.
    Bernard JL, Jara CS. The failure of clinical psychology graduate students to apply understood ethical principles. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 1986;17:313–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernard JL, Murphy M, Little M. The failure of clinical psychologists to apply understood ethical principles. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 1987;18:489–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DesRoches CM, Rao SR, Fromson JA, et al. Physician’s perceptions, preparedness for reporting, and experience related to impaired and incompetent colleagues. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;304:187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farber NJ, Gilbert SG, Aboff BM, et al. Physician’s willingness to report impaired colleagues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1772–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilkins MA, McGuire JM, Abbott DW, Blau BI. Willingness to apply understood ethical principles. J Clin Psychol. 1990;46:539–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Reporting impaired, incompetent or unethical colleagues. CEJA Report A – I-91; 1992.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Psychology Association Advisory Committee on Colleague Assistance. The stress–distress-impairment continuum for psychologists. n.d. Accessed 16 Dec 2011.
  10. 10.
    Baldisseri MR. Impaired healthcare professional. Crit Care Med 2007;35(Suppl.):S106–16.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boisaubin EV, Levine RE. Identifying and assisting the impaired physician. Am J Med Sci. 2001;322:31–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roberts LW, Dyer AR. Ethics in mental health care. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2004.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson A, Rosen A, Randal P, et al. Psychiatrically impaired medical practitioners: an overview with special reference to impaired psychiatrists. Australas Psychiatry. 2009;17:6–10.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dhai A, Szabo CP, McQuoid-Mason DJ. The impaired practitioner – scope of the problem and ethical challenges. S Afr Med J. 2006;96:1069–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carinci AJ, Christo PJ. Physician impairment: is recovery feasible? Pain Phys J. 2009;12:487–91.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Layman MJ, McNamara RJ. Remediation for ethics violations: focus on psychotherapists’ sexual contact with clients. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 1997;28:281–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morreim EH. Am I my brother’s warden? Responding to the unethical or incompetent colleague. Hastings Cent Rep. 1993;23:19–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    University of New Mexico. Board of regents policy manual. 2010. Accessed 19 Dec 2011.
  19. 19.
    Cohen S. The conspiracy of silence. Can Fam Phys. 1980;26:847–9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mustard LW. The culture of silence: disruptive and impaired physicians. J Med Pract Manage. 2009;25:153–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pope KS, Tabachnick BG, Keith-Spiegel P. The beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as therapists. Am Psychol. 1987;42:993–1006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lo B. Resolving ethical dilemmas: a guide for clinicians. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Overstreet MM. Duty to report colleagues who engage in fraud or deception. In: American Psychiatric Association, editors. Ethics primer of the American Psychiatric Association. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2001, p. 51–55.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Merlo LJ, Altenburger KM, Gold MS. Physician’s experience with impaired colleagues. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;304:1895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rosen A, Wison A, Randal P, Pethebridge A, Codyre D, Barton D, Norrie P, McGeorge P, Rose L. Psychiatrically impaired medical practitioners: better care to reduce harm and life impact, with special reference to impaired psychiatrists. Australas Psychiatry. 2009;17:11–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    University of New Mexico. University business policies and procedures manual. 2012. Accessed 10 Jan 12.
  27. 27.
    Koocher GP, Keith-Spiegel P. Ethics in psychology and the mental health professions: standards and cases. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    O’Connor MF, APA Advisory Committee on Colleague Assistance. Intervening with an impaired colleague. n.d. Accessed 16 Dec 2011.
  29. 29.
    Pope KS, Vasquez MJT. Ethics in psychotherapy and counseling: a practical guide. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    VandenBos GR, Duthie RF. Confronting and supporting colleagues in distress. In: Kilburg R, Nathan P, Thoreson R, editors. Professionals in distress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1986. p. 211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Belitz J. On professionalism. In: Roberts LW, Hoop J, editors. Professionalism and ethics: Q & A self-study guide for mental health professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2008, p. 73–78.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    D’eon M, Lear N, Turner M, Jones C. Perils of the hidden curriculum revisited. Med Teach. 2007;29:295–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roberts LW, Warner TD, et al. Perceptions of academic vulnerability associated with personal illness: a study of 1,027 students at nine medical schools. Compr Psychiatry. 2001;42:1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations