Abstract
Mentorship relationships have the potential to impart numerous benefits to early- and middle-career academic physicians–scientists, clinicians, and administrators. These relationships not only influence the mentee’s decision to enter and remain in academic medicine, but they have been shown to increase self-confidence and productivity, improve overall career satisfaction, and enhance the mentee’s sense of professional community.
Mentee self-awareness and a thoughtfully conceived professional development plan are crucial to the initiation of successful mentoring partnerships. Also essential is the ability to identify and effectively engage mentors who possess the talents, expertise, and professional connections likely to benefit the mentee.
From the very beginning of the relationship, careful consideration should be given to the structure of mentoring encounters and to expectations for the mentorship experience. Mutually beneficial relationships will best sustain as the result of thorough preparation for meetings, continuous hard work, and ongoing assessment of outcomes.
Termination of mentorships should be an anticipated aspect of relationship progression. Although such terminations may on occasion unfortunately occur as personality conflicts became insurmountable, they most commonly end or fade away in more developmentally appropriate fashion as goals are met or mentees advance to positions of increased autonomy.
Mentorship relationships are dynamic and reciprocal processes. These processes are best guided by the mentee’s self-determined goals and career visions that evolve and mature through the interactive and iterative experiences of mentorship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carey EC, Weissman DE. Understanding and finding mentorship: a review for junior faculty. J Palliat Med. 2010;13:1373–9.
Berk RA, Mortimer R, Walton-Moss B, Yeo TP. Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med. 2005;80(1):66–71.
Sambunjak D, Straus S, Marusic A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1103–15.
Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC, et al. Junior faculty members’ mentoring relationships and their professional development in US medical schools. Acad Med. 1998;73(3):318–23.
Rodenhauser P, Rudisill JR, Dvorak R. Skills for mentors and proteges applicable to psychiatry. Acad Med. 2000;24(1):14–27.
Allen TD, Eby LT, Lentz E. Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: closing the gap between research and practice. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(3):567–78.
Johnson KS, Hastings SN, Purser JL, Whitson H. The junior faculty laboratory: an innovative model of peer mentoring. Acad Med. 2011;86(12):1577–82.
Waitzkin H, Yager J, Parker T, Duran B. Mentoring partnerships for minority faculty and graduate students in mental health services research. Acad Psychiatry. 2006;30(3):205–17.
Keyser DJ, Lakoski JM, Lara-Cinisomo S, et al. Advancing institutional efforts to support research mentorship: a conceptual framework and self-assessment tool. Acad Med. 2008;83(3):217–25.
Rubio DM, Primack BA, Switzer GE, et al. A comprehensive career-success model for physician–scientists. Acad Med. 2011;86(12):1571–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Becker, A., Yager, J. (2013). How to Approach Mentorship as a Mentee. In: Roberts, L. (eds) The Academic Medicine Handbook. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5693-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5693-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5692-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5693-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)