Abstract
Learning the skills and habits to network well and be a good colleague holds immense potential to improve the quality of our lives as well as our connections to one another. Networks—whether defined as one’s network of friends, family, colleagues, or permutations and combinations of all three—can serve to support and promote our personal and professional needs, while fostering a greater sense of connectedness and responsibility within our community. Moreover, these networks are strongly associated with scientific creativity, job performance, findings new jobs, and promotion. In addition to driving individual development and success, social networks are also associated with departmental and even organizational success. Despite the large impact of social networks, many in academic medicine feel uncomfortable with “networking.” This is unfortunate, because those who are uncomfortable with networking and developing the power of their network may be missing out on important opportunities. Social network scholars view an individual as embedded in a larger web of relationships. Ideally, to expand one’s network, one should look for those who are “similar enough” to meet and talk to, but who are also “different enough” to develop new ideas and ways of working together that leverage these differences. To increase the diversity of one’s network, we offer single overarching piece of advice: Be authentically curious about others. Finally, in order to be a good colleague, the academic must know oneself, know one’s limits and traits, and develop techniques for working with these optimally, with appropriate boundaries, in one’s interactions with colleagues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beach MC, Inui T. Relationship-centered care. A constructive reframing. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21 Suppl 1:S3–8.
Cuff PA, Vanselow, N (Eds). Committee on Behavioral and Social Sciences in Medical School Curricula. Improving Medical Education: Enhancing the Behavioral and Social Science Content of Medical School Curricula. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2004.
Pololi L, Conrad P, Knight S, et al. A study of the relational aspects of the culture of academic medicine. Acad Med. 2009;84:106–14.
Schindler BA, Novack DH, Cohen DG, et al. The impact of the changing health care environment on the health and well-being of faculty at four medical schools. Acad Med. 2006;81:27–34.
Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, et al. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science. 2009;323:892–5.
Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78:1360–80.
Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. In: Marsden P, Lin N, editors. Social structure and network analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1982. p. 105–30.
Burt RS. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Boston: Harvard University; 1992.
Montoya RM, Horton RS, Kirchner J. Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. J Soc Pers Relat. 2008;25:889–922.
Byrne D. The attraction paradigm. London: Academic; 1971.
Deborah Rhodes: a tool that finds 3x more breast tumors, and why it’s not available to you. 2011. http://www.ted.com/talks/deborah_rhodes.html. Accessed Jan 6 2011.
Reskin B. Sex differentiation and the social organization of science. In: Gaston J, editor. Sociology of science. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 1978. p. 6–37.
Epstein C. Woman’s place: options and limits in professional careers. Berkeley: University of California; 1970.
Emmett A. A woman’s institute of technology. Technol Rev. 1992; April: 16–8.
Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K. Social pressures in informal groups: a study of human factors in housing. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University; 1950.
Lee K, Brownstein JS, Mills RG, et al. Does collocation inform the impact of collaboration? PLoS One. 2010;5:e14279.
Gouldner AW. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev. 1960;25:161–78.
Ury W. The power of a positive no. New York: Bantam Books; 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kass, E., Dunn, L.B. (2013). How to Network and Be a Good Colleague. In: Roberts, L. (eds) The Academic Medicine Handbook. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5693-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5693-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5692-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5693-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)