Image Guidance

Chapter

Abstract

Image guidance (IG) can serve as a very important adjunct to the surgeon during MISS. There is robust data showing that IG decreases the incidence of suboptimal screw placement. The ability of IG to decrease the incidence of neurological complications or need for reoperations following thoracolumbar instrumentation remains unclear. IG offers particular advantages in cases of severe deformity or other altered anatomy as well as for the intraoperative training of residents and fellows. IG offers the further benefit of minimizing occupational exposures to ionizing radiation for the surgeon and OR staff. Future studies will help to modify imaging protocols in IG to also minimize patients’ radiation exposure.

How widespread IG ultimately becomes in spine surgery will be based on balancing improvements in surgical accuracy (and resultant improvements in clinical outcomes) with concerns over cost, efficiency, and radiation exposures. Our personal experience has shown the technology to be both efficient and cost-effective by reducing screw revision rates and reducing occupational radiation exposures. Further research is needed to clarify the answers to these questions and better define the true role of IG in spine surgery.

Keywords

Perforation Crest 

References

  1. 1.
    Wood M, Mannion R. A comparison of CT-based navigation techniques for minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24(1):E1–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wood MJ, Mannion RJ. Improving accuracy and reducing radiation exposure in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12(5):533–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Karageorgos AC, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(2):247–55.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tian NF, Xu HZ. Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(4):895–903.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(3):E111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silbermann J, Riese F, Allam Y, Reichert T, Koeppert H, Gutberlet M. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):875–81.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beck M, Mittlmeier T, Gierer P, Harms C, Gradl G. Benefit and accuracy of intraoperative 3D-imaging after pedicle screw placement: a prospective study in stabilizing thoracolumbar fractures. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(10):1469–77.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(5):606–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Girardi FP, Cammisa Jr FP, Sandhu HS, Alvarez L. The placement of lumbar pedicle screws using computerised stereotactic guidance. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(5):825–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Larson AN, Santos ER, Polly Jr DW, Ledonio CG, Sembrano JN, Mielke CH, et al. Pediatric pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography and 3-dimensional image-guided navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(3):E188–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;203:7–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gang C, Haibo L, Fancai L, Weishan C, Qixin C. Learning curve of thoracic pedicle screw placement using the free-hand technique in scoliosis: how many screws needed for an apprentice? Eur Spine J. 2012;21:1151–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, Mohsen A. Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5, 992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(3):370–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(3):235–40.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, Shetty AP. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(2):E56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Modi H, Suh SW, Song HR, Yang JH. Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in scoliosis using the ideal pedicle entry point during the freehand technique. Int Orthop. 2009;33(2):469–75.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(3):333–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Farber SH, Amin AG, Rick AM, Suk I, et al. Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1):170–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karapinar L, Erel N, Ozturk H, Altay T, Kaya A. Pedicle screw placement with a free hand technique in thoracolumbar spine: is it safe? J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(1):63–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Winter RB. Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(11):1519–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM, Kim JH, Chung ER. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(18):2049–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavalleé S, Sautot P. Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:39–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yson SC, Sembrano JN, Sanders PC, Santos ER, Ledonio CG, Polly Jr DW. Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(4):E251–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Watkins RG, Gupta A, Watkins RG. Cost-effectiveness of image-guided spine surgery. Open Orthop J. 2010;6(4):228–33.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wrixon AD. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot. 2008;28(2):161–8.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bindal RK, Glaze S, Ognoskie M, Tunner V, Malone R, Ghosh S. Surgeon and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9(6):570–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, Williams S, Solomito M. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(20):2637–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith HE, Welsch MD, Sasso RC, Vaccaro AR. Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(5):532–7.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Izadpanah K, Konrad G, Südkamp NP, Oberst M. Computer navigation in balloon kyphoplasty reduces the intraoperative radiation exposure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(12):1325–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Theocharopoulos N, Papadokostakis G, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Patient exposure and associated radiation risks from fluoroscopically guided vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Radiology. 2004;232(3):701–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryHartford Healthcare Medical GroupNew BritainUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations