Advertisement

Anterior Column Realignment (ACR): Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Adult Sagittal Plane Deformity

  • Gregory M. MundisJr.
  • Nima Kabirian
  • Behrooz A. Akbarnia
Chapter

Abstract

Adult sagittal plane alignment is the result of an intricate interaction between the spine and pelvis. The development of a sagittal spine deformity results in a series of compensatory mechanisms including increase in pelvic tilt, hip extensor overutilization, and knee and ankle flexion. When these natural mechanisms fail, patients may develop symptomatic sagittal imbalance, which ultimately affects their function and quality of life.

Traditional techniques to address sagittal spine deformity include posterior-based spine osteotomies to restore the sagittal balance. Historically, however, these techniques have been associated with a high morbidity, long operative times, and excessive blood loss.

This chapter focuses on the treatment of sagittal spinal deformity using a novel minimally invasive technique, anterior column realignment (ACR). The technique utilizes a retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine with lateral interbody fusion after transecting the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) to restore focal sagittal alignment. The preliminary report of our first 17 patients has shown promising short-term results. Attention to case selection and technical pearls of the ACR is of utmost importance to achieve desirable outcomes and avoid catastrophic complications.

Keywords

Minimally Invasive Surgery Interbody Fusion Pelvic Tilt Lumbar Lordosis Pelvic Incidence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH. Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine. 1989;14(7):717–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine. 1995;20(12):1351–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine. 2009;34(17):1828–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lafage V, Bharucha NJ, Schwab F, Hart RA, Burton D, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Multicenter validation of a formula predicting postoperative spinopelvic alignment. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(1):15–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duval-Beaupere G, Schmidt C, Cosson P. A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng. 1992;20(4):451–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H. Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(1):40–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine. 2009;34(17):599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine. 2005;30(6):682–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine. 2005;30(18):2024–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Lewis SJ. Treatment of spinal stenosis and fixed sagittal imbalance. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:35–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH. The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity: building on the King/Moe and Lenke classification systems. Spine. 2006;31(19 Suppl):S119–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D, et al. SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine. 2011;37(12):1077–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Auerbach JD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Sehn JK, Milby AH, Bumpass D, et al. Major complications and comparison between 3-column osteotomy techniques in 105 consecutive spinal deformity procedures. Spine. 2012;37(14):1198–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho W, Zebala LP, Pahys JM, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical outcome and complications in primary versus revision adult scoliosis surgery. Spine. 2012;37(5):393–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Yi JS, Pahys JM, Zebala LP, et al. Major complications in revision adult deformity surgery: risk factors and clinical outcomes with 2- to 7-year follow-up. Spine. 2012;37(6):489–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kuhns CA, Lehman Jr RA, Kim YJ, et al. Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine. 2007;32(20):2245–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, Rodgers WB, Phillips FM. A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine. 2010;35(26 Suppl):S322–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA, Raley E, DeBauche S, Shucosky E, Chotikul L. Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine. 2010;35(26 Suppl):S302–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS. Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28(3):E8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Acosta FL, Liu J, Slimack N, Moller D, Fessler R, Koski T. Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15(1):92–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Le TV, Vivas AC, Dakwar E, Baaj AA, Uribe JS. The effect of the retroperitoneal transpsoas minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion on segmental and regional lumbar lordosis. Scientific World Journal. 2012;2012:516706.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anand N, Baron EM. Minimally invasive approaches for the correction of adult spinal deformity. Eur Spine J. 2013;22 Suppl 2:232–41.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Salari P, Bagheri R. Is the less invasive far lateral approach a safe way to reconstruct the anterior spinal column in advanced adult deformity surgery? A minimum 2-year follow-up study. In: IMAST2010: adult scoliosis and kyphosis: proceedings of 17th international meeting on advanced spine technique, IMAST2010, 21–24 July 2010, Toronto, Canada. Milwaukee: The Scoliosis Research Society; 2010.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marchi L, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Castro C, Coutinho T, Coutinho E, et al. Anterior elongation as a minimally invasive alternative for sagittal imbalance—a case series. HSS J. 2012;8(2):122–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kepler CK, Huang RC, Sharma AK, Meredith DS, Metitiri O, Sama AA, et al. Factors influencing segmental lumbar lordosis after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Orthop Surg. 2012;4(2):71–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Uribe JS, Smith DA, Dakwar E, Baaj AA, Mundis GM, Turner AW, et al. Lordosis restoration after anterior longitudinal ligament release and placement of lateral hyperlordotic interbody cages during the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: a radiographic study in cadavers. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(5):476–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Deukmedjian AR, Dakwar E, Ahmadian A, Smith DA, Uribe JS. Early outcomes of minimally invasive anterior longitudinal ligament release for correction of sagittal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity. Scientific World Journal. 2012;2012:789698.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Moazzaz P, Kabirian N, Bagheri R, Eastlack RK, et al. Anterior column realignment (ACR) for focal kyphotic spinal deformity using a lateral transpsoas interbody approach and ALL release. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27(1):29–39.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Legaye J, Hecquet J, Marty C, Duval-Beaupère G. Equilibre sagittal du rachis: relations entre bassin et courbures rachidiennes sagittales en position debout. Rachis. 1993;5:215–26.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith JS, Sansur CA, Donaldson 3rd WF, Perra JH, Mudiyam R, Choma TJ, et al. Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine. 2011;36(12):958–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory M. MundisJr.
    • 1
  • Nima Kabirian
    • 1
  • Behrooz A. Akbarnia
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Spine SurgerySan Diego Center for Spinal DisordersLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of California, San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations