Abstract
Health care providers practicing their profession with reasonable skill and safety is essential for the safety and well-being of the public. Physicians and other health care professionals may have their fitness for duty questioned by a variety of agencies tasked with oversight of the behavior of health care professionals. Mental health clinicians performing a fitness-for-duty evaluation of a physician or other health care professional will be required to conduct a comprehensive assessment, taking into account the impact of any disabling conditions, and provide opinions regarding the prognosis with treatment, the side effects of treatment, and the present and future impacts on the practice of medicine. The evaluating clinician will be asked for recommendations about whether treatment or professional workplace supervision may be needed to decrease the risk of future deterioration of professional capacities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, B.H., Checkoway, H., Nagahama, S.I., et al.: Cause–specific mortality risks of anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 93, 922–930 (2000)
American Board of Medical Specialties: Board Certification Editorial Background. http://www.abms.org/news_and_events/media_newsroom/pdf/abms_editorialbackground.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2011
American Medical Association. Model medical staff code of conduct: https//www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/omssama-medical-staff-code-of-conduct.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2011, Revised 24 May 2010
American Medical Association Opinion E-9.0305 Physician Health and Wellness: American Medical Association. http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/physician-health/policies-physicain-health.pdf, Accessed 2 Feb 2012, Issued June 2004
American Medical Association Opinion on Professional Rights and Responsibilities E-9.045 Physicians with Disruptive Behavior: American Medical Association. http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/physician-health/policies-physicain-health.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2012, Issued Dec 2000
American Medical Association: Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S. AMA Press, Chicago (2002–2003)
American Psychiatric Association: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 4th edn. (Text revision). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (2000)
Anfang, S.A., Faulkner, L.R., Fromson, J.A., et al.: The American Psychiatric Association’s resource document on guidelines for fitness-for-duty evaluations of physicians. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 33(1), 85–88 (2005)
Buhl, A., Oreskovich, M.R., Meredith, C.W., et al.: Prognosis for the recovery of surgeons from chemical dependency, a 5 year outcome study. Arch. Surg. 146(11), 1286–1291 (2011)
Bryson, E.A.: Should anesthesia residents with a history of substance abuse be allowed to continue training in clinical anesthesia? The results of a survey of anesthesia residency program directors. J. Clin. Anesth. 21, 508–513 (2009)
Collins, C.B.: Chemical dependency treatment outcomes of residents in anesthesiology: Results of a survey. Anesth. Analg. 101, 1457–1462 (2005)
Cummings, S.M., Merlo, L., Cottler, L.: Mechanisms of prescription drug diversion among impaired physicians. J. Addict. Dis. 30(3), 195–202 (2011)
DesRoches, C.M., Rao, S.R., Fromson, J.A., et al.: Physicians’ perceptions, preparedness for reporting, and experiences related to impaired and incompetent colleagues. JAMA 304(2), 187–193 (2010)
Domino, K.B., Hornbeim, T.F., Polissar, N.L.: Risk factors for relapse in health care professionals with substance abuse disorders. JAMA 293(12), 1453–1460 (2005)
Dupont, R.L., McLellan, A.T., White, W.L., et al.: Setting a standard for recovery: Physicians’ health programs. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 36, 159–171 (2009a)
DuPont, R.L., McLellan, A.T., Carr, G., et al.: How are addicted physicians treated? A national survey of Physician Health Programs. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 37(1), 1–7 (2009b)
Epstein, R.H., Gratch, D.M., Grunwald, A.: Development of a scheduled drug diversion surveillance system based on an analysis of atypical drug interactions. Anesth. Analg. 105, 1053–1060 (2007)
Farber, N.G., Gilbert, S.G., Aboff, B.M., et al.: Physicians’ willingness to report unimpaired colleagues. Soc. Sci. Med. 61(8), 1772–1775 (2005)
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, Inc.: A Guide to the Essentials of the Modern Medical and Osteopathic Practice Act. http://fsmb/org/pdf/GRPOL_essentials.pdf (2009). Accessed 12 Dec 2011
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, Inc.: Addressing Sexual Boundaries: Guidelines for State Medical Boards. http://fsmb/org/pdf/GRPOL_Sexual%20Boundaries.pdf (2006). Accessed 12 Dec 2011
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States: Policy on Physician Impairment. Accessed Apr 2011
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States: Summary of 2011 Board Activities. www.fsmb.org/pdf/2011-survey-of-board-actions-pdf. Accessed 17 Mar 2012
Federation of State Physician Health Programs: Physician Health Program Guidelines http://www.fsphp.org/2005FSPHP_Guidelines.pdf (2005). Accessed 12 Dec 2011
Flaherty, J.A., Richman, J.A.: Substance use and addiction among medical students, residents, and physicians. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 16(1), 189–197 (1993)
Gabbard, G.O.: Psychotherapists who transgress boundaries with patients. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 58, 124–135 (1994)
Gold, L.H., Anfang, S.A., Drukteinis, A.M., et al.: AAPL practice guideline for the forensic evaluation of psychiatric disability. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 36(4), S3–S50 (2008)
Gold, M.S., Graham, N.A., Goldberger, B.A.: Second-hand and third-hand drug exposures in the operating room: A factor in anesthesiologists’ dependency on fentanyl. J. Addict. Dis. 29, 280–281 (2010)
Grant, D., Alford, K.: Sanction and recidivism: An evaluation of physician discipline by State Medical Boards. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 35(1), 867–855 (2007)
Heath Care Quality Improvement Act, 42 U.S.C. 11101 ct seq (1986)
Hickson, G.B., Federspeil, C.F., Pichert, J.W., et al.: Patient complaints and malpractice risks. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 287(22), 2951–2957 (2001)
Hilliard, J.T.: The threat worse than malpractice. Med. Econ. 80, 38 (2003)
Hughes, P.H., Brandenburg, N., Baldwin, D.C., et al.: Prevalence of substance use among US physicians. JAMA 267(17), 2333–2339 (1992)
Irons, R.: The behaviorally disruptive professional. Paradigm Summer, 6–7 (2001)
Janofsky, J.S.: Competency to practice and licensing. In: Buchanan, A., Norko, M.A. (eds.) The Psychiatric Report, Principals and Practice of Forensic Writing, pp. 145–157. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)
Jesilow, P., Ohlander, J.: The impact of the National Practitioner Data Bank on licensing actions by state medical licensing boards. J. Health Hum. Serv. Adm. 33(1), 94–126 (2010)
Jost, T.S.: Legal issues in quality of care oversight in the United States: Recent developments. Eur. J. Health Law 10, 11–25 (2003)
The Joint Commission: Issue 40: Behaviors that undermine a culture of safety issued 9 July 2008. www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/SEA_40PDF (2008). Accessed 2 Feb 2012
The Joint Commission: Leadership in healthcare organization. A guide to Joint Commission leadership standards: A governance institute white paper, Winter 2009 Governance Institute San Diego. www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/WP_leadership_standards.pdf (2009). Accessed 2 Feb 2012
Knight, J.R., Sanchez, L.T., Sherritt, L., et al.: Outcomes of a monitoring program for physicians with mental and behavioral health problems. J. Psychiat. Pract. 13(1), 25–32 (2007)
Kohatsu, N.D., Gould, D., Ross, L.K., et al.: Characteristics associated with physician discipline: A case control study. Arch. Intern. Med. 164, 653–658 (2004)
Kissoon, N., Lapenta, S., Armstrong, G.: Diagnosis and therapy for the disruptive physician. Physician Exec. 28, 54–58 (2002)
Krizek, T.J.: The impaired surgical resident. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 84(6), 1587–1604 (2004)
Kuerer, H.M., Eberlein, T.J., Pollock, R.E., et al.: Career satisfaction, practice patterns and burnout among surgical oncologists: Report on the quality of life of members of the Society of Surgical Oncology. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 14(11), 3043–3053 (2007)
Leape, L.L., Fromson, J.A.: Problem doctors: Is there a system-level solution? Ann. Int. Med. 144, 107–115 (2006)
Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 112 § 5f (Westlaw, Current through Chapter 102 of the 2012 2nd Annual Session)
McLellan, A.T., Skipper, G.S., Campbell, M., et al.: Five year outcomes in a cohort study of physicians treated for substance use disorders in the United States. BMJ 337, 1–6 (2008)
Merlo, L.J., Greene, W.M.: Physician views regarding substance use-related participation in a state physician health committee. Am. J. Addict. Psychiatry 19, 529–533 (2010)
Meyer, D.J., Price, M.: Forensic psychiatric assessments of behaviorally disruptive physicians. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 34(1), 72–81 (2006)
Meyer, D.J., Price, M.: Peer review committees and state licensing boards: Responding to allegations of physician misconduct. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 40, 193–201 (2012)
National Practitioner Data Bank, 42 U.S.C. 11101 ct seq (1986)
North Carolina Medical Board: Survey of the effect of disciplinary actions on board certification. http://www.ncmedboard.org/images/uploads/minutes_uploads/Investigative_Disciplinary_Committee.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2011
Patel, P., Robinson, B.S., Novicoff, W.M., et al.: The disruptive orthopedic surgeon: Implications for patient safety and malpractice liability. J. Bone. Joint Surg. Am. 93, e126(1–6). http://dx.dol.org/10.2106/JBJSJ.01933 (2011)
Pelton, C., Lang, D.A., Nye, G.S., et al.: Physician diversion program experience with successful graduates. J. Psychoact. Drugs 25(2), 159–164 (1993)
Pfifferling, J.H.: Physicians’ disruptive behavior: Consequences for medical quality and safety. Am. J. Med. Qual. 203, 96–105 (2008)
Piper, L.E.: Addressing the phenomenon of disruptive physician behavior. Health Care Manag. 22, 335–337 (2003)
Roback, H.B., Strassberg, D., Iannelli, R.J., et al.: Problematic physicians: A comparison of personality profiles by offense type. Can. J. Psychiatry 52(5), 315–322 (2007)
Roberts, L.W., Warner, T.D., Rogers, M., et al.: Medical student illness and impairment: A vignette-based survey study involving 955 students at 9 medical schools. Compr. Psychiatry 46(3), 229–237 (2005)
Rose, G.L., Brown, R.E.: The impaired anesthesiologist: Not just about drugs and alcohol anymore. J. Clin. Anesth. 22, 179–384 (2010)
Rosenstein, A.H., Russell, H., Lauve, R.: Disruptive physician behavior contributes to nursing shortage. Physician Exec. 28(6), 8–11 (2002)
Rosenstein, A.H.: Nurse-physician relationship: Impact on nurse satisfaction and retention. Am. J. Nurs. 102(6), 26–34 (2002)
Rosenstein, A.H., O’Daniel, M.: A survey of the impact of disruptive behaviors and communication defects on patient safety. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 34(8), 464–471 (2008a)
Rosenstein, A.H., O’Daniel, M.: Managing disruptive physician behavior: Impact on staff relationships and patient care. Neurology 70(17), 1564–1570 (2008b)
Rosenstein, A.H.: The quality and economic impact of disruptive behaviors on clinical outcomes of patient care. Am. J. Med. Qual. 26(5), 372–379 (2011)
Rosenstein, A.H., Naylor, B.: Incidence and impact of physician and nurse disruptive behaviors in the emergency room. J. Emerg. Med. (March 19 published online ahead of print, 2011)
Schwenk, T.L., Gorenflo, D.W., Leja, L.M.: A survey on the impact of being depressed on the professional status and mental health care of physicians. J. Clin. Psychiatry 69(4), 617–620 (2008)
Shore, J.H.: The Oregon experience with impaired physicians on probation: An eight-year follow-up. JAMA 257(21), 2931–2934 (1987)
Stelfox, H.T., Ghandi, T.K., Orav, J., et al.: The relation of patient satisfaction with complaints against physicians, risk management episodes and malpractice lawsuits. Am. J. Med. 118(10), 1126–1133 (2005)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, vol. 1. http://oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k9NSDUH/2k9ResultsP.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2011
Wall, B.W.: Commentary: The clinical implications of doctors evaluating doctors. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 33, 89–9 (2005)
Waters, T.M., Parsons, J., Warnecke, R., et al.: How useful is the information provided by the National Practitioner Data Bank? Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Saf. 29, 416–4 (2003)
Wettstein, R.M.: Commentary: Quality improvement and psychiatric fitness-for-duty evaluations of physicians. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 33, 92–94 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Price, M., Meyer, D.J. (2013). Fitness-for-Duty Evaluations of Physicians and Health Care Professionals: Treating Providers and Protecting the Public. In: Gold, L., Vanderpool, D. (eds) Clinical Guide to Mental Disability Evaluations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5447-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5447-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5446-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5447-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)