Skip to main content

Transition to Short-Term Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Transportation Planning in the United States
  • 1642 Accesses

Abstract

As planning for the Interstate Highway System was being completed, attention turned to increasing the productivity and efficiency of existing facilities. In planning for major new regional transportation facilities, many urban areas had neglected maintaining and upgrading other facilities. However, environmental concerns, the difficulty of building inner city freeways, renewed interest in urban mass transit and the energy crisis gave added impetus to the focus on more immediate problems. Signs were becoming evident of the changing emphasis to shorter-term time horizons and the corridor level in transportation planning. Gradually, planning shifted towards maximizing the use of the existing system with a minimum of new construction. Further, the connection was strengthened between long-term planning and the programming of projects (Weiner 1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Public Transit Association, 1989, 1989 Transit Fact Book, Washington, D.C., August

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrillaga, Bert, 1978, “Transportation Pricing Program of the Urban Mass Transportation Administration,” Urban Economics: Proceedings of Five Workshops on Pricing Alternatives, Economic Regulation, Labor Issues, Marketing, and Government Financing Responsibilities, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. March, pp. 13-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur Andersen & Co., 1973, Project FARE, Urban Mass Transportation Industry Reporting System,, (Volumes I - V), U.S. Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington, D.C., November

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, Arnold J., Michael B. Gerard and William H. Crowell, 1982, The Interstate Highway Trade-In Process (2 vols.), Polytechnic Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY. December

    Google Scholar 

  • Calongne, Kathleen, 2003, Problems Associated With Traffic Calming Devices. Seconds Count, Boulder, CO, January

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Systematics, et. al., 1992, Characteristics of Urban Transportation Systems, Revised Edition, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., September

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles River Associates, Inc., 1988, Characteristics of Urban Transportation Demand: An Update, U.S. Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration , Washington, D.C., July

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Leon Monroe, ed., 1968, Tomorrow’s Transportation: New Systems for the Urban Future, prepared by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. May

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Norman L. and John O. Hidinger, 1980, “Integration of Air Quality and Transportation Planning,” Transportation and the 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamant, E.S., et al, 1976, Light Rail Transit: State of the Art Review, De Leuw, Cather & Co. Chicago, IL. Spring

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, Reid, 1999, Traffic Calming: State of Practice, Institute of Transportation Engineers and U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. August

    Google Scholar 

  • Heanue, Kevin E., 1977, “Changing Emphasis in Urban Transportation Planning,” presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Board, Washington, D.C. January

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, Thomas J., 1986, “Road Pricing Attempts in the United States,” Transportation Research: Part A, Pergamon Press, London, England, Vol. 20A, No. 2, March, pp. 145-150

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Traffic Engineers, 1965, Capacities and Limitations of Urban Transportation Modes, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2003, Trip Generation, 7th Edition, Washington, DC, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Transportation Engineers. 1991, Trip Generation, Fifth Edition, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987, Trip Generation Fourth Edition, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1982, Trip Generation, An Informational Report, Third Edition, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1979, Trip Generation, An Informational Report, Second Edition, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1976, Trip Generation, An Informational Report, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulash, Damian, 1974, Congestion Pricing: A Research Summary, The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., July

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R.B., W. Kudlick, J.C. Falcocchio, E.J. Cantilli. and A. Stefanivk, 1978, Review of Local Alternatives Analyses Involving Automated Guideway Transit, Urbitran Associates, New York, NY. February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Herbert S., 1979, Characteristics of Urban Transportation Demand - Appendix, Wilbur Smith and Associates, for U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., January

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Herbert S., 1978, Characteristics of Urban Transportation Demand - A Handbook for Transportation Planners, Wilbur Smith and Associates, for U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., April

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieb, Robert C., 1976, Labor in the Transit Industry, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, May

    Google Scholar 

  • Lookwood, Ian, 1997, “ITE Traffic Calming Definition,” ITE Journal, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, July

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabee, Nancy and Barbara A. Zumwalt, 1977, Review of Downtown People Mover Proposals: Preliminary Market Implications for Downtown Application of Automated Guideway Transit, The Mitre Corporation, McLean, VA. December

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, Richard H., et. al., 2000, Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes - Interim Handbook, Transit Cooperative Research Program Web Document 12, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, Richard H., and John H. Copple, 1981, Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, (Second Edition), Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., for U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, July

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, Richard H., Neil Pedersen and J. Mather, 1977, Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes - A Handbook for Transportation Planners: Edition I, R.H. Pratt Associates, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. February

    Google Scholar 

  • Reno, Arlee, Richard Kuzmyak and Bruce Douglas, 2002, Characteristics of Urban Travel Demand, Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 73, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, David, and T. Reynen, 1974, Characteristics of Urban Transportation Systems: A Handbook for Transportation Planners, DeLeuw, Cather and Co., U.S. Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration , Washington, D.C., May

    Google Scholar 

  • Silken, Joseph S. and Jeffery G. Mora, 1975, “North American Light Rail Vehicles,” Light Rail Transit, Special Report 161, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, Bruce, et al. 1981, Service and Methods Demonstrations Program Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington, D.C. December

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, Bruce, et al., 1979, Service and Methods Demonstration Program Annual Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington, D.C. August

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board, 1985a, Light Rail Transit: System Design for Cost-Effectiveness, State-of-the-Art Report 2, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board, 1982a, Light Rail Transit: Planning, Design and Implementation, Transportation Research Board Special Report 195, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board, 1978, Light Rail Transit: Planning and Technology, Transportation Research Board Special Report 182, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board, 1977, Urban Transportation Alternatives: Evolution of Federal Policy, Transportation Research Board Special Report 177, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board, 1975a, A Review of Urban Mass Transportation Guidelines for Evaluation of Urban Transportation Alternatives, A Report on the Conference on Evaluation of Urban Mass Transportation Alternatives, Transportation Research Board Washington D.C., February 23-26

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board, 1975b, Light Rail Transit, Transportation Research Board Special Report 161, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Systems Center, 1977, Light Rail Transit: State of the Art Review, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington. D.C. May

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1975, Automated Guideway Transit - An Assessment of PRT and Other New Systems, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. June

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1983b, ACT Socio-Economic Research Program Digest, Washington, D.C. March

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Federal Highway Administration and Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1981b, Air Quality Conformity and Priority Procedures for Use in Federal-Aid Highway and Federally-Funded Transit Programs, Federal Register, Vol. 46, No. 16, pp. 8426-32. January 26

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1981d, National Urban Mass Transportation Statistics: First Annual Report, Section 15 Reporting System, Washington, D.C., May

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, 1979c, Energy Conservation in Transportation, Washington, D.C. January

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1978a, Policy Toward Rail Transit, Federal Register, Vol. 43, No. 45, pp. 9428-30. March 7

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, 1977c, National Transportation Trends and Choices - To The Year 2000, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, January 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1977d, Urban Mass Transportation Industry Uniform System of Accounts and Records and Reporting System, General Description, (Volume 1), Washington, D.C., January 10

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1977e, Uniform System of Accounts and Records and Reporting System, Federal Register, Vol. 42, No. 13, pp. 3772-79. January 19

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, 1976a, Urban System Study, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Urban Mass Transportation Administration), 1976b, Major Urban Mass Transportation Investments, Federal Register, Vol. 4l, No. 185, pp. 41512-14. September 22

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Federal Highway Administration and Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1975a, Planning Assistance and Standards, Federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 181, pp. 42976-84. September 17

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1975c, Major Mass Transportation Investments, (Proposed Policy), Federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 149, pp. 32546-47, August 1

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, 1975d, A Statement of National Transportation Policy (By the Secretary of Transportation), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, September 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, William, 1959, “Economic Justification For Peak-Hour Charges,” Statement to the U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Washington Metropolitan Problems, November 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Peter L. and Edward P. Holland, 1978, “Congestion Pricing: The Example of Singapore,” Urban Economics: Proceedings of Five Workshops on Pricing Alternatives, Economic Regulation, Labor Issues, Marketing, and Government Financing Responsibilities, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. March, pp. 27-30

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Arthur L., Edward Weiner, and John D. Wells, 1974, The Role of Taxicabs in Urban Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation, December

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Edward, 1982, “New Directions for Transportation Policy,” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 48, No. 3, Washington, D.C. Summer

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Edward, 1975c, “The Characteristics, Uses, and Potentials of Taxicab Transportation,” Transportation, Volume 4, No. 4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weiner, E. (2013). Transition to Short-Term Planning. In: Urban Transportation Planning in the United States. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5407-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics