Advertisement

Global Environmental Diplomacy: Comparing and Sharing

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers an overview of global environmental diplomacy (GED) and highlights comparisons and connections that could be utilized in the field of global health diplomacy. It identifies the significant similarities and differences between the two fields and shows why a comparison is useful. It also highlights why health diplomats have to be cautious when making comparisons. It defines and examines the dominant ideas, principles, foreign policy linkage, actors, instruments and processes in GED. It analyses the approaches that have been taken in the field and explores whether or not they can or should be transferred to global health. Lessons that health diplomats might learn from their environmental counterparts are emphasized. The chapter concludes by proposing additional approaches, mechanisms, processes and policies from other fields such as the economy, trade and food and agriculture, which should also be explored for the benefit of global health diplomacy.

Keywords

Global Health Foreign Policy Legal Instrument Global Environmental Facility Scientific Consensus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Interfaith Partnership. (2010). A time for inspired leadership and action. http://www.­faithchallengeg8.com/pdfs/2010%20Interfaith%20Statement%20-%20English.pdf Accessed 9.25.12.
  2. Abbott, F. M. (2000). The NAFTA and the legalization of world politics. International Organization, 54, 519–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aginam, O. (2005). Global health governance: International law and public health in a divided world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  4. All American Speakers. (n.d.). Environmentally friendly celebrities. http://www.allamericanspeakers.com/Green_Celebrities_&_Green_Speakers.php Accessed on 7.7.10.
  5. Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2007). Contested climate: Competing discourses of planetary management, market efficiency and ecological justice. In M. Pettenger (Ed.), The social construction of climate change (pp. 123–148). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Benedick, R. E. (2007). History of the Montreal protocol. In D. Kaniaru (Ed.), The Montreal protocol: Celebrating 20 years of environmental progress (pp. 43–60). London: Cameron May.Google Scholar
  7. Benner, T., Streck, C., & Witte, J. M. (Eds.). (2003). Progress or peril? Networks and partnerships in global environmental governance: The Post Johannesburg agenda. Washington, DC: Global Public Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2000). Globalization, four paths of internationalization and domestic policy change: The case of ecoforestry in British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 67–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2004, March 17). The two-level logic of non-state global governance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
  10. Biermann, F., & Bauer, S. (Eds.). (2005). A world environmental organization: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  11. Chasek, P. S. (2001). Earth negotiations: Analyzing thirty years of environmental diplomacy. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, A. M., Friedman, E., & Hochstetler, K. (1998). The sovereign limits of global civil society: A comparison of NGO participation in UN world conferences on the environment, women, and human rights. World Politics, 51(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collin, J., & Lee, K. (2009). Globalisation and the politics of health governance: The framework convention on tobacco control. In A. F. Cooper & J. J. Kirton (Eds.), Innovation in global health governance: Critical cases (pp. 219–241). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, A. F. (2008). Celebrity diplomacy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Costello, A., Abbas, M., Allen, A., Ball, S., Bell., S., et al. (2009). Managing the health effects of climate change. The Lancet, 373(9676), 1693–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fidler, D. (2008, March). World Health Organization’s Framework Convention for Tobacco Control. American Society of International Law. http://www.asil.org/insigh100.cfm Accessed 9.23.12.
  17. Finger, M., & Princen, T. (1994). Environmental NGOs in world politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hale, T. N., & Mauzerall, D. L. (2004). Thinking globally and acting locally: Can the Johannesburg partnerships coordinate action on sustainable development? Journal of Environment and Development, 13(3), 220–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunter, D. (1999, June). Global environmental protection in the 21st century. Foreign Policy in Focus. http://www.fpif.org/articles/global_environmental_protection_in_the_21st_century. Accessed 9.23.12.
  20. Iaffaldano, A. (2006). Bono’s (Red) campaign is cross-media magic. Reprise Media, [internet] 13 October. http://www.reprisemedia.com/searchviews/2006/10/bonos-red-campaign-is-cross-media-magic/ Accessed 7.7.10.
  21. Joyner, C. C. (2005). Rethinking international environmental regimes: What role for partnership coalitions? Journal of International Law and International Relations, 1(2), 89–120.Google Scholar
  22. Kelley, J. R. (2010). The new diplomacy: Evolution of a revolution. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 21(2), 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kennan, G. (1970, April). To prevent a world wasteland: A proposal. Foreign Affairs, 48, 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirton, J., & Guebert, J. (2007). Compliance with climate change commitments: The G8 record, 1975–2007. G8 Information Centre. http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/evaluations/compliance-climate.html Accessed 7.7.10.
  25. Kirton, J. J., & Guebert, J. M. (2010a). The climate change-health connection: Compounding challenges for scholars and practitioners. G8 Information Centre. http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/scholar/kirton-guebert-isa-100217.pdf Accessed 7.7.10.
  26. Kirton, J. J., & Guebert, J. M. (2010b). Soft law regulatory cooperation and convergence in North America. In M. Gattinger & G. Hale (Eds.), Border and bridges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kirton, J., & Hajnal, P. (Eds.). (2006). Sustainability, civil society and international governance: Local, regional and global perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  28. Kirton, J., & Trebilcock, M. (Eds.). (2004). Hard choices, soft law: Voluntary standards in global trade, environment and social governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. Kirton, J., et al. (2010). Health compliance in the G8 and APEC: The World Health Organization’s role. In J. J. Kirton, M. Larionova, & P. Savona (Eds.), Making global economic governance effective (pp. 217–230). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. Kütting, G. (2000). Environment, society and international relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation. (n.d). About us: Foundation highlights. http://www.­leonardodicaprio.org/aboutus/ Accessed on 7.7.10.
  32. Ogilvie, K. (2006). The emergence of environmental movement-government partnerships. In J. Kirton & P. Hajnal (Eds.), Sustainability, civil society and international governance: Local regional and global perspectives (pp. 89–95). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  33. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hanson C. E. (Eds.). (2007). Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/­publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/contents.html Accessed 9.25.12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roemer, R., Taylor, A., & Lariviere, J. (2005). Origins of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health, 95(6), 936–938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Streck, C. (2004). New partnerships in global environmental policy: The clean development mechanism. The Journal of Environment Development, 13(3), 295–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strong, M. (2001). Where on Earth are we going? Mason: Thomson/Texere.Google Scholar
  37. Susskind, L. (1994). Environmental diplomacy: Negotiating more effective global agreements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tarasofsky, R. (2005, June). Report on trade, environment, and intellectual property rights. Chatham House. http://www.iprsonline.org/resources/docs/Tarasofsky-CATE-IPRs.pdf Accessed 7.7.10.
  39. Taylor, A. (1996). An international regulatory strategy for global tobacco control. Yale Journal of International Law, 21(2), 257–304.Google Scholar
  40. Taylor, A., & Roemer, R. (1996). An international strategy for tobacco control. Unpublished document WHO/PSA/96.6. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  41. Tolba, M. K., & Rummel-Bulska, I. (1998). Global environmental diplomacy: Negotiating environmental agreements for the world 1973–1992. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Usui, M. (2004). The private business sector in global environmental diplomacy. In N. Kani & P. M. Haas (Eds.), Emerging forces in environmental governance (pp. 216–259). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Vaillancourt, J. G. (1995). Sustainable development: A sociologist’s view of the definition, origins and implications of the concept. In M. D. Meha & E. Ouellet (Eds.), Environmental sociology: Theory and practice (pp. 219–230). Toronto: Captus Press.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Bernstein, S. (2001). The compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cooper, A. F., & Kirton, J. (2009). Innovation in global health governance: Critical cases. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Harris, P. (2001). International equity and global environmental politics: Power and principles in U.S. Foreign Policy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global Health Diplomacy ProgramTrinity College, University of Toronto, Munk School of Global AffairsTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations