Global Environmental Diplomacy: Comparing and Sharing
This chapter offers an overview of global environmental diplomacy (GED) and highlights comparisons and connections that could be utilized in the field of global health diplomacy. It identifies the significant similarities and differences between the two fields and shows why a comparison is useful. It also highlights why health diplomats have to be cautious when making comparisons. It defines and examines the dominant ideas, principles, foreign policy linkage, actors, instruments and processes in GED. It analyses the approaches that have been taken in the field and explores whether or not they can or should be transferred to global health. Lessons that health diplomats might learn from their environmental counterparts are emphasized. The chapter concludes by proposing additional approaches, mechanisms, processes and policies from other fields such as the economy, trade and food and agriculture, which should also be explored for the benefit of global health diplomacy.
KeywordsGlobal Health Foreign Policy Legal Instrument Global Environmental Facility Scientific Consensus
- Interfaith Partnership. (2010). A time for inspired leadership and action. http://www.faithchallengeg8.com/pdfs/2010%20Interfaith%20Statement%20-%20English.pdf Accessed 9.25.12.
- Aginam, O. (2005). Global health governance: International law and public health in a divided world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- All American Speakers. (n.d.). Environmentally friendly celebrities. http://www.allamericanspeakers.com/Green_Celebrities_&_Green_Speakers.php Accessed on 7.7.10.
- Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2007). Contested climate: Competing discourses of planetary management, market efficiency and ecological justice. In M. Pettenger (Ed.), The social construction of climate change (pp. 123–148). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Benedick, R. E. (2007). History of the Montreal protocol. In D. Kaniaru (Ed.), The Montreal protocol: Celebrating 20 years of environmental progress (pp. 43–60). London: Cameron May.Google Scholar
- Benner, T., Streck, C., & Witte, J. M. (Eds.). (2003). Progress or peril? Networks and partnerships in global environmental governance: The Post Johannesburg agenda. Washington, DC: Global Public Policy Institute.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2004, March 17). The two-level logic of non-state global governance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
- Biermann, F., & Bauer, S. (Eds.). (2005). A world environmental organization: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Chasek, P. S. (2001). Earth negotiations: Analyzing thirty years of environmental diplomacy. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
- Collin, J., & Lee, K. (2009). Globalisation and the politics of health governance: The framework convention on tobacco control. In A. F. Cooper & J. J. Kirton (Eds.), Innovation in global health governance: Critical cases (pp. 219–241). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Cooper, A. F. (2008). Celebrity diplomacy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
- Fidler, D. (2008, March). World Health Organization’s Framework Convention for Tobacco Control. American Society of International Law. http://www.asil.org/insigh100.cfm Accessed 9.23.12.
- Finger, M., & Princen, T. (1994). Environmental NGOs in world politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hunter, D. (1999, June). Global environmental protection in the 21st century. Foreign Policy in Focus. http://www.fpif.org/articles/global_environmental_protection_in_the_21st_century. Accessed 9.23.12.
- Iaffaldano, A. (2006). Bono’s (Red) campaign is cross-media magic. Reprise Media, [internet] 13 October. http://www.reprisemedia.com/searchviews/2006/10/bonos-red-campaign-is-cross-media-magic/ Accessed 7.7.10.
- Joyner, C. C. (2005). Rethinking international environmental regimes: What role for partnership coalitions? Journal of International Law and International Relations, 1(2), 89–120.Google Scholar
- Kirton, J., & Guebert, J. (2007). Compliance with climate change commitments: The G8 record, 1975–2007. G8 Information Centre. http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/evaluations/compliance-climate.html Accessed 7.7.10.
- Kirton, J. J., & Guebert, J. M. (2010a). The climate change-health connection: Compounding challenges for scholars and practitioners. G8 Information Centre. http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/scholar/kirton-guebert-isa-100217.pdf Accessed 7.7.10.
- Kirton, J. J., & Guebert, J. M. (2010b). Soft law regulatory cooperation and convergence in North America. In M. Gattinger & G. Hale (Eds.), Border and bridges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kirton, J., & Hajnal, P. (Eds.). (2006). Sustainability, civil society and international governance: Local, regional and global perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Kirton, J., & Trebilcock, M. (Eds.). (2004). Hard choices, soft law: Voluntary standards in global trade, environment and social governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Kirton, J., et al. (2010). Health compliance in the G8 and APEC: The World Health Organization’s role. In J. J. Kirton, M. Larionova, & P. Savona (Eds.), Making global economic governance effective (pp. 217–230). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Kütting, G. (2000). Environment, society and international relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation. (n.d). About us: Foundation highlights. http://www.leonardodicaprio.org/aboutus/ Accessed on 7.7.10.
- Ogilvie, K. (2006). The emergence of environmental movement-government partnerships. In J. Kirton & P. Hajnal (Eds.), Sustainability, civil society and international governance: Local regional and global perspectives (pp. 89–95). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hanson C. E. (Eds.). (2007). Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/contents.html Accessed 9.25.12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strong, M. (2001). Where on Earth are we going? Mason: Thomson/Texere.Google Scholar
- Susskind, L. (1994). Environmental diplomacy: Negotiating more effective global agreements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Tarasofsky, R. (2005, June). Report on trade, environment, and intellectual property rights. Chatham House. http://www.iprsonline.org/resources/docs/Tarasofsky-CATE-IPRs.pdf Accessed 7.7.10.
- Taylor, A. (1996). An international regulatory strategy for global tobacco control. Yale Journal of International Law, 21(2), 257–304.Google Scholar
- Taylor, A., & Roemer, R. (1996). An international strategy for tobacco control. Unpublished document WHO/PSA/96.6. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- Tolba, M. K., & Rummel-Bulska, I. (1998). Global environmental diplomacy: Negotiating environmental agreements for the world 1973–1992. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Usui, M. (2004). The private business sector in global environmental diplomacy. In N. Kani & P. M. Haas (Eds.), Emerging forces in environmental governance (pp. 216–259). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
- Vaillancourt, J. G. (1995). Sustainable development: A sociologist’s view of the definition, origins and implications of the concept. In M. D. Meha & E. Ouellet (Eds.), Environmental sociology: Theory and practice (pp. 219–230). Toronto: Captus Press.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, S. (2001). The compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Cooper, A. F., & Kirton, J. (2009). Innovation in global health governance: Critical cases. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Harris, P. (2001). International equity and global environmental politics: Power and principles in U.S. Foreign Policy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar