Skip to main content

Global Environmental Diplomacy: Comparing and Sharing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Health Diplomacy

Abstract

This chapter offers an overview of global environmental diplomacy (GED) and highlights comparisons and connections that could be utilized in the field of global health diplomacy. It identifies the significant similarities and differences between the two fields and shows why a comparison is useful. It also highlights why health diplomats have to be cautious when making comparisons. It defines and examines the dominant ideas, principles, foreign policy linkage, actors, instruments and processes in GED. It analyses the approaches that have been taken in the field and explores whether or not they can or should be transferred to global health. Lessons that health diplomats might learn from their environmental counterparts are emphasized. The chapter concludes by proposing additional approaches, mechanisms, processes and policies from other fields such as the economy, trade and food and agriculture, which should also be explored for the benefit of global health diplomacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Interfaith Partnership. (2010). A time for inspired leadership and action. http://www.­faithchallengeg8.com/pdfs/2010%20Interfaith%20Statement%20-%20English.pdf Accessed 9.25.12.

  • Abbott, F. M. (2000). The NAFTA and the legalization of world politics. International Organization, 54, 519–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aginam, O. (2005). Global health governance: International law and public health in a divided world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • All American Speakers. (n.d.). Environmentally friendly celebrities. http://www.allamericanspeakers.com/Green_Celebrities_&_Green_Speakers.php Accessed on 7.7.10.

  • Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2007). Contested climate: Competing discourses of planetary management, market efficiency and ecological justice. In M. Pettenger (Ed.), The social construction of climate change (pp. 123–148). London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedick, R. E. (2007). History of the Montreal protocol. In D. Kaniaru (Ed.), The Montreal protocol: Celebrating 20 years of environmental progress (pp. 43–60). London: Cameron May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, T., Streck, C., & Witte, J. M. (Eds.). (2003). Progress or peril? Networks and partnerships in global environmental governance: The Post Johannesburg agenda. Washington, DC: Global Public Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2000). Globalization, four paths of internationalization and domestic policy change: The case of ecoforestry in British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 67–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2004, March 17). The two-level logic of non-state global governance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., & Bauer, S. (Eds.). (2005). A world environmental organization: Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasek, P. S. (2001). Earth negotiations: Analyzing thirty years of environmental diplomacy. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. M., Friedman, E., & Hochstetler, K. (1998). The sovereign limits of global civil society: A comparison of NGO participation in UN world conferences on the environment, women, and human rights. World Politics, 51(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, J., & Lee, K. (2009). Globalisation and the politics of health governance: The framework convention on tobacco control. In A. F. Cooper & J. J. Kirton (Eds.), Innovation in global health governance: Critical cases (pp. 219–241). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. F. (2008). Celebrity diplomacy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A., Abbas, M., Allen, A., Ball, S., Bell., S., et al. (2009). Managing the health effects of climate change. The Lancet, 373(9676), 1693–1733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, D. (2008, March). World Health Organization’s Framework Convention for Tobacco Control. American Society of International Law. http://www.asil.org/insigh100.cfm Accessed 9.23.12.

  • Finger, M., & Princen, T. (1994). Environmental NGOs in world politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T. N., & Mauzerall, D. L. (2004). Thinking globally and acting locally: Can the Johannesburg partnerships coordinate action on sustainable development? Journal of Environment and Development, 13(3), 220–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, D. (1999, June). Global environmental protection in the 21st century. Foreign Policy in Focus. http://www.fpif.org/articles/global_environmental_protection_in_the_21st_century. Accessed 9.23.12.

  • Iaffaldano, A. (2006). Bono’s (Red) campaign is cross-media magic. Reprise Media, [internet] 13 October. http://www.reprisemedia.com/searchviews/2006/10/bonos-red-campaign-is-cross-media-magic/ Accessed 7.7.10.

  • Joyner, C. C. (2005). Rethinking international environmental regimes: What role for partnership coalitions? Journal of International Law and International Relations, 1(2), 89–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. R. (2010). The new diplomacy: Evolution of a revolution. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 21(2), 286–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennan, G. (1970, April). To prevent a world wasteland: A proposal. Foreign Affairs, 48, 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, J., & Guebert, J. (2007). Compliance with climate change commitments: The G8 record, 1975–2007. G8 Information Centre. http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/evaluations/compliance-climate.html Accessed 7.7.10.

  • Kirton, J. J., & Guebert, J. M. (2010a). The climate change-health connection: Compounding challenges for scholars and practitioners. G8 Information Centre. http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/scholar/kirton-guebert-isa-100217.pdf Accessed 7.7.10.

  • Kirton, J. J., & Guebert, J. M. (2010b). Soft law regulatory cooperation and convergence in North America. In M. Gattinger & G. Hale (Eds.), Border and bridges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, J., & Hajnal, P. (Eds.). (2006). Sustainability, civil society and international governance: Local, regional and global perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, J., & Trebilcock, M. (Eds.). (2004). Hard choices, soft law: Voluntary standards in global trade, environment and social governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, J., et al. (2010). Health compliance in the G8 and APEC: The World Health Organization’s role. In J. J. Kirton, M. Larionova, & P. Savona (Eds.), Making global economic governance effective (pp. 217–230). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kütting, G. (2000). Environment, society and international relations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation. (n.d). About us: Foundation highlights. http://www.­leonardodicaprio.org/aboutus/ Accessed on 7.7.10.

  • Ogilvie, K. (2006). The emergence of environmental movement-government partnerships. In J. Kirton & P. Hajnal (Eds.), Sustainability, civil society and international governance: Local regional and global perspectives (pp. 89–95). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hanson C. E. (Eds.). (2007). Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/­publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/contents.html Accessed 9.25.12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, R., Taylor, A., & Lariviere, J. (2005). Origins of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health, 95(6), 936–938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Streck, C. (2004). New partnerships in global environmental policy: The clean development mechanism. The Journal of Environment Development, 13(3), 295–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, M. (2001). Where on Earth are we going? Mason: Thomson/Texere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. (1994). Environmental diplomacy: Negotiating more effective global agreements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarasofsky, R. (2005, June). Report on trade, environment, and intellectual property rights. Chatham House. http://www.iprsonline.org/resources/docs/Tarasofsky-CATE-IPRs.pdf Accessed 7.7.10.

  • Taylor, A. (1996). An international regulatory strategy for global tobacco control. Yale Journal of International Law, 21(2), 257–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Roemer, R. (1996). An international strategy for tobacco control. Unpublished document WHO/PSA/96.6. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolba, M. K., & Rummel-Bulska, I. (1998). Global environmental diplomacy: Negotiating environmental agreements for the world 1973–1992. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usui, M. (2004). The private business sector in global environmental diplomacy. In N. Kani & P. M. Haas (Eds.), Emerging forces in environmental governance (pp. 216–259). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, J. G. (1995). Sustainable development: A sociologist’s view of the definition, origins and implications of the concept. In M. D. Meha & E. Ouellet (Eds.), Environmental sociology: Theory and practice (pp. 219–230). Toronto: Captus Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Bernstein, S. (2001). The compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. F., & Kirton, J. (2009). Innovation in global health governance: Critical cases. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (2001). International equity and global environmental politics: Power and principles in U.S. Foreign Policy. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John J. Kirton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kirton, J.J., Guebert, J.M. (2013). Global Environmental Diplomacy: Comparing and Sharing. In: Kickbusch, I., Lister, G., Told, M., Drager, N. (eds) Global Health Diplomacy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5401-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5401-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5400-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5401-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics