Data-based Computational Approaches to Forecasting Political Violence

  • Philip A. Schrodt
  • James Yonamine
  • Benjamin E. Bagozzi
Chapter

Abstract

The challenge of terrorism dates back centuries if not millennia. Until recently, the basic approaches to analyzing terrorism—historical analogy and monitoring the contemporary words and deeds of potential perpetrators—have changed little: the Roman authorities warily observing the Zealots in first-century Jerusalem could have easily traded places with the Roman authorities combatting the Red Brigades in twentieth century Italy.

Keywords

Placebo Europe Transportation Income Liner 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation, SES-1004414, and by a Fulbright-Hays Research Fellowship for work by Schrodt at the Peace Research Institute, Oslo (http://www.prio.no).

References

  1. 1.
    Abbott A (1995) Sequence analysis: new methods for old ideas. Ann Rev Sociol 21:93–113Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdi H, Williams LJ (2010) Principal components analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev 2(4): 433–459Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Achen C (2002) Toward a new political methodology: microfoundations and ART. Ann Rev Pol Sci 5:423–450Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andriole SJ, Hopple GW (1984) The rise and fall of events data: from basic research to applied use in the U.S. Department of Defense. Int Interact 10(3/4):293–309Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Asal V, Pate A, Wilkenfeld J (2008) Minorities at risk organizational behavior data and codebook version 9–2008. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/data.asp
  7. 7.
    Azad S, Gupta A (2011) A quantitative assessment on 26/11 mumbai attack using social network analysis. J Terror Res 2(2):4–14Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Azar EE (1980) The conflict and peace data bank (COPDAB) project. J Confl Resolut 24: 143–152Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Azar EE, Sloan T (1975) Dimensions of interaction. University Center for International Studies, University of Pittsburgh, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beck N, Katz. JN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time- series cross-section data. Am Pol Sci Rev 89:634–634Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beck N, Katz JN, Tucker R (1998) Taking time seriously: time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. Am J Pol Sci 42(4):1260–1288Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beck N, King G, Zeng L (2000) Improving quantitative studies of international conflict: a conjecture. Am Pol Sci Rev 94(1):21–35Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beger A, DeMeritt JH, Hwang W, Moore WH (2011) The split population logit (spoplogit): modeling measurement bias in binary data. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1773594. Working paper
  14. 14.
    Benini AA, Moulton LH (2004) Civilian victims in an asymmetrical conflict: operation enduring freedom, afghanistan. J Peace Res 41(4):403–422Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bennett DS, Stam AC (2004) The behavioral origins of war. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berk R (2009) The role of race in forecasts of violent crime. Race Soc Probl 1(4):231–242Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berk R, Sherman L, barnes G, Kurtz E, Ahlman L (2007) Forecasting murder within a population of probationers and parolees: A high stakes application of statistical learning. J R Stat Soc 172(1):191–211Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Besley T, Persson T (2009) Repression or civil war? Am Econ Rev 99(2):292–297Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 2:993–1022Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bond D, Jenkins JC, Taylor CLT, Schock K (1997) Mapping mass political conflict and civil society: Issues and prospects for the automated development of event data. J Confl Resolut 41(4):553–579Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bond J, Petroff V, O’Brien S, Bond D (2004) Forecasting turmoil in Indonesia: an application of hidden Markov models. Presented at the International Studies Association Meetings, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Box GE, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC (1994) Time series analysis: forecasting and control, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Box-Steffensmeier J, Reiter D, Zorn C (2003) Nonproportional hazards and event history analysis in international relations. J Confl Resolut 47(1):33–53Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Box-Steffensmeier JM, Jones BS (2004) Event history modeling: a guide for social scientists. Analytical methods for social research. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brandt PT, Colaresi MP, Freeman JR (2008) The dynamics of reciprocity, accountability and credibility. J Confl Resolut 52(3):343–374Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brandt PT, Freeman JR (2006) Advances in Bayesian time series modeling and the study of politics: Theory testing, forecasting, and policy analysis. Pol Anal 14(1):1–36Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brandt PT, Freeman JR, Schrodt PA (2011) Real time, time series forecasting of inter- and intra-state political conflict. Confl Manage Peace Sci 28(1):41–64Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brandt PT, Sandler T (2009) Hostage taking: understanding terrorism event dynamics. J Policy Model 31(5):758–778Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brandt PT, Sandler T (2010) What do transnational terrorists target? Has it changed? Are we safer? J Confl Resolut 54(2):214–236Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brandt PT, Williams JT (2007) Multiple time series models. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brochet J, Marie-Paule-Lefrance, Guidicelli V (2008) Imgt/v-quest: the highly customized and integrated system for ig and tr standardized v-j and v-d-j sequence analysis. Nucl Acids Res 36:387–395Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brown D, Dalton J, Hoyle H (2004) Spatial forecast methods for terrorist events in urban environments. Intell Secur Inform 3073:426–435Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buhaug H (2006) Relative capability and rebel objective in civil war. J Peace Res 43(6): 691–708Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Buhaug H, Lujala P (2005) Accounting for scale: measuring geography in quantitative studies of civil war. Pol Geogr 24(4):399–418Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Buhaug H, Rod JK (2006) Local determinants of African civil wars, 1970–2001. Pol Geogr 25(6):315–335Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Burgess PM, Lawton RW (1972) Indicators of international behavior: an assessment of events data research. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cederman LE, Gleditsch KS (2009) Introduction to special issue of “disaggregating civil war”. J Confl Res 24(4):590–617Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Choi K, Asal V, Wilkenfeld J, Pattipati KR (2012) Forecasting the use of violence by ethno-political organizations: middle eastern minorities and the choice of violence. In: Subrahmanian V (ed) Handbook on computational approaches to counterterrorism. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Choucri N, Robinson TW (eds) (1979) Forecasting in international relations: theory, methods, problems, prospects. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Clark DH, Regan PM (2003) Opportunities to fight: a statistical technique for modeling unobservable phenomena. J Confl Resolut 47(1):94–115Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cunningham DE (2011) Barriers to Peace in Civil War. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cunningham DE, Gleditsch KS, Salehyan I (2009) It takes two: a dyadic analysis of civil war duration and outcome. J Confl Resolut 53(4):570–597Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cutler DR, Edwards TC Jr, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler J (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88(11):2783–2792Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Daly JA, Andriole SJ (1980) The use of events/interaction research by the intelligence community. Policy Sci 12:215–236Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Davies JL, Gurr TR (eds) (1998) Preventive measures: building risk assessment and crisis early warning. Rowman and Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dereux J, Haeberli P, Smithies O (1984) A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the vax. Nucl Acids Res 12(1):387–395Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Desmarais BA, Cranmar SJ (2011) Forecasting the locational dynamics of transnational terrorism: a network analysis approach. In: Paper presented at the 2011 European Intelligence and Security Conference, Athens. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6061174&tag=1
  48. 48.
    Dickerson JP, Simari GI, Subrahmanian VS (2012) Using temporal probabilistic rules to learn group behavior. In: Subrahmanian V (ed) Handbook on computational approaches to counterterrorism. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    D’Orazio V, Landis ST, Palmer G, Schrodt PA (2011) Separating the wheat from the chaff: application of support vector machines to mid4 text classification. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the midwest political science association, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    D’Orazio V, Yonamine J, Schrodt PA (2011) Predicting intra-state conflict onset: an events data approach using euclidean and levenshtein distance measures. Presented at the midwest political science association, Chicago. Available at http://eventdata.psu.edu
  51. 51.
    Duval RD, Thompson WR (1980) Reconsidering the aggregate relationship between size, economic development, and some types of foreign policy behavior. Am J Pol Sci 24(3): 511–525Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Enders W, Parise GF, Sandler T (1992) A time-series analyssis of transnational terrorism. Def Peace Econ 3(4):305–320Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Enders W, Sandler T (1993) The effectiveness of anti-terrorism policies: a vector-autoregression-intervention analysis. Am Pol Sci Rev 87(4):829–844Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Enders W, Sandler T (2000) Is transnational terrorism becoming more threatening? A time-series investigation. J Confl Resolut 44(3):307–332Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Enders W, Sandler T (2005) After 9/11: is it all different now? J Confl Resolut 49(2):259–277Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Enders W, Sandler T (2006) Distribution of transnational terrorism among countries by income classes and geography after 9/11. Int Stud Q 50(2):367–393Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Enders W, Sandler T (2006) The political economy of terrorism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Enders W, Sandler T, Cauley J (1990) Assessing the impact of terrorist-thwarting policies: an intervention time series approach. Def Peace Econ 2(1):1–18Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Enders W, Sandler T, Gaibulloev K (2011) Domestic versus transnational terrorism: Data, decomposition, and dynamics. J Peace Res 48(3):319–337Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Esty DC, Goldstone JA, Gurr TR, Harff B, Levy M, Dabelko GD, Surko P, Unger AN (1998) State failure task force report: phase II findings. Science Applications International Corporation, McLeanGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Esty DC, Goldstone JA, Gurr TR, Surko P, Unger AN (1995) State failure task force report. Science Applications International Corporation, McLeanGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Freedom House (2009) Freedom in the world. http://www.freedomhouse.org/reports
  63. 63.
    Freeman JR (1989) Systematic sampling, temporal aggregation, and the study of political relationships. Pol Anal 1:61–98Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gaddis JL (1992) International relations theory and the end of the cold war. Int Secur 17:5–58Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gaddis JL (1992) The United States and the end of the cold war. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gassebner M, Luechinger S (2011) Lock, stock, and barrel: a comprehensive assessment of the determinants of terror. Public Choice 149:235–261Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gerner DJ, Schrodt PA, Francisco RA, Weddle JL (1994) The machine coding of events from regional and international sources. Int Stud Q 38:91–119Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Gerner DJ, Schrodt PA, Yilmaz Ö (2009) Conflict and mediation event observations (CAMEO) Codebook. http://eventdata.psu.edu/data.dir/cameo.html
  69. 69.
    Ghahramani Z (2004) Unsupervised learning. In: Advanced lectures on machine learning. Springer, Berlin/New York, pp 72–112Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Gill J (1999) The insignificance of null hypothesis significance testing. Pol Res Q 52(3): 647–674Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Gill J (2003) Bayesian methods: a social and behavioral sciences approach. Chapman and Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Gleditsch NP (2012) Special issue: event data. Int Interact 38(4)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Goldstein JS (1992) A conflict-cooperation scale for WEIS events data. J Confl Resolut 36:369–385Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Goldstone JA, Bates R, Epstein DL, Gurr TR, Lustik M, Marshall, MG, Ulfelder J, Woodward M (2010) A global model for forecasting political instability. Am J Pol Sci 54(1):190–208Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Gurr TR, Harff B (1994) Conceptual, research and policy issues in early warning research: an overview. J Ethno-Dev 4(1):3–15Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gurr TR, Lichbach MI (1986) Forecasting internal conflict: A competitive evaluation of empirical theories. Comp Pol Stud 19:3–38Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hämerli A, Gattiker R, Weyermann R (2006) Conflict and cooperation in an actor’s network of Chechnya based on event data. J Confl Resolut 50(159):159–175Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Hamilton J (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Harff B, Gurr TR (2001) Systematic early warning of humanitarian emergencies. J Peace Res 35(5):359–371Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Hegre H, Ellingson T, Gates S, Gleditsch NP (2001) Toward a democratic civil peace? democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816–1992. J Policy Model 95(1):34–48Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hegre H, Ostby G, Raleigh C (2009) Property and civil war: a disaggregated study of liberia. J Confl Resolut 53(4):598–623Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hill DW, Bagozzi BE, Moore WH, Mukherjee B (2011) Strategic incentives and modeling bias in ordinal data:the zero-inflated ordered probit (ziop) model in political science. In: Paper presented at the new faces in political methodology meeting, Penn State, 30 April 2011. http://qssi.psu.edu/files/NF4Hill.pdf
  84. 84.
    Holmes JS, Pineres SAGD, Curtina KM (2007) A subnational study of insurgency: farc violence in the 1990s. Stud Confl Terror 30(3):249–265Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Hopple GW, Andriole SJ, Freedy A (eds) (1984) National security crisis forecasting and management. Westview, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, May S (2008) Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time to event data. Series in probability and statistics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Hudson V (ed) (1991) Artificial intelligence and international politics. Westview, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Hudson VM, Schrodt PA, Whitmer RD (2008) Discrete sequence rule models as a social science methodology: an exploratory analysis of foreign policy rule enactment within Palestinian-Israeli event data. Foreign Policy Anal 4(2):105–126Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    International Monetary Fund. Statistics Dept. (2009) Direction of trade statistics yearbook, 2008. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=22053.0
  90. 90.
    Inyaem U, Meesad P, Haruechaiyasak C (2009) Named-entity techniques for terrorism event extraction and classification. In: Paper presented at the eighth international symposium on natural language processing. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5340924&tag=1
  91. 91.
    Jackman RW, Miller RA (1996) A renaissance of political culture? Am J Pol Sci 40(3): 632–659Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Jackman S (2009) Bayesian analysis for the social sciences. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Jenkins CJ, Bond D (2001) Conflict carrying capacity, political crisis, and reconstruction. J Confl Resolut 45(1):3–31Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Kahneman D (2011) Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Khong YF (1992) Analogies at war. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    King G (1986) How not to lie with statistics: avoiding common mistakes in quantitative political science. Am J Pol Sci 30(3):666–687Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    King G, Zeng L (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data. Pol Anal 9(2):12–54Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Lee K, Booth D, Alam P (2005) A comparison of supervised and unsupervised neural networks in predicting bankruptcy of korean firms. Expert Syst Appl 29:1–16Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Leng RJ (1987) Behavioral correlates of war, 1816–1975. (ICPSR 8606). Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Lewis M (2011) Moneyball. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Lund MS (1996) Preventing violent conflicts: a strategy for preventive diplomacy. United States Institute for Peace, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Malo MA, Munoz-Bullon F (2003) Employment status mobility from a life-cycle perspective: a sequence analysis of work-histories in the bhps. Demogr Res 9:119–162Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Mannes A (2012) Qualitative analysis & computational techniques for the counter-terror analyst. In: Subrahmanian V (ed) Handbook on computational approaches to counterterrorism. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Marshall MG, Jaggers K, Gurr TR (2010) Polity iv project: political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2010. Center for Systemic Peace, Vienna, VAGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Martinez MV, Silva A, Simari GI, Subrahmanian VS (2012) Forecasting changes in terror group behavior. In: Subrahmanian V (ed) Handbook on computational approaches to counterterrorism. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Martinez V, Simari G, Sliva A, Subrahmanian V (2008) Convex: similarity-based algorithms for forecasting group behavior. IEEE Intell Syst 23:51–57Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Martinez V, Simari G, Sliva A, Subrahmanian V (2008) The soma terror organization portal (stop): Social network and analytic tools for the real-time analysis of terror groups. In: Liu H, Salerno JJ, Young M (eds) Social computing, behavioral modeling, and prediction. Springer/Wien, Norderstedt, pp 9–18Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    May ER (1973) “Lessons” of the past: the use and misuse of history in American foreign policy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    McClelland CA (1967) World-event-interaction-survey: a research project on the theory and measurement of international interaction and transaction. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    McClelland CA (1976) World event/interaction survey codebook (ICPSR 5211). Inter-University consortium for political and social research, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Meehl P (1954) Clinical and statistical prediction: a theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Minorities at Risk Project (2009) Minorities at risk dataset. Center for International Development and Conflict Management, College Park. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/
  113. 113.
    Murray MP (1994) A drunk and her dog: an illustration of cointegration and error correction. http://www-stat.wharton.upenn.edu/~steele/Courses/434/434Context/Co-int%egration/Murray93DrunkAndDog.pdfGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) (2011) Global terrorism database [data file]. http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd
  115. 115.
    Neumayer E, Plümper T (2010) Galton’s problem and contagion in international terrorism along civilizational lines. Confl Manage Peace Sci 27(4):308–325Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Neustadt RE, May ER (1986) Thinking in time: the uses of history for decision makers. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    O’Brien S (2012) A multi-method approach for near real time conflict and crisis early warning. In: Subrahmanian V (ed) Handbook on computational approaches to counterterrorism. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    O’Brien SP (2010) Crisis early warning and decision support: Contemporary approaches and thoughts on future research. Int Stud Rev 12(1):87–104Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Öcal N, Yildirim J (2010) Regional effects of terrorism on economic growth in turkey: A geographically weighted regression. J Peace Res 47(4):477–489Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Oskar Engene J (2007) Five decades of terrorism in europe: the tweed dataset. J Peace Res 44(1):109–121Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Pearl J (2009) Understanding propensity scores. In: Causality: models, reasoning, and inference, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Perliger A, Pedahzur A (2011) Social network analysis in the study of terrorism and political violence. Pol Sci Pol 44(1):45–50Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Petroff V, Bond J, Bond D (2012) Using hidden markov models to predict terror before it hits (again). In: Subrahmanian V (ed) Handbook on computational approaches to counterterrorism. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Pevehouse JC, Brozek J (2010) Time series analysis in political science. In: Box-Steffensmeier J, Brady H, Collier D (eds) Oxford handbook of political Methodology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Pevehouse JC, Goldstein JS (1999) Serbian compliance or defiance in Kosovo? Statistical analysis and real-time predictions. J Confl Resolut 43(4):538–546Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Piazza J (2011) Poverty, minority economic discrimination and domestic terrorism. J Peace Res 48(3):339–353Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Piazza J, Walsh JI (2009) Transnational terrorism and human rights. Int Stud Q 53:125–148Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Porter MD, Brown DE (2007) Detecting local regions of change in high-dimensional criminal or terrorist point processes. Comput Stat Data Anal 51(5):2753–2768Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Raleigh C, Linke A, Hegre H, Karlsen J (2010) Introducing ACLED: an armed conflict location and event dataset. J Peace Res 47(5):651–660Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Regan P, Clark D (2010) The institutions and elections project data collection. http://www2.binghamton.edu/political-science/institutions-and-elections%-project.htmlGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Richardson LF (1960) Statistics of deadly quarrels. Quadrangle, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Rupesinghe K, Kuroda M (eds) (1992) Early warning and conflict resolution. St. Martin’s, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Schrodt PA (2000) Pattern recognition of international crises using hidden Markov models. In: Richards D (ed) Political complexity: nonlinear models of politics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 296–328Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Schrodt PA (2004) Detecting united states mediation styles in the middle east, 1979–1998. In: Maoz Z, Mintz A, Morgan TC, Palmer G, Stoll RJ (eds) Multiple paths to knowledge in international relations. Lexington Books, Lexington, pp 99–124Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Schrodt PA (2006) Forecasting conflict in the Balkans using hidden Markov models. In: Trappl R (ed) Programming for peace: computer-aided methods for international conflict resolution and prevention. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 161–184Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Schrodt PA (2007) Inductive event data scaling using item response theory. Presented at the summer meeting of the society of political methodology. Available at http://eventdata.psu.edu
  137. 137.
    Schrodt PA (2010) Seven deadly sins of contemporary quantitative analysis. Presented at the american political science association Meetings, Washington, DC. http://eventdata.psu.edu/papers.dir/Schrodt.7Sins.APSA10.pdf
  138. 138.
    Schrodt PA, Gerner DJ (1994) Validity assessment of a machine-coded event data set for the Middle East, 1982–1992. Am J Pol Sci 38:825–854Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Schrodt PA, Gerner DJ (1997) Empirical indicators of crisis phase in the Middle East, 1979–1995. J Confl Resolut 25(4):803–817Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Schrodt PA, Gerner DJ (2004) An event data analysis of third-party mediation. J Confl Resolut 48(3):310–330Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Schrodt PA, Gerner DJ, Abu-Jabr R, Yilmaz, Ö, Simpson EM (2001) Analyzing the dynamics of international mediation processes in the Middle East and Balkans. Presented at the American Political Science Association meetings, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Schrodt PA, Palmer G, Hatipoglu ME (2008) Automated detection of reports of militarized interstate disputes using the svm document classification algorithm. Paper presented at American Political Science Association, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Schrodt PA, Van Brackle D (2012) Automated coding of political event data. In: Subrahmanian V (ed) Handbook on computational approaches to counterterrorism. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Shearer R (2006) Forecasting Israeli-Palestinian conflict with hidden Markov models. Available at http://eventdata.psu.edu/papers.dir/Shearer.IP.pdf
  145. 145.
    Shellman S (2000) Process matters: Conflict and cooperation in sequential government-dissident interactions. Journal of Conflict Resolution 15(4), 563–599Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Shellman S (2004) Time series intervals and statistical inference: the effects of temporal aggregation on event data analysis. Secur Stud 12(1):97–104Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Shellman S, Hatfield C, Mills M (2010) Disaggregating actors in intrastate conflict. J Peace Res 47(1):83–90Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Shellman S, Stewart B (2007) Predicting risk factors associated with forced migration: An early warning model of Haitian flight. Civil Wars 9(2):174–199Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Silke A (ed) (2004) Research on terrorism: trends, achievements and failures. Frank Cass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Silke A (2009) Contemporary terrorism studies: issues in research. In: Jackson R, Smyth MB, Gunning J (eds) Critical terrorism studies: a new research agenda. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Silva A, Simari G, Martinez V, Subrahmanian VS (2012) SOMA: Stochastic opponent modeling agents for forecasting violent behavior. In: Subrahmanian V (ed) Handbook on computational approaches to counterterrorism. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Simari GI, Earp D, Martinez MV, Silva A, Subrahmanian VS (2012) Forecasting group-level actions using similarity measures. In: Subrahmanian V (ed) Handbook on computational approaches to counterterrorism. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Simi P (2010) Operation and structure of right-wing extremist groups in the united states, 1980–2007. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACJD/studies/25722/detail
  154. 154.
    Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 1, 634–4Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Sims CA, Waggoner DF, Zha TA (2008) Methods for inference in large multiple-equation Markov-switching models. J Econom 146(2):255–274Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Siroky DS (2009) Navigating random forests and related advances in algorithmic modeling. Stat Surv 3:147–163Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Sliva A, Subrahmanian V, Martinez V, Simari G (2009) Cape: Automatically predicting changes in group behavior. In: Memon N, Farley JD, Hicks DL, Rosenorn T (eds) Mathematical methods in counterterrorism. Springer/Wien, Norderstedt, pp 253–269Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Sun S, Zhang C (2007) The selective random subspace predictor for traffic flow forecasting. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 8(2):367–373Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Svolik MW (2008) Authoritarian reversals and democratic consolidation. Am Pol Sci Rev 102(2):153–168Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Sylvan DA, Chan S (1984) Foreign policy decision making: perception, cognition and artificial intelligence. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Tetlock PE (2005) Expert political judgment: how good is it? How can we know? Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Urdal H (2008) Population, resources and violent conflict: A sub-national study of india 1956–2002. J Confl Resolut 52(4):590–617Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    U.S. National Counterterrorism Center (2009) Worldwide incidents tracking system (wits). http://wits.nctc.gov/
  164. 164.
    Ward MD, Gleditsch KS (2002) Location, location, location: an mcmc approach to modeling the spatial context of war and peace. Pol Anal 10(3):244–260Google Scholar
  165. 165.
    Ward MD, Greenhill BD, Bakke KM (2010) The perils of policy by p-value: predicting civil conflicts. J Peace Res 47(5):363–375Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    Weidman NB, Ward MD (2010) Predicting conflict in space and time. J Confl Resolut 54(6):883–901Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    Weidmann NB, Toft MD (2010) Promises and pitfalls in the spatial prediction of ethnic violence: a comment. Confl Manage Peace Sci 27(2):159–176Google Scholar
  168. 168.
    Xiang J (2010) Relevance as a latent variable in dyadic analysis of conflict. J Pol 72(2): 484–498Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    Young JK, Findley MG (2011) Promise and pitfalls of terrorism research. Int Stud Rev 13:411–431Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    Yonamine JE (2012) Working with even data: a guide to aggregation. Available at http://jayyonamine.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Working-with-Event-Data-A-Guide-to-Aggregation-Choices.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip A. Schrodt
    • 1
  • James Yonamine
    • 1
  • Benjamin E. Bagozzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Political SciencePennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations